General News Thread

Page 451 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
I repeat what other pro riders (NOT dutch, before that card gets pulled) have said

"There seems to be a great disparity between what the fans see and what pro riders see".

As in, pro riders see what Eeckhoff did as perfectly normal and acceptable after bad luck early in the race. So if it isn't, for them it's a huge change in pro cycling.
While fans think they've seen something outrageous, which isn't the case because it happens all the time, basically everytime even.
 
Stokbro and Konychev got DQed and they didn't win.

Stokbro was even DQed after he'd already abandoned. Essentially, he that issue (can't remember if it was a crash of mechanic…), tried to get back behind his car, was told to stop, stopped, and realised it was hopeless… So for him it's only a matter of having a DSQ next to his name rather than a DNF.

As for Eekhoff; it's kind of complicated, because… well… not really fair to Battistella to just take his championship away now.
Guess all UCI can do now is to admit that the whole thing was stupid, and promise that in the future they'll be much more careful with (after-the-fact) DQing.

Okay, this is completely crazy! But could UCI essentially decide that "You know what? *** this! You're both World Champions now! Battistella de jure, and Eekhoff de facto!"? It could only possibly work because it's a U23 race, and they're both moving up to the WT, so neither will get a chance to wear the jersey anyway…
 
Last edited:
Honestly, when I first saw the first post about this (without reading the article) my initial reaction was "Well, did he say anything about how long after?"
Like, Bernal is retiring after winning the Tour de France - obviously, since he's already won it - so "after" in this case could mean one year (hopefully not) or ten years (or twenty years…)
 
Honestly, when I first saw the first post about this (without reading the article) my initial reaction was "Well, did he say anything about how long after?"
Like, Bernal is retiring after winning the Tour de France - obviously, since he's already won it - so "after" in this case could mean one year (hopefully not) or ten years (or twenty years…)

Too bad so many riders decide to stop before winning the Tour.
 
Looks somewhat underwhelming, certainly if you factor in the stage length. Stages 2 and 4 should be solid, the rest looks like reduced bunch sprints. This must also be the only race not to hand out mountain points for the hardest climb of the race (Passo Castrin). And then there's another stage where the hardest climb of the day (Vinschgauer Höhenstrasse) goes uncategorised, makes RCS look logical.
 
A couple of news for future Giros:

*Yesterday they tested with some male and female riders (including Caruso) the sterrato road that from Piano Provenzana goes to the Osservatorio Etneo for the already rumored full Etna MTT.

*The mayor of Grosio is working to have a passage on Passo di Verva, sadly here they want to go a la ASO and pave everything instead of keeping the sterrato because the idea is to have a touristic high mountain bike lane.
 
Going up to over 2,800m of altitude at the start of May on an unpaved road sounds totally unrealistic.
The highest realistic finish would probably be the ski station above rifugio sapienza at around 2500m and even that would be hard to do at the start of May.
Sicily would have to be willing to pay for the last 3 stages of a Giro and finding other places in southern italy that are willing to pay for 3rd week mountain stages is probably not that easy.
That said, a real Etna tappone with 3 or 4 different sides of the vulcano would be pretty good, put another climb before it and you get +5,000m of altitude gain.