Ferminal said:Kerrison hits the nail on the head at the end there, never release data unless you're confident that it is strong supporting evidence of cleanliness.
Well, at least their lack of transparency is becoming much more transparent.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Ferminal said:Kerrison hits the nail on the head at the end there, never release data unless you're confident that it is strong supporting evidence of cleanliness.
Ferminal said:Kerrison hits the nail on the head at the end there, never release data unless you're confident that it is strong supporting evidence of cleanliness.
sniper said:very possible.
Riis arrived a bit late, but perhaps with some envelopes for the right people.
Merckx and Hinault had no problem buddying up with Pharmstrong.No_Balls said:I am pleased to see that. But i wasn´t just referring to the riders in the Peloton but also the old guns. Have Merckx said anything about Froome? Hinault? Dare i even say Armstrong?
Surely they´ve must have recognise that we (if clean) are dealing with the most complete athlete of all time. Able to give doped times a run for their money while being able to TT like no "pure climber" ever before.
And yet everything is so silent.
Mr.38% said:They not only have SRMs, they also have riders and DSes who know how to race (and not just paraphrase trivia and obscure mantras).
Ferminal said:Kerrison hits the nail on the head at the end there, never release data unless you're confident that it is strong supporting evidence of cleanliness.
well Wiggins and JV got into trouble with his Giro numbers...131313 said:Funny, there was another person who was a firm believer in not releasing power data, worrying it would be "misinterpreted": Lance Armstrong
depends on how bad G's hip is. And how long they can hold off using Porte. And HOW they use him. Why Sky need to control the peloton is another matter. who can take time on him in the final chrono? Mollema? no way.Fearless Greg Lemond said:Lets stay focussed, the topic is Christoffer the Great, not bashing Andy Coggan, je vous merci.
Froome must be akin for the Ventoux stage. He will not have help of his teammates though. Saxo have upped the game.
jamesmasters said:Froome getting dropped today was bullsh*t in my opinion. Someone who can go up mountains like he's on a motorbike suddenly gets dropped by Cavendish on a flat stage. Yeah, right. He's just trying to make his win look less ridiculous, avoiding beating the field by over 10 minutes.
blackcat said:depends on how bad G's hip is. And how long they can hold off using Porte. And HOW they use him. Why Sky need to control the peloton is another matter. who can take time on him in the final chrono? Mollema? no way.
131313 said:Umm...Kittels performance was "diverse"! Foome just missed the split when he was just slightly out of position. It happens. 3 seconds becomes one minute pretty quickly in those sorts of winds. Not everything is about doping, and the dope didn't suddenly stop working or anything. That's just bike racing.
murali said:The only second I could see was the 1' + behind wiggins with gerrant thomas coming behind him in National championship.
I don't understand the wattage calculations, but I can differentiate what is plausible improvement and astonishing improvement. WIth Froome, the improvement levels are off the chart. I can allow for a hard-working and fast learning student, as you seem to indicate, but the level of improvement looks suspicious.
(please don't compare with wiggins. That guy doesn't talk straight.)
The Bilharzia story simply feels unbelievable because of this only.
My apprehension is that sky is using this story to cover up for any red-blood cell count variations in the off season.
Franklin said:-2ND TT in the vuelta 2011 (Behind T Martin)
-2ND TT TDF 2012
-3rd TT OS 2012
Considering those results it's not exactly earthshattering he finished second in the first TT in the TdF. The problem is that even though he's an extremely good TT specialist... he's by far the best climber. That's really worrying.
I'm not disagreeing, chances Froome (or Wiggo for that matter) is doping are overwhelmingly against them.
I don't think he didn't have Bilharzia, quite simply because it will show up somewhere along the line. Just like LA really had cancer.
About the synptoms... it's really the clinic going wild here. There are villages swept with the disease. It's a bad disease, but symptoms can differ in person to person.
Keep in mind his Bilharzia is commonly detected by blood tests. This indicates that it can be (and is) detected before the horrible symptoms kick in. And this is exactly how alledgedly Froome's Bilharzia in 2011 was detected.
My take is the guy got Bilharzia, but that it's not as important as people on both sides of the divide make it out to be. He certainly didn't have it when he was becoming a pro (no way you can become a pro with Bilharzia active). On the other hand it's also not the horrific insta-gib disease people here think it is.
And yeah, I'm banking heavily on the "he's a doper" side. But I prefer to stick with things which are verifiable... that's really damning enough. Wild theories are interesting, but to build a case around it is opening yourself up for "crackpot" angles.
Alphabet said:All of that sounds so bad, crippling, lethal. I would expect somebody with advanced bilharzia to be permanently bedridden, and I would be shocked if they could even ride a bike, let alone dominate the pro peloton.
Fearless Greg Lemond said:What you are actually saying is because science just doesnt know what is humanly possible you just dont know if somenone is doping, and thus everyone is innocent untill proven guilty?
It's been posted here one or two days ago as a copy over from the wattage group. Superior Training methods, marginal gains, yadda yadda. Same sh|t different a$$hole.Ripper said:Where did you find that quote?
Seems like Hunter is doing some serious trolling.
Does he actually think no one else uses a power meter properly?
usually the hog passes on the message from the radiostimbo25 said:is it normal for riders to be on the phone often during the race or they just edit it in when froome is calling?
yeah, i'm right with you. if ever there was a race you could win with only 7 including a hairline fracture of the hip, this is it.DirtyWorks said:If we're talking like someone else has a chance as the GC winner, Froome would have to lose the lead by quite a bit (3 minutes maybe?) before the TT. When Froome goes alien during the TT for the 10th time this race, he won't/can't make enough time back.
That's all pie in the sky talk. He's invincible. Like he was since the time Johann Brailsford discovered him doing 10-20th at a TT.
Oh, and Ripper's post above is right.
Franklin said:-2ND TT in the vuelta 2011 (Behind T Martin)
-2ND TT TDF 2012
-3rd TT OS 2012
Considering those results it's not exactly earthshattering he finished second in the first TT in the TdF. The problem is that even though he's an extremely good TT specialist... he's by far the best climber. That's really worrying.
Franklin said:My take is the guy got Bilharzia, but that it's not as important as people on both sides of the divide make it out to be. He certainly didn't have it when he was becoming a pro (no way you can become a pro with Bilharzia active). On the other hand it's also not the horrific insta-gib disease people here think it is.
Ripper said:This pretty much sums it up. At that point one has to calculate - kill myself now or gamble a bit and then kill myself for the MTF ...
as long as you have not banned benotti and chewie and brodeal i got your back.red_flanders said:I have banned two members for continued personal attacks in this thread. I'd prefer people just stopped doing it, I really don't like banning people. Thanks.
Ripper said:Merckx and Hinault had no problem buddying up with Pharmstrong.
They only move away when someone's guilty ... throw 'em under the bus mentality.
well, he is not called the angriest man in the peloton for nuffin.Ripper said:Where did you find that quote?
Seems like Hunter is doing some serious trolling.
Does he actually think no one else uses a power meter properly?