He won the UAE Tour last year.In contrast, Evenepoel has yet to win a one-week World Tour race, having made eight attempts over the last three years.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
He won the UAE Tour last year.In contrast, Evenepoel has yet to win a one-week World Tour race, having made eight attempts over the last three years.
Yes, that true. But it isn't one of the big one week races.He won the UAE Tour last year.
Hindley and Carapaz also failed in their first GT this year, despite not riding the Giro beforehand. So the trend you see is partly down to a general variability in hitting your targets in good form and avoiding bad luck. After succeeding in the Giro, it's more salient when they fail in the Vuelta, even if the underlying chance was the same for both GTs. I think that statistical effect matters as much as the causal impact the Giro prep has on the Vuelta prep.If he had not gone to the Giro, and focussed on the Vuelta from the beginning, go for GC, not for breaks, then i would not put any money on Skjelmose finishing ahead. I believe riding the Giro beforehand is a bigger factor than you make it out to be or believe to be. Look at riders like Almeida, Hindley, Carapaz... in recent years, who went for GC in the Giro, and then also went for the Vuelta.
winning four
securing six victories
Five, true! I meant within that six year period in which he has won five different one-week World Tour races - but actually seven, not six, total. Apparently I'm bad at counting, haha.Five.
Six big stage races and some more then once.
Yeah, that's true. I should have made it clear that I meant the big ones that actually matter.He won the UAE Tour last year.
Five, true! I meant within that six year period in which he has won five different one-week World Tour races - but actually seven, not six, total. Apparently I'm bad at counting, haha.
Sure, if you say so..Almeida would have beat Mas and was ahead of him, Adam was disappointing.
Almeida is a better GC rider and was performing better than Mas till he got sick on climbs that didn’t suit him.Sure, if you say so..
No. Rogla, Eetvelt and Mas were the strongest riders on the stage 4 uphill finish.Almeida is a better GC rider and was performing better than Mas till he got sick on climbs that didn’t suit him.
Almeida came back on a climb that didn’t suit him to finish third. When we had some on here before the stage stating it didn’t suit his characteristics and if he got dropped he wasn’t coming back, when he started yo-yoing that he will lose some time, and then had enough strength to finish third still. Only way Mas was beating Almeida was if Almeida got sick, and he did.No. Rogla, Eetvelt and Mas were the strongest riders on the stage 4 uphill finish.
I really like this ranking, except that I would rank Ayuso behind Mas and put Carapaz in 7th place.My ranking would look something like this:
1.Pogacar
2. Vingegaard
While it is a very close contest between the two, I would still rank Vingegaard slightly higher in Grand Tours. However, Pogacar demonstrates exceptional strength in one-week races and maintains peak form throughout the year.
3. Roglic
4. Evenepoel
Similarly, the competition between these two is tight, but Roglic’s experience and achievements place him in third. Over the past six years, Roglic has participated in 12 Grand Tours, winning four and finishing on the podium in eight. He DNF the remaining four. Additionally, Roglic has competed in 13 one-week World Tour races, securing six victories. In contrast, Evenepoel has yet to win a one-week World Tour race, having made eight attempts over the last three years.
5. Yates
6. Almeida
Yates holds the fifth spot in my ranking. Although Almeida is gaining ground, Yates has won two one-week World Tour races over the past two seasons, while Almeida has yet to secure a victory.
7. Ayuso
8. Mas
Mas is the stronger rider in Grand Tours, but Ayuso excels in one-week races. Over the course of his career, Mas has finished in the top five of a one-week World Tour race only three times out of 23 starts, with his best result being fifth place.
9. Landa
10. O'Connor
11. Rodriguez
Landa ranks ninth due to his consistent performance in both Grand Tours and one-week races. As for the tenth spot, it's difficult to decide. Many riders could be considered, but for me, it's between O'Connor and Rodriguez. O'Connor's superior results in Grand Tours give him the edge, but he is also a strong competitor in one-week races.
Even disregarding O'Connor's Vuelta, he still finished 4th in the Giro, which by all accounts still should be rated higher than Skjelmose's 5th spot in the Vuelta.Hindley and Carapaz also failed in their first GT this year, despite not riding the Giro beforehand. So the trend you see is partly down to a general variability in hitting your targets in good form and avoiding bad luck. After succeeding in the Giro, it's more salient when they fail in the Vuelta, even if the underlying chance was the same for both GTs. I think that statistical effect matters as much as the causal impact the Giro prep has on the Vuelta prep.
Some riders are more fragile than others, or vary in motivation and professionalism. Some riders can only get their act together for a single target in a season (looking at you, Thomas). O'Connor did well in that regard this year, but quite poorly the two previous years. Could be down to luck or greater abilities this year. Only the latter should merit a higher ranking.
If you disregard O’Connors time gain in the Vuelta, then you are comparing 4th in the Giro with 4th in the Vuelta and it’s not self evident which of them rates higher in terms of power ranking. If Giro was ridden in the same way Vuelta was where the race exploded almost every mountain stage, who knows if BOC still gets 4th… Giro was ridden conservatively by anyone but Pog.Even disregarding O'Connor's Vuelta, he still finished 4th in the Giro, which by all accounts still should be rated higher than Skjelmose's 5th spot in the Vuelta.
Bernard was probably the biggest drop off.make it out to be or believe to be. Look at riders like Almeida, Hindley, Carapaz... in recent years, who went for GC in the Giro, and then also went for the Vuelta.
If you wanna play it like that, even without his timegain in the Vuelta, he still finishes in the top 10. And if you want to address the pace in the Vuelta, then surely that tells you something about the effort he had to put in to defend his lead.If you disregard O’Connors time gain in the Vuelta, then you are comparing 4th in the Giro with 4th in the Vuelta and it’s not self evident which of them rates higher in terms of power ranking. If Giro was ridden in the same way Vuelta was where the race exploded almost every mountain stage, who knows if BOC still gets 4th… Giro was ridden conservatively by anyone but Pog.
I don't want to play anything, I'm just pointing out the comparison between Vuelta and the Giro tells you very little about power ranking because Vuelta was ridden way harder than the Giro, which was basically a stalemate for podium spots. I personally rate BOC above Skjelmose in GC power ranking. Yes he gained time because they let him but he also lost more than he would optimally lose had he not gone all-in a couple of times when defending the red jersey...If you wanna play it like that, even without his timegain in the Vuelta, he still finishes in the top 10. And if you want to address the pace in the Vuelta, then surely that tells you something about the effort he had to put in to defend his lead.
I'm not ranking results, so no.Even disregarding O'Connor's Vuelta, he still finished 4th in the Giro, which by all accounts still should be rated higher than Skjelmose's 5th spot in the Vuelta.
Almeida got dropped on the only climb they raced before he got sick, and because the three strongest then stalled and Almeida made it back again, you use that sole result as argument that Almeida was performing better than Mas. I just don't see it. Was Landa also performing better than Mas on that stage (if it could be argued that the climb didn't suit him)?Almeida came back on a climb that didn’t suit him to finish third. When we had some on here before the stage stating it didn’t suit his characteristics and if he got dropped he wasn’t coming back, when he started yo-yoing that he will lose some time, and then had enough strength to finish third still. Only way Mas was beating Almeida was if Almeida got sick, and he did.
Almeida got dropped on the only climb they raced before he got sick, and because the three strongest then stalled and Almeida made it back again, you use that sole result as argument that Almeida was performing better than Mas. I just don't see it. Was Landa also performing better than Mas on that stage (if it could be argued that the climb didn't suit him)?
Yes, with regards to the narrow claim of who performed better on the stage 4 MTF, Van Eetvelt should be ranked above Almeida.Almeida always gets dropped on climbs (at least before TdS of this year) and then makes it back so I think he is a special case in that department.
Should Van Eetvelt not be ranked above him if your logic is applied?
"Climbs that didn't suit him" = Pico Villuercas.Almeida [...] was performing better than Mas till he got sick on climbs that didn’t suit him.