Giro 2013 rumours

Page 20 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Oct 19, 2011
3,000
1,671
16,680
Can't say that I like the rumours so far. Galibier is a great mountain, but I prefer that they stay inside Italy most of the time.

There aren't any stages in the central Dolomites around Fedaia, Giau, etc. I really liked they stages to Tre Cime Lavaredo in 2007 and Gardneccia in 2011 and would have liked to see a similar stage next year. 220-230 km in the Dolomites with mountains the entire day.

On the other hand I don't mind Zoncolan being left out. That climb is almost too steep and tough.
 
Oct 19, 2011
3,000
1,671
16,680
Eshnar said:
Ofc yes. Any descent finish on both sides would be awesome.
If it has to be a MTF, then the perfect option is Bormio 2000.

Okay, agree on Bormio 2000.

I would have liked a Gavia/Stelvio double with a finish at Solda. That could have been interesting.
 
Mar 24, 2011
10,525
1,924
25,680
OlavEH said:
Okay, agree on Bormio 2000.

I would have liked a Gavia/Stelvio double with a finish at Solda. That could have been interesting.
Yes, that'd be good too.
 
Sep 20, 2012
9
0
0
Eshnar said:
For a moment my heart missed a beat.
Then I realised it's last year's route :)

oh... damn.... weird that they pull the Galibier stage out of its position though... was thinking id turned into the kid from Mercury Rising and cracked the code!
 
Aug 29, 2010
3,205
250
13,880
airstream said:
cmon, we understand the idea pretty clearly even without his words. naturally, they could use only legendry climb. going to france for finish on non-legendary one would be a mockery.

A mockery? Your irrational concept that in order for a climb to be important and crucial it has to be the MTF is reaching new heights. Was this stage a mockery?

15.gif


It wasn't. And if that stage was so epic was precisely because the finish was not at the top of the Galibier.
 
Mar 24, 2011
10,525
1,924
25,680
Descender said:
It wasn't. And if that stage was so epic was precisely because the finish was not at the top of the Galibier.
+100000000

I told Acquarone that I don't like that stage. Even Phinney entered the discussion :D He (phinney) doesn't agree with me I'm afraid. He did ask for a TT more though. And Acquarone answered to just wait and see.
 

airstream

BANNED
Mar 29, 2011
5,122
0
0
Descender said:
A mockery? Your irrational concept that in order for a climb to be important and crucial it has to be the MTF is reaching new heights. Was this stage a mockery?

15.gif


It wasn't. And if that stage was so epic was precisely because the finish was not at the top of the Galibier.

i'm saying not about height. but their goal is to finish at the most famous possible french climb. it's not les deux alpes so i understand aquarone. rcs has no goal to poke in the stage as many hard climbs as possible. in my view, when tour stage finishes on prato nevoso, tour can afford this, because the tour is adored, welcomed and famous all over the world. but the giro can't afford to finish on by and large a rank-and-file (in terms of contribution into world cycling) climb as les deux alpes. so giro organizers chose between alpe-d'huez and galibier. probably, they couldn't reach an agreement with alpe for financial reasons, so we have galibier. here it is
 
Aug 29, 2010
3,205
250
13,880
It seems to me you're still not getting the point.

I see no need to finish on top of a climb to honour it. In fact, to me, honouring the Galibier was 1998. That was really honouring that mythical climb.
 

airstream

BANNED
Mar 29, 2011
5,122
0
0
Descender said:
It seems to me you're still not getting the point.

I see no need to finish on top of a climb to honour it. In fact, to me, honouring the Galibier was 1998. That was really honouring that mythical climb.

no i understood what you said and i see, but that's that. marketing is often more important, for organizers surely, not for fans. or you think that inclusion of galibier doesn't honour pantani's raid?
 
Sep 21, 2009
2,978
0
0
Eshnar said:
Oh, I just noticed Galibier is not Cima Coppi.
The Gavia is lower, how many climbs higher than Galibier are left? ;)


Stelvio I'd bet on it.
Before Val Senales *facepalm*

Agnello? :p
 

airstream

BANNED
Mar 29, 2011
5,122
0
0
сmon lets hope rcs hit one more stage with finish on agnel instead of '???' in Eshnar's reports! :) :p really magical climb: long 10% sections at 2000+m altitude and feeling of full estrangement from civilization that doesn't work looking at gavia, galibier or stelvio. italian climb was used more often in the tour than in the giro, its high time to eliminate this embarrassing mistake
 
Feb 20, 2010
33,066
15,280
28,180
Galibier MTF *vomit*

What's the point? Just because they can? Horrible, absolutely horrible.

You know what would have been better? Briançon. You can honour some major Tour climbs, and have that awesome Citadel finish. You know what would have been better? Finishing on the Col de la Madeleine. Now there's an iconic Tour climb that, unlike almost every other iconic Tour climb except Ventoux, isn't overused. That would give you an awesome Tour MTF, plus way lower altitude so less likely to be weather affected.
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
Eshnar said:
No matter how soft this will be, who wants to win the Tour will not be in shape in May. There is no way the Giro will work as a preparation for the Tour. AC 2011 and Froome 2012 already made that clear. You can't win 2 GTs in a row.

it might make Nibali consider doing the Tour after the Giro, but wont make anyone doing the Tour consider the Giro.

even worse, they could alienate purito.
 

airstream

BANNED
Mar 29, 2011
5,122
0
0
Libertine Seguros said:
Galibier MTF *vomit*

What's the point? Just because they can? Horrible, absolutely horrible.

You know what would have been better? Briançon. You can honour some major Tour climbs, and have that awesome Citadel finish. You know what would have been better? Finishing on the Col de la Madeleine. Now there's an iconic Tour climb that, unlike almost every other iconic Tour climb except Ventoux, isn't overused. That would give you an awesome Tour MTF, plus way lower altitude so less likely to be weather affected.

they finished in citadel two times. geography should be widen. madeleine is a great idea. but frenchies would refuse i think because the climb never was finishing in the tour
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
Eshnar said:
+100000000

I told Acquarone that I don't like that stage. Even Phinney entered the discussion :D He (phinney) doesn't agree with me I'm afraid. He did ask for a TT more though. And Acquarone answered to just wait and see.

lol what. you talked to Aquarone and Phinney?

And phinney is doing the Giro next year? Good on him if he is.
 
May 26, 2009
10,230
579
24,080
Daniel Freibe just tweeted that he had it on good authority a few months ago Passo Pura near Zoncolan will be used.
 
Mar 24, 2011
10,525
1,924
25,680
The Hitch said:
lol what. you talked to Aquarone and Phinney?

And phinney is doing the Giro next year? Good on him if he is.
ehm... not talked. tweeted. :eek:
 
Mar 24, 2011
10,525
1,924
25,680
luckyboy said:
Daniel Freibe just tweeted that he had it on good authority a few months ago Passo Pura near Zoncolan will be used.
Vajont stage probably.
 
Mar 24, 2011
10,525
1,924
25,680
The Hitch said:
it might make Nibali consider doing the Tour after the Giro, but wont make anyone doing the Tour consider the Giro.

even worse, they could alienate purito.
If Nibali has any contact with reality, he'll win the Giro and then try the Vuelta. Purito knows he has no chance to win the Tour, so I guess he'll focus on the Vuelta and will probably race the Giro.
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
Eshnar said:
If Nibali has any contact with reality, he'll win the Giro and then try the Vuelta. Purito knows he has no chance to win the Tour, so I guess he'll focus on the Vuelta and will probably race the Giro.

If phinney gets his tt wish he has no chance at the giro either. But my guess is hell choose it over le tour if only because that will allow him better prep for his home race.