I agree, but weren't you saying post-classics that races with one rider holding a lead for hours on end was dull?DFA123 said:VMT. Not sure why you watch cycling if you can't enjoy that stage, regardless of which riders are your favourites. That was incredible entertainment for three hours.Valv.Piti said:Seriously, that was one of the greatest stages of modern cycling?!Red Rick said:Ohwell
That was frustrating
LaFlorecita said:How is it still entertaining when you realize one man is 20 leagues above the rest? Just killed all the excitement.DFA123 said:VMT. Not sure why you watch cycling if you can't enjoy that stage, regardless of which riders are your favourites. That was incredible entertainment for three hours.Valv.Piti said:Seriously, that was one of the greatest stages of modern cycling?!Red Rick said:Ohwell
That was frustrating
Just enjoy it for what it is. Like him or not, Froome has been the main protagonist in by far the two most entertaining stages of this Giro - it's a much more entertaining race for having him here.Baldinger said:I'm really torn about this.
It's a completely different scenario. This would have been a bit dull for a one day race. But Froome wasn't actually in the virtual lead until about 20km to go.Brullnux said:I agree, but weren't you saying post-classics that races with one rider holding a lead for hours on end was dull?DFA123 said:VMT. Not sure why you watch cycling if you can't enjoy that stage, regardless of which riders are your favourites. That was incredible entertainment for three hours.Valv.Piti said:Seriously, that was one of the greatest stages of modern cycling?!Red Rick said:Ohwell
That was frustrating
Brullnux said:Perhaps, but Dumoulin looked spent and did let Reichenbach do a lot of work on the flat. If he hadn't been the time might've just been lost elsewhere.DFA123 said:Yep, letting that gap go out to two minutes on a descent was a terrible error of judgement.webvan said:Gigs_98 said:Dumoulin is around 40 seconds behind Froome. It's over.
Must be kicking himself for not trying to bridge alone in the Finestre descent...
Agreed, he's gone up in my estimation as well. Really gutsy ride. He's clearly a level below the very best stage racers on top form, but he seems more consistent and is a fighter.jaylew said:Mad props to Dumoulin. I thought his Giro win was a bit of a fluke but clearly it wasn't. Terrific performance. I am now a fan.
Dekker_Tifosi said:oh well.. tom did well..unfortunately Froome is about 3 classes better than anyone right now , while a week ago hed drop 40 seconds on a mole hill
Yep, ultimately you could argue the difference between Froome being in pink or not, is because he had the biggest cojones to go all out on the Finestre descent.webvan said:Brullnux said:Perhaps, but Dumoulin looked spent and did let Reichenbach do a lot of work on the flat. If he hadn't been the time might've just been lost elsewhere.DFA123 said:Yep, letting that gap go out to two minutes on a descent was a terrible error of judgement.webvan said:Gigs_98 said:Dumoulin is around 40 seconds behind Froome. It's over.
Must be kicking himself for not trying to bridge alone in the Finestre descent...
But likely not 3'20"...well we'll never know.
Also, there was a non-neglible chance he could crack big time. Rarely happens to a Cancellara or a Boonen.DFA123 said:It's a completely different scenario. This would have been a bit dull for a one day race. But Froome wasn't actually in the virtual lead until about 20km to go.Brullnux said:I agree, but weren't you saying post-classics that races with one rider holding a lead for hours on end was dull?DFA123 said:VMT. Not sure why you watch cycling if you can't enjoy that stage, regardless of which riders are your favourites. That was incredible entertainment for three hours.Valv.Piti said:Seriously, that was one of the greatest stages of modern cycling?!Red Rick said:Ohwell
That was frustrating
You're absolutely right. I just can't figure out how he can go from medicore to superior like that. But then again. He makes a perfect villain and I kind of like him for that.DFA123 said:Just enjoy it for what it is. Like him or not, Froome has been the main protagonist in by far the two most entertaining stages of this Giro - it's a much more entertaining race for having him here.Baldinger said:I'm really torn about this.
Imagine if he wasn't here, Dumoulin would be three minutes ahead and the race would have been over 3km into the Finestre.