well that was a good Giro, cant wait for the Tour
It will be good if you just give up concentrating on who gets first like I've done.
The battle between Esteban Chaves, Jan Hirt and Fortunato for a top 5 is about to begin.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
well that was a good Giro, cant wait for the Tour
Lipowitz did great today. He had 2 choices today, chase after Pogacar to win the stage or wait for Martinez. No wonder why his team called him back LOL.No way. These kind of egotistical posts only prove that he would have never worked for Martinez like Lipowitz did today.
It will be good if you just give up concentrating on who gets first like I've done.
The battle between Esteban Chaves, Jan Hirt and Fortunato for a top 5 is about to begin.
Pink fairytale dust is required for this head in the sand comment, 'pedigree' or not.
unfortunately performances like this make the Giro unwatchable on German TV. For the final couple of km, Bengsch didn't stop shouting that Lipowitz shouldn't work for Martinez, who has no chance anyway.Lipowitz did great today. He had 2 choices today, chase after Pogacar to win the stage or wait for Martinez. No wonder why his team called him back LOL.
If this repeats again, I am afraid they have to let him go. And I don't doubt his team will free him for stage hunting.
OK MIKKEL, I'M NEITHER BLIND NOR DEAF."I DROVE 470 WATTS FOR TEN MINUTES" - MIKKEL BJERG HAPPY WITH HIS OWN PERFORMANCE ON THE 2ND STAGE OF THE GIRO
It was a good day for Mikkel Bjerg and UAE when Tadej Pogačar took his first victory in the Giro. Here the Dane again played a big role, as he took a big lead on the last climb of the stage. After the stage, Mikkel Bjerg was also quite satisfied with his own performance, where he said that he drove 470 watts for about ten minutes.
He's a very boring rider on the bike (off the bike he seems like a nice enough guy), he represents a team and style of racing which was unpopular during its dominance, the international coverage being in English with very biased commentators who fawn all over him irritates some parts of the viewer base, and then there's the many other things about his career path and form cycles which would need to be taken to another part of the forum to discuss.
As someone who got into watching cycling at the start of the Armstrong years, this is quite a natural inclination for me. A GT can be great entertainment even with a dominant rider. It's not all about who wins it.It will be good if you just give up concentrating on who gets first like I've done.
I have found every country media to be nationalistic anyway. LOL. You won't believe what they say about Quintana in the Colombia media. It is embarrassing at times.unfortunately performances like this make the Giro unwatchable on German TV. For the final couple of km, Bengsch didn't stop shouting that Lipowitz shouldn't work for Martinez, who has no chance anyway.
And now he'll talk about it for the remainder of the week. He still claims on a daily base that Kanter would have won in Abbruzzo if Lutsenko had not ruined his chances by going on the attack.
There tend to be two types of bias to that though.I have found every country media to be nationalistic anyway. LOL. You won't believe what they say about Quintana in the Colombia media. It is embarrassing at times.
You could basically argue UAE or Jumbo are often employing exactly the same mountain train as Sky. Teams race like them or even Postal in GTs because it works. Yes, Pogacar can attack earlier or even attack at will because he's by far the strongest individual rider, a train isn't the only way to win a mountain finish, but UAE still essentially created a Sky train today that lasts long-enough and hard enough to begin dropping second level GC riders weakens podium level and then launch Pogacar. This is exactly how Sky and Jumbo do it too when they have the strongest rider in the race.He's a very boring rider on the bike (off the bike he seems like a nice enough guy), he represents a team and style of racing which was unpopular during its dominance, the international coverage being in English with very biased commentators who fawn all over him irritates some parts of the viewer base, and then there's the many other things about his career path and form cycles which would need to be taken to another part of the forum to discuss.
Karsten Migels commentary wasn't that nationalistic back in the zeros and 10s. Especially when he was constantly paired with Leclercq they used to commentate for the true cycling passionists mainly. Sadly, that changed after 2019. Nowadays it becomes unbearable sometimes.unfortunately performances like this make the Giro unwatchable on German TV. For the final couple of km, Bengsch didn't stop shouting that Lipowitz shouldn't work for Martinez, who has no chance anyway.
And now he'll talk about it for the remainder of the week. He still claims on a daily base that Kanter would have won in Abbruzzo if Lutsenko had not ruined his chances by going on the attack.
I believe Thomas was on the limit and I think that he said something similar on the post race interview.Why didn't Thomas work with O'Connor? Riding to power?
Why didn't Thomas work with O'Connor? Riding to power?
The post I was replying to was asking what makes Thomas unpopular. I was answering that question. If you don't think the train template tactic and defensive riding is part of that, I don't know what to say. I never said it was wrong or that they shouldn't ride that way if it's the best way to win - just that it's not a popular way of riding to win and is part of why many dislike Thomas.You could basically argue UAE or Jumbo are often employing exactly the same mountain train as Sky. Teams race like them or even Postal in GTs because it works. Yes, Pogacar can attack earlier or even attack at will because he's by far the strongest individual rider, a train isn't the only way to win a mountain finish, but UAE still essentially created a Sky train today that lasts long-enough to begin dropping second level GC riders weakens podium level and then launched Pogacar. This is exactly how Sky and Jumbo do it too.
Reading your comments, you rants generally seem to focus on team or rider nationality. I mean are you complaining Quintana has never faced the wind in his entire career as a wheel sucker? Mayne you have, but your posts seem more about nationality bias or some mythical style of racing that you think would be more entertaining when in reality it would be less effective so will never be realised.
Why didn't Thomas work with O'Connor? Riding to power?
Re the GCN commentary. On LBL when the had Rowe on for a bit, it was vomit inducing listening to Blythe trying to clean his hoop out. Now I have only listened to a couple of episodes of Rowe & Thomas podcast and that was enough. They're not very respectful of the peloton and like to slag people off. They're douches IMO.
I agree, Giro proves time and again 2-3 mins is not a guarantee of much. As always it will be the last week where the podium is decided, but Pogacar looking very strong in opening weel.
How are you gauging unpopular, I mean I'd say he wasn't unpopular across cycling fans, the peloton or other teams so it's nothing to do with how he races. As we saw today, he races with intelligence, he has to ride with what he has, not with what is entertaining for Libertine but loses him more time.The post I was replying to was asking what makes Thomas unpopular. I was answering that question. If you don't think the train template tactic and defensive riding is part of that, I don't know what to say. I never said it was wrong or that they shouldn't ride that way if it's the best way to win - just that it's not a popular way of riding to win and is part of why many dislike Thomas.
It's easy to characterise likes and dislikes along nationalistic lines if you only ever read or react to posts about Brits though, Sam.
And there are the Danes who actively exposed Rasmussen as a liar that had been in the Dolomites not Mexico and killed his 2007 Tour de France victory! 😄There tend to be two types of bias to that though.
There are some where they think their guys have a divine right to win, and if they aren't winning, it is automatically because they suck and should be sent straight to the gulag.
Then there are those that think their guys have a divine right to win, and if they aren't winning, it's because everybody else is cheating or they're somehow getting screwed.
Then there are those who will sell their guys as the plucky underdogs and the little engine that could such that every possible outcome is a triumph over adversity, even when they're the overwhelming favourites going into the race with a super-powered support squad.