Re: Re:
I knew he didn't have much of a pedigree but didn't realise it was that bad!
Dear Wiggo said:Taxus4a said:Dear Wiggo said:in 2007 Froome was almost starting in cycling
I strenuously disagree.
These are his results in amateur races that date back to 2001.
Perhaps you could reconsider your claim that he was only just starting cycling in 2007?
Just starting cycling compared most of european cyclist. That are not important races, some of them are like here cyclotourist... but as everything I promise inform better about., before to have a better opinion of that, I am happy you answer with argument.
He'd been racing for 6 years.
Theze was prepared to lie about Froome being noticeable with crap results like the ones in that list, and that's why he was accepted to WCC.
Theze then says he had physiology like Hinault.
But his results are nothing like Hinault.
You can keep making up pathetic excuses for his inability to ride, but bottom line, he dopes now, and that's the problem.
If the races are not important, then wonderboy should be smashing everyone there. Instead, he's crap. Utter crap. Brown, runny, smelly crap.
I knew he didn't have much of a pedigree but didn't realise it was that bad!