Youll be telling us that bears *** in the wood nextParrot23 said:YOU should NOT be a moderator, period.
Youll be telling us that bears *** in the wood nextParrot23 said:YOU should NOT be a moderator, period.
How he looks is completely irrelevant to the discussion here. I'm tired of people just coming here to insult or mock riders, demonstrates they're less interested in whether rider is doping or not but just in expressing their own personal bias against certain riders and calling them names.Netserk said:How is your post any bit less childish?
And Froome is the ugliest thing I have ever seen on a bike.
I should be but i am over qualifiedParrot23 said:YOU should NOT be a moderator, period.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.FrankChickens said:I know what a person with bilharzia looks like, and I also know first hand how Chris rides when he's supposed to be suffering from it.
Now this is how to attack in style.......... and look who he is leaving behind on the melting tarmac.horsinabout said:Froome may have wiped the floor with those two guy's, but he is the ugliest S.O.B I have ever seen pushing pedal. And he looks like his saddle is too low?
Just think you might have to put up with Froome winning the Tour for the next seven years .....enjoy. Natural talent my a*se!
But this on the other hand is very mature?JimmyFingers said:How he looks is completely irrelevant to the discussion here. I'm tired of people just coming here to insult or mock riders, demonstrates they're less interested in whether rider is doping or not but just in expressing their own personal bias against certain riders and calling them names.
Would have hoped you would have recognised that. Shame
JimmyFingers said:I hope he does win all those tours and you have to stare at him the entire time.
two types of attacks^Dekker_Tifosi said:Froome going full genius, something like this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGs-vYYmVE8
He looks so awkward on the bike that it is pretty surprising how he can ride so fast.JimmyFingers said:How he looks is completely irrelevant to the discussion here. I'm tired of people just coming here to insult or mock riders, demonstrates they're less interested in whether rider is doping or not but just in expressing their own personal bias against certain riders and calling them names.
Yeah why not, it was a response to his childish post. It gets to point when you hear the constant sneering and mocking of Sky riders you start to enjoy them winning and saying things like Froome has recently because it winds up posters like horsin even more. If they dealt with their bias maturely I'd engage them in a different way.Netserk said:But this on the other hand is very mature?
Who are you to decide for which reasons one have for disliking certain riders?airstream said:can dislike be explain with pure 'how he looks on bike'. No.
The clip of Wiggins crossing the line at 24'26" in that clip just emphasises he and Froome truly are from different planets on any plane you wish to imagine.airstream said:
I also like the fact you have a Twin Peaks quote in your sigNetserk said:I respect you too Jimmy. The most sensible Skybot?(j/k)
Well I do find Jimmy to be the most sensible of those who support Sky, and the 'skybot' was obviously meant as a joke. If Jimmy took any offence to this, I will delete it without hesitation ofc.airstream said:Hell, is it administrator way of communication??? No comment...
Witch?........you mean which? Your Danish, my spelling would be worse in Danish lolNetserk said:Who are you to decide for witch reasons one have for disliking certain riders?
Winning a 200km TTT in South Africa, end of 2010 after his trip to Kenya where he's supposed to have picked it up. His team were grey-faced and cited Froome's efforts at the front as the reason. I've raced with a few of the guys on the team. Anyways, he was far from ill at that race.Ripper said:Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
So you've seen him training while he's supposedly been suffering?
Do tell more ...
It did look wrong when I spelled it, but I didn't bother looking up the right spellinghorsinabout said:Witch?........you mean which? Your Danish, my spelling would be worse in Danish lol. You see English language has same sounding words spelt different for different meanings - and it's a right pain.
This is IMO the million $ question. It just doesn't seem legit.FrankChickens said:Why did the Bilharzia story only emerge in 2011 post-Vuelta? Like some kind of backdated TUE? It's a serious disease and if he'd had it, we'd have heard about it before then.
Nope you're wrong, the million $ question is "Will a journalist ever ask it?"Netserk said:This is IMO the million $ question. It just doesn't seem legit.