Looking for the latest race results? - We got you covered right here!
That's just cause almost every ranking in cycling is trashIt's actually funny because I have the feeling that Fuglsang has had an absolutely astonishing season while Valverde has had a pretty lacklustre year.
Yet, somehow, Valverde has almost 200 CQ points more and is in third place.
https://www.cyclingranking.com/riders/overallThat's just cause almost every ranking in cycling is trash
Hinault in 10th okaaaaayyy
Hinault in 10th okaaaaayyy
Probably, CQ ranking rates smaller races higher than the equivalent PCS ranking where Fuglsang is higher than Valverde.It's actually funny because I have the feeling that Fuglsang has had an absolutely astonishing season while Valverde has had a pretty lacklustre year.
Yet, somehow, Valverde has almost 200 CQ points more and is in third place.
He won Paris-Roubaix and 2 Vuelta stages.By the way, why is Gilbert nominated for the Velo d'Or????
Well I was just wondering, seeing that he has barely done anything apart from those results you mention. Seem very cheap for a velo d'Or nominee. Mads P as World Champ I can understand even if his season has been a mess otherwise. But in my opinion Bettiol also deserves a nomination when Gilbert gets one, as he had a much better spring with multiple top results including the RVV win. In all fairness it is not too hard to find at least 20 riders who've had better seasons than GilbertHe won Paris-Roubaix and 2 Vuelta stages.
But I agree he shouldn't be on the list. Same as Remco. There were conversations even on this forum who between Remco and Pogačar has had the better first season and many would agree it's been Pogačar. Yet Remco is nominated because of the hype.
And many would say it was Remco. Now what. What kind of an argument is that?He won Paris-Roubaix and 2 Vuelta stages.
But I agree he shouldn't be on the list. Same as Remco. There were conversations even on this forum who between Remco and Pogačar has had the better first season and many would agree it's been Pogačar. Yet Remco is nominated because of the hype.
Assuming they nominate for "outstanding achievements" then you have to factor in age/development as well, imho. Pogacar won 3 mountain stages in the Vuelta + GC podium, a stage + GC in California and Algarve. Evenepoel "won" Hammer Limburg, a stage + GC in BBT, a stage in AIRace, Classica San Sebastian, gold ECC ITT, silver WCC ITT. They basically won more than a lot of sprinters did this year. For me, they both deserve to be on there (and more than some others who are). That doesn't have to mean they are contenders for Alaphilippe or Roglic to win.Neither Pogacar nor Evenepoel should be on there but if they nominate the same amount of riders every year the cutoff has to fall somewhere.
Raymond Poulidor is in hospital and prognosis is not good: http://lequipe.fr/Cyclisme-sur-route/Actualites/Raymond-poulidor-a-le-coeur-use/1067976
You know De Vlaeminck always wants to prove he can do whatever Merckx can do.Okay, someone needs to go out there and collect all the legendary old riders, and keep them safe somewhere!
After Poulidor first Merckx, and most recently De Vlaeminck (article in Dutch) have been admitted to the hospital.
https://www.telegraaf.nl/sport/943696015/dwarslaesie-voor-sunweb-talent-maas-19Edo Maas, a 19 year old Dutchman riding for Sunweb crashed into a car that suddenly entered the parcours in the descent of the Madonna del Ghisallo in Il Piccolo Lombardia.
He's stable and his life isn't in danger, but he suffered multiple fractures to his back, neck and face.