The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
maxmartin said:"Doctors discovered the rather obscure virus and quickly prescribed treatments that kill just about everything in the body, similar to chemotherapy."
Sounds so like Lance's story, guess you just have to kill yourself first hen get a brand new reborn.
http://velonews.competitor.com/2012...e-battles-parasite-media-cars-expelled_230162
maxmartin said:could this be SKY's new trick, we all know some chemo drugs can makes you completely wasted losing dramatic weight in a matter of weeks, and no anti doping agency bother to test those drugs.
jilbiker said:I wonder why people are saying that Froome will do well in Vuelta 2012?? Its puzzling that if he does remotely well this will not raise a huge red flag?? Tell me how after 3 weeks of the TDF you are recovered and fully ready to go in 3/4 weeks?? Its a no brainer, he CANNOT do well in the Vuelta unless he is on juice. The TDF is no small race and you recover enough in 3-4 weeks to tackle 8 mountain top finishes? Please!! Yes it is possible, through PED of course but not through ANY natural means. On top of that all the best Sky domestiques are at the TDF, tell me that they would be recovered also in 3-4 weeks? Even US Postal did not boast of such a feat.
Moose McKnuckles said:Chris Froome's success is due to the fact that he is an incredible cyclist and racer.
roundabout said:Another thought occured to me, why of all people on the team did Froome improve so much?
Why not Löfkvist or Uran? Two riders who most people would say were more talented (unless one accepts a hick hypothesis, another of the conditions that while plausible each by itself, don't really paint a pretty picture when added together).
Why do only a few people noticeably benefit from the "better training"?
ianfra said:Another question: What do the posters here really know about Froome? Why do they continue to make insulting and unfounded allegations about a person of whom they know nothing.
4 years ago Froome road the British Championship on a tough and hilly course. At the time he was riding for Barloworld. At one point, myself and a bunch of experienced cyclists watched him bridge a gap on a difficult part of the circuit with the most amazing power and panache that we had witnessed for years. Adrian commented: "You know Ian, this guy will win the Tour one day!".
You see those of us who know cycling and understand the sport and have raced ourselves do not make stupid and unfounded allegations. But we can make perceptive comments about a great rider and his potential.
Four Winds said:Yeah, any chemo that will do that to you is likely to make you quite sick, loose hair, possibly cause infertility and lead to potentially fatal infections! Quite a price to pay for a bit of weight loss????
jilbiker said:I wonder why people are saying that Froome will do well in Vuelta 2012?? Its puzzling that if he does remotely well this will not raise a huge red flag?? Tell me how after 3 weeks of the TDF you are recovered and fully ready to go in 3/4 weeks?? Its a no brainer, he CANNOT do well in the Vuelta unless he is on juice. The TDF is no small race and you recover enough in 3-4 weeks to tackle 8 mountain top finishes? Please!! Yes it is possible, through PED of course but not through ANY natural means. On top of that all the best Sky domestiques are at the TDF, tell me that they would be recovered also in 3-4 weeks? Even US Postal did not boast of such a feat.
thehog said:I'm with you. Those Alpine climbs in Britan are a good test for the ones in France.
Good spot.
I always knew he'd be a champion. When I watched him zig zag up San Luca in the 2009 Giro trying to hold Simon Gerrans wheel I knew he'd win the Tour one day.
Doesn't matter he could barely hold his bike upright it was the panache in which he did it with that made be believe one day this guy will not only become the best climber in the Tour but also the greatest time trialist.
Easy to spot a up and coming Tour champion.
spalco said:The Tour-Vuelta double has been done before. And although Froome is no Anquetil or Hinault, undoubtedly those two were not on EPO.
thehog said:I'm with you. Those Alpine climbs in Britan are a good test for the ones in France.
Doctors initially thought the symptoms pointed toward mononucleosis, but treatments failed to resolve his ongoing problems that left him tired and powerless on the bike. It went largely undiagnosed until he underwent extensive blood screening with a switch to Sky in 2010.
ianfra said:Another question: What do the posters here really know about Froome? Why do they continue to make insulting and unfounded allegations about a person of whom they know nothing.
4 years ago Froome road the British Championship on a tough and hilly course. At the time he was riding for Barloworld. At one point, myself and a bunch of experienced cyclists watched him bridge a gap on a difficult part of the circuit with the most amazing power and panache that we had witnessed for years. Adrian commented: "You know Ian, this guy will win the Tour one day!".
You see those of us who know cycling and understand the sport and have raced ourselves do not make stupid and unfounded allegations. But we can make perceptive comments about a great rider and his potential.
roundabout said:Was he clean then?
Von Mises said:Vuelta was in April during Hinault and Anquetil era?
spalco said:Ah, ok. But still, does it really matter which one comes before the other?