Dekker_Tifosi said:Not exactly impressive.
If Durbridge rode in dry conditions he'd pretty much have destroyed Phinney by a large margin.
Especially in the downhill and the way to the finish he lost pretty much.
Poor Durbridge.
Notice also Kittel and Oliveira were pretty close
Phinney has still a long way to go to become the all dominating destroyer that some predict him to become.
For now, he is just good, nothing more. Not great, not superb. Not today
Bye Bye Bicycle said:Good to see Ben King back on the ground...
I think that is a bit harsh. I do think Durbridge would of beaten Phinney if on same conditions but both their riders were impressive.Dekker_Tifosi said:Not exactly impressive.
If Durbridge rode in dry conditions he'd pretty much have destroyed Phinney by a large margin.
Especially in the downhill and the way to the finish he lost pretty much.
Poor Durbridge.
Notice also Kittel and Oliveira were pretty close
Phinney has still a long way to go to become the all dominating destroyer that some predict him to become.
For now, he is just good, nothing more. Not great, not superb. Not today
auscyclefan94 said:I think that is a bit harsh. I do think Durbridge would of beaten Phinney if on same conditions but both their riders were impressive.
Looking at the first split times, Durbridge and Mammini are 1st and 2nd. Very conveniently, one started just after the other. Mammini faded away a little bit to finish 6th. But why should we automatically assume that maybe these guys didn't profit from good wind conditions themselves?Dekker_Tifosi said:It's the thing I hate about time trials in general
When the strongest rider doesn't win due to the racing conditions. Bleh. (yes, even when the guy who profits is dutch)
Dutch??? - Excuse my ignorance!Dekker_Tifosi said:It's the thing I hate about time trials in general
When the strongest rider doesn't win due to the racing conditions. Bleh. (yes, even when the guy who profits is dutch)
Spare Tyre said:Phinney also seems to think Durbridge might have won if he didn't have wet conditions.
As soon as someone wins something, we're quick to embrace him as one of our ownauscyclefan94 said:Dutch??? - Excuse my ignorance!
theyoungest said:As soon as someone wins something, we're quick to embrace him as one of our ownWelcome to the family, Kleermaker Finnie.
on3m@n@rmy said:Couple of you pre-race posters picked Phinney and Kittel to finish in the top 5 or so. Nice job there, and to Phinney, Durbridge and Kittel. Beforehand, I knew about minni-P, but Durbridge though... he might be a huge talent in his own right.
Dekker_Tifosi said:No, you both don't get it.
I was saying I hate it when the strongest guy doesn't win and someone else profits.
Even if it where a dutch guy who would have won because of it (profited) f.e.x Dumoulin starts in 0 wind and the rest in a hurricane.
I wouldn't be happy with the win.
Am I that hard to understand these days![]()
Dekker_Tifosi said:In a road race I agree, the beauty of the sport is that the strongest of the day doesn't always win. (loses more often actually)
But in a time trial, I heavily disagree. The strongest should win. It should be the fairest discipline. But sometimes the weather interfears and blows the fun![]()
Jamsque said:I'm not really one to quote the Bible, but:
Eccclesiastes 9:11
I returned, and saw under the sun, that the race went not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time and chance happeneth to them all.
Was Durbridge stronger on the day? Maybe. We'll never know. What we DO know is that he didn't win.
auscyclefan94 said:I think that is a bit harsh. I do think Durbridge would of beaten Phinney if on same conditions but both their riders were impressive.
It happens all the time in time trials... just look at the final Tour TT, Menchov could probably have won it, or at least given Cancellara a fair run for the money, but he was 4 minutes back due to the massive headwind he had to plough through. One thing does strike me: winners make their own luck. So maybe Phinney is a winner.Polyarmour said:While riding home in the wet last night I began thinking about this post again. Riding in the wet is so much more difficult it took me another 10 minutes to get home. Yet Durbridge lost by only a fraction of a second over 32km. It seems like an unfair contest. Even the winner graciously conceded that Durbridge probably should have won, yet who is the World Champion?
I wondered whether there are any ways that would enable the TT to be played out on a fairer basis?
I'm not sure why Durbridge and Phinney weren't riding at the same time? That would have helped. But when the times are so close and the conditions so different perhaps they should have ridden again to decide the winner? But in practical terms this might be difficult to administer.
