Teams & Riders Froome Talk Only

Page 334 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
mewmewmew13 said:
gheezus I will bet that Michelle wasn't too happy when she read this quote :eek:

The analogy is stupider on the Dawg.

When people are presented with an opportunity to cheat and be successful they do one or two things.

1. They chest and become prosperous or 2. Just keep doing what they're doing and not cheat.

They don't make some earth shattering, life changing moment to give it up and "clean factory floors". It's not as dramatic as that.

And that's why the decision to chest is so easy. You just do it.
 
Dec 13, 2012
1,859
0
0
thehog said:
The analogy is stupider on the Dawg.

When people are presented with an opportunity to cheat and be successful they do one or two things.

1. They chest and become prosperous or 2. Just keep doing what they're doing and not cheat.

They don't make some earth shattering, life changing moment to give it up and "clean factory floors". It's not as dramatic as that.

And that's why the decision to chest is so easy. You just do it.

Ferminal said:
Good on him for not perpetuating the "superior coaching" BS.

Tactics are easy when you are so much stronger than everyone else.
 
Jul 3, 2009
18,948
5
22,485
Yeh, well I'm not sure anyone falls for that one it's more of a joke, but the Sky superiority myth is believable.
 
bot 4u

the sceptic said:
I like that this thread has now become vortex proof and skybot free.

even skybots have a limited attention span............meanwhile the clinic goes

on..........and on

but froomey is wrong to suggest that observers no longer should be

discussing doping............ok there may have been improvements but

it's no time for complacency

Mark L
 
Dec 23, 2011
691
0
9,580
the sceptic said:
I like that this thread has now become vortex proof and skybot free. Speaks volumes about the ridiculousness of Froome.

Nothing of the sort. It's just so much fun watching the clinic's buzzards picking over every offhand comment and microcosm of a news story, squawking "cheat" every couple of seconds. Better than Christmas TV, anyway.
 
Oct 21, 2012
1,106
0
0
BroDeal said:
LOL. Let me get this straight. A man who had no problems hacking into someone else's email account so he could commit identity theft would never ever think of doping. Sounds legit.

Forgive my ignorance, but what's this about? Wouldn't identity theft lead to criminal charges?
 
Apr 3, 2009
12,670
8,590
28,180
doolols said:
Nothing of the sort. It's just so much fun watching the clinic's buzzards picking over every offhand comment and microcosm of a news story, squawking "cheat" every couple of seconds. Better than Christmas TV, anyway.

There's truth in that. However, what you're describing is a reaction. A reaction to the Sky PR machine blathering how every offhand comment somehow is evidence of Froome being clean. BS always gets a reaction.
 
Jan 20, 2013
238
0
0
doolols said:
Nothing of the sort. It's just so much fun watching the clinic's buzzards picking over every offhand comment and microcosm of a news story, squawking "cheat" every couple of seconds. Better than Christmas TV, anyway.

The Clinic. This is the Clinic.

When what is either an obvious cheater or a miracle athlete delivers an interview with ridiculous statements, you expect silence from cycling fans? Are you nuts?

So much for the absence of skybots.:rolleyes:
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
doolols said:
Nothing of the sort. It's just so much fun watching the clinic's buzzards picking over every offhand comment and microcosm of a news story, squawking "cheat" every couple of seconds. Better than Christmas TV, anyway.

Why do so many Sky fans, resort to ad hominem attacks on the clinic that simply take the form of "oh its so fun to watch you (insert insulting noun) (insert insulting verb) over Sky"

There is a discussion taking place. You want to take part. You have a defense of what Froome is saying? because from where I am standing his comments are absolutely ridiculous and viewed as such not just by people in the clinic. I'm open to having my mind changed on that but so far most Sky comments, like the ones which defended Lance for so many years, seem to taunt the alleged stupidity of the detractors, without really offering an explanation for it, and certainly without taking part in the discussion.
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
Alphabet said:
Forgive my ignorance, but what's this about? Wouldn't identity theft lead to criminal charges?

thehog said:
Yes because the Kenyan police have nothing better to do than track down cyclists breaking into kenyancyclingbob734@hotmail.com.

Not much else going on in Kenya for them to do.. :rolleyes:

He was asking a question hog. What is it about. Your sarcastic put down doesn't really offer an answer.

You will know better than me the details here, wasn't it that Froome wanted to ride for GB so he hacked into the Kenyan cycling fed email or some such and sent emails to some other governing body reccomending himself for a change of license?
 
Dec 30, 2011
3,547
0
0
BroDeal said:
LOL. Let me get this straight. A man who had no problems hacking into someone else's email account so he could commit identity theft would never ever think of doping. Sounds legit.

Sorry, this is blatant trolling. Passing off suspicions as fact.
 

martinvickers

BANNED
Oct 15, 2012
4,903
0
0
The Hitch said:
He was asking a question hog. What is it about. Your sarcastic put down doesn't really offer an answer.

You will know better than me the details here, wasn't it that Froome wanted to ride for GB so he hacked into the Kenyan cycling fed email or some such and sent emails to some other governing body reccomending himself for a change of license?

""The Kenyans didn't have a team going into the under-23 world championships but I had access to the Kenyan cycling association's email account. I remembered how to get into the chairman's Hotmail and so I emailed the UCI, saying, 'We're going to send a cyclist to the U23 worlds.'""

Froome's ruse worked and when he arrived in Europe "I had to take four buses and walk a couple of ks, carrying two bikes and a suitcase, to a little B&B outside Salzburg – in the rain. I then had to rush to the managers' meeting that afternoon. I had a map and I set off in the rain. The map disintegrated within minutes so I got lost in downtown Salzburg. I came in 20 minutes late to the auditorium where a guy was talking about the support cars. I walked in right at the front and was told, 'No, no, this is a meeting for managers only.' I said, 'I'm the manager.' The guy gave me a strange look."

The next day Froome "got to the startline for the time trial and 150m into the race I rode straight into a commissaire holding a bunch of papers which went flying up in the air. Both of us hit the ground. It was quite a start to European racing."

http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2013/jan/25/chris-froome-sky-tour-de-france
 
Mar 18, 2009
14,644
81
22,580
From an early age, even before he turned pro, Froome was willing to do anything to make it as a cyclist. He did not care about breaking rules or the law. The notion that years later, after failing in Europe and with no team willing to give him a contract, he would not dope get some results that would allow him to continue is laughable. It is even more laughable when his lack of ethics is combined with Brailsford's opinion of Froome as someone who is completely motivated by money and could be paid off to excuse Wiggins' lack of support.
 
Aug 30, 2010
3,841
533
15,080
The only thing missing from Froomes story is that he walked uphill, all the way. through bad neighborhoods, where his cycling shoes were stolen, his tires slashed, in the rain. The pouring rain. Pouring hard. Harder than ever.
 
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
veganrob said:
The only thing missing from Froomes story is that he walked uphill, all the way. through bad neighborhoods, where his cycling shoes were stolen, his tires slashed, in the rain. The pouring rain. Pouring hard. Harder than ever.
Now you're just making things up. Please, let's keep the facts straight.
Aged 16, on a Christmas Day trip to the coast with his family, he went for a long run along the beach to burn off the anticipated big lunch.

"As I ran I sort of stumbled, and suddenly I'm stuck in the beach. It was a harpoon, half buried in the sand, and I'd trodden right on it. I sat there and tried to get the harpoon out, but it was wedged so deep. There was a barb on it too, so I couldn't just pull it out."

With the help of a passer-by he managed to snap the harpoon's shaft. With no hospital for miles he struggled to a tiny local clinic, housed in a tin hut harpoon still sticking out of his foot.

"The old chap there looked at it and told me there was no way we could pull it out, because it would do too much damage. We'd have to cut it out, from the middle of my foot up to my toes. He just took a razor blade and cut open my foot. I sat there watching him do it."

He grins faintly. "Not a nice way to spend Christmas. But we still had a good lunch. And it does make temporary pain when climbing a mountain stage like Ventoux seem pretty insignificant."
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/cycling/24951818
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
veganrob said:
The only thing missing from Froomes story is that he walked uphill, all the way. through bad neighborhoods, where his cycling shoes were stolen, his tires slashed, in the rain. The pouring rain. Pouring hard. Harder than ever.

Might be true that he had his cyckijg shoes stolen.

The Dawg apparently rode the Commenweath Games ITT in sand shoes!

David Walsh said so. Must be true.
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
Considering froome regularly mixes up several basic details of his bilharzia story, which change from interview to interview, I'm not sure we can really trust such amazingly detailed descriptions of minor events from way way longer ago.
 
Jan 27, 2012
15,232
2,624
28,180
The Hitch said:
Considering froome regularly mixes up several basic details of his bilharzia story, which change from interview to interview, I'm not sure we can really trust such amazingly detailed descriptions of minor events from way way longer ago.

I see a major doc coming up soon.
Poor boy from Kenya, struggling in Europe, succeeding big time and now giving hope to all Africans.

Sky, BBC or Fox Comm?