SeriousSam said:All we know is that he is hardly out of breath equaling the second best climber. So absurd.
Just a joke of a race. He could be ten minutes clear if he wanted to be.SeriousSam said:And it remains impossible to say what Froome's power advantage even is
All we know is that he is hardly out of breath equaling the second best climber. So absurd.
deeno1975 said:Joke
Benotti69 said:Mr.38% said:Germany's TOUR mag, popular for not so bad bike and aero tests, compared positions as well some issues ago. Sitting on the top tube was fastest. I'm trying to dig that one out at some point.
Froomes position on that descent is not that aero.
https://twitter.com/Digger_forum/status/755672870009921536
Eindhoven University of Technology study.
BigMac said:In a world where all his adversaries are doped nearly or as much as him, I concede he's the best in the biz and deserves to be in yellow.
More than Froome, I think what sparks most discussion every year is the fact that they always manage to have at least one dom stronger than all other team leaders. From Richie to G to Poels.
Agree, he could just be a super responder. If he was clean pre 2011 (which I'm sceptical about, but even if he was relatively clean), his results during that period were superb for a clean-ish rider, indicating a huge natural talent. Going on a full programme of extreme weight-loss plus blood doping, could turn him into this kind of freak if he is a super resonder.Saint Unix said:The guy is obviously doping, but even for a doper these performances are a bit too much.
If he's doing this without his friends at UCI helping him hide suspicious values or positive tests and without a motor we're probably talking about a once-in-a-lifetime type responder. The guy clearly has another three gears left if he really needs it. A more likely explanation is that Sky have bought a carte blanche from UCI to use every single dirty trick in the book, Armstrong style.
I'd wear a hazmat suit if I had to share a hotel with him.
DFA123 said:Agree, he could just be a super responder. If he was clean pre 2011 (which I'm sceptical about, but even if he was relatively clean), his results during that period were superb for a clean-ish rider, indicating a huge natural talent. Going on a full programme of extreme weight-loss plus blood doping, could turn him into this kind of freak if he is a super resonder.Saint Unix said:The guy is obviously doping, but even for a doper these performances are a bit too much.
If he's doing this without his friends at UCI helping him hide suspicious values or positive tests and without a motor we're probably talking about a once-in-a-lifetime type responder. The guy clearly has another three gears left if he really needs it. A more likely explanation is that Sky have bought a carte blanche from UCI to use every single dirty trick in the book, Armstrong style.
I'd wear a hazmat suit if I had to share a hotel with him.
Catwhoorg said:What a stage this could have been if the Ventoux results hadn't been neutralized and Froome had to make time back.
Catwhoorg said:What a stage this could have been if the Ventoux results hadn't been neutralized and Froome had to make time back.
lol, funny stuff.PremierAndrew said:...
He probably was clean pre-2011
sniper said:lol, funny stuff.PremierAndrew said:...
He probably was clean pre-2011
No, he probably wasn't clean pre-2011.
Such a statement only suggests you know fairly little about Froome's pre-2011 trajectory and the guys he trained with and was coached by.
And were Lance or Floyd or Riis clean pre-transformation? Of course not.
Its all relative though - he was relatively a lot cleaner than he is now. Certainly wasn't doing all this extreme weight loss voodoo back then - the podgy f.....sniper said:lol, funny stuff.PremierAndrew said:...
He probably was clean pre-2011
No, he probably wasn't clean pre-2011.
Such a statement only suggests you know fairly little about Froome's pre-2011 trajectory and the guys he trained with and was coached by.
sniper said:lol, funny stuff.PremierAndrew said:...
He probably was clean pre-2011
No, he probably wasn't clean pre-2011.
Suffice to know a little about Froome's pre-2011 trajectory and the guys he trained with and was coached by.
And were Lance or Floyd or Riis clean pre-transformation? Of course not.
rumors within the SA cycling scene say that he found AICAR in 2011.PremierAndrew said:...
Even if he started doping in 2011, the transformation is unbelievable. It just seems unlikely that he was already doping and still had such an incredibly massive transformation.
Then again, if it was any other rider who hadn't undergone a massive transformation and I saw them once in a Barloworld kit, I'd conclude that they were doping
PremierAndrew said:DFA123 said:Agree, he could just be a super responder. If he was clean pre 2011 (which I'm sceptical about, but even if he was relatively clean), his results during that period were superb for a clean-ish rider, indicating a huge natural talent. Going on a full programme of extreme weight-loss plus blood doping, could turn him into this kind of freak if he is a super resonder.Saint Unix said:The guy is obviously doping, but even for a doper these performances are a bit too much.
If he's doing this without his friends at UCI helping him hide suspicious values or positive tests and without a motor we're probably talking about a once-in-a-lifetime type responder. The guy clearly has another three gears left if he really needs it. A more likely explanation is that Sky have bought a carte blanche from UCI to use every single dirty trick in the book, Armstrong style.
I'd wear a hazmat suit if I had to share a hotel with him.
He probably was clean pre-2011, despite his dodgy links. His transformation is remarkable even if he simply started doping. There's a lot more to Froome's transformation than just clinic stuff
sniper said:rumors within the SA cycling scene say that he found AICAR in 2011.PremierAndrew said:...
Even if he started doping in 2011, the transformation is unbelievable. It just seems unlikely that he was already doping and still had such an incredibly massive transformation.
Then again, if it was any other rider who hadn't undergone a massive transformation and I saw them once in a Barloworld kit, I'd conclude that they were doping
sounds plausible, and it would mean there's even some truth in Swart's otherwise ludicrous claim that 'he just lost the fat'.
Froome, doped to the gills pre-Vuelta and doped to the gills post-Vuelta, only now with AICAR.
