MarkvW said:
Dave isn't arguing that USPS was worse than Rabo, he's arguing that USPS was unique. That's ridiculous.
I don't think that being a more successful cheat is "worse" than being an unsuccessful cheat. The moral offense is the same.
And as far as "ruining careers" goes, that is bad--but it didn't make him go faster on the bike.
Okay, a couple more examples:
Cancer Jesus, pocketing all those appearance fees and never donating a dime. Unique.
Lobbying to compete in triathlon post lifetime ban. Unique.*
Look, you love Lance. Face it. He was unique. That makes USPS unique.
*Add that a member of the sponsor cadre assembled to 'assist Lance' as he re-embarked in triathlon recently noted in a private conversation, "testing isn't as rigorous in triathlon as it is cycling".
Now, was that a cynical statement, a projection, or a common understanding within the group?
Whichever way you interpret it, it goes back to character. Unique.
A character well understood by all those closest to him. Unique.
And Rabo exposing Rasmussen? If you are right, then that undermines your entire argument that Rabo was anywhere near as bad as USPS.
Postal was a masterpiece of choreographed deception. Apparently, as you suggest, Rabo was not.
Too bad. Maybe Leinders is/was better than we think. If so, Rabo sold him short too.
Dave.