We should just lick the brown star of Froomey. I mean how dare we use facts to point out it's rather suspicious!EnacheV said:Imo she is nice to you
You wont have the guts to say same things in a paper, under your signature. You could face jail time and damages over 99.9% of the claims found around here
But that's the beauty of the internet, you can say anything without fearing the consequences
Like " you are a ****er" haha
To even suggest a GT winner usually uses doping is worthy 25 years in the slammer. Pointing out Froome rode for Barloworld with it's own doping issues, add ten years more. Point out leinders? Thrw away the key. Point out the performnce beats known dopers? THE GALLOWS!
I just love it when pointing out cold hard facts (yes the above are undeniable facts) is libel. Even more amusing, it's completely paralel to how the church acted 100's of years ago.
Once again it's faith over fvacts. Nowadays we know how that ends.
Sorry Enchav, we do not belive in fairytales. I suggest you try it on a more gullible public (those also tend to be more easily scared)