It's also not like you can somewhat limit the fatigue but still make solid mountain stages. In fact, apart from Finestre, the Giro tends to accumulate more fatigue than action.
At least the Giro tries. I think the forum is too hard on the Giro.
It isn't therefore the forum complains about RCS and the Giro. I think the general opinion could have been far better with fewer height meters and a easier Giro in total if the design was better. Finishing at Abetone instead of Sestola. Doing a proper Monte Grappa towards Asiago. And doing a better combo of climbs towards Bormio. If that happened I think the forum would be happier even if the skipped either the San Valentino or the Champoluc stage and did a flat stage instead.Something different - like terms og makikg more accessible for riders and the double. But of course it requires more are trying
Of course I would like see a handfull more harshittera there like Manghen, Gavia, Stelvio. But to save the Giro we need to reduce the Tour..
I think this is such an understated point in these route threads. So often it seems like people just want the toughest route as possible and that doesn't necessarily make for better race (and isn't necessarily fair to the riders who you know, actually have to do the things we discuss). For me a smart route is one that is 1) as safe as possible 2) entertaining in terms of GC and day to day racing 3) takes some chances/novelties 4) provides for some good stages for fans to travel to the sport and catch a fun stage without feeling like they had to travel to Mars to do so and 5) Good on TV and 6) makes the organizers money because, it's a business.I think the 2015 route was in a sense quite easy, but its design induced harder racing, so less brutal terrain resulted in more fatigue than otherwise.
I totally agree on this point as well. We can complain about the Giro every day until May. The reality is, despite being clearly not the most elite Grand Tour and despite being an Italian race during an era without many (any?) top Italian GC guys, it has managed to not only keep it's prestige, I'd argue it has become a more prestigious race during the last 10 years. Sure some of that comes down to paying guys, like Froome and possibly Pog and probably eventually Jonas. But that get's us back to economics and why you have to finish in some of the places they finish. Plus, year in and year out, the Giro makes for the best racing of any Grand Tour. I think the same applies this year. Some of that has to do with the fact that it's not the Tour so the most elite heads of state won't target it every year and some of that has to do with Italy's geography but it's a darn good race to watch on TV year in and year out.At least the Giro tries. I think the forum is too hard on the Giro.
Nah, the last exciting Giro was 2018, each edition has gotten worse since IMO. From 2015-18 the Giro was easily the best grand Tour of the year in terms of racing. But team Sky boring the pants off us in the TDF was a big factor back then, those Giro's were exciting and unpredictable compared to the TDF.Plus, year in and year out, the Giro makes for the best racing of any Grand Tour.
In what way are they giftwrapping it for Evenepoel? 13.7km and 28.6km of ITT this year is not even that much. Compare that to what ASO did for Wiggins...The Giro tries what exactly? Apart from trying to giftwrap Evenepoel a pink jersey
Because every single mountain stage apart from a 2km section on stage 7 gives him forever to pull back lost time if he ever gets dropped on a steep section.In what way are they giftwrapping it for Evenepoel? 13.7km and 28.6km of ITT this year is not even that much. Compare that to what ASO did for Wiggins...
Just because there are some time trials in a route doesn't mean they are giftwrapping it. A GT isn't only about mountain stages, you are looking for the most complete rider that is able to ride at a high level for 3 full weeks.
Why would he get dropped on steep sections? You didn't watch TDF last year, or the Vuelta of 2022?Because every single mountain stage apart from a 2km section on stage 7 gives him forever to pull back lost time if he ever gets dropped on a steep section.
yup, an underrated feature of that Giro was the 60km time trial. the Astana leaders knew they would lose multiple minutes to Contador there so they had to attack everywhere they could.
This myth that Landa was a better climber needs to stop. In a easy climb like Abetone, Contador destroyed the field, even Aru was saved by Porte. Landa was dropped.that race showed we NEED 60km ITTs
Best climber did not win. But the best climber is not necessarily the best cyclist.
Start putting 130km of flat ITTs (2 60+ km ITTS plus a prologue). Gasp, if Pog has a TT like he did at the 2023 worlds, he can start the mountains 4 to5 minutes behind
That race would not have been much different with a 35km ITT.that race showed we NEED 60km ITTs
Best climber did not win. But the best climber is not necessarily the best cyclist.
Start putting 130km of flat ITTs (2 60+ km ITTS plus a prologue). Gasp, if Pog has a TT like he did at the 2023 worlds, he can start the mountains 4 to5 minutes behind
This myth that Landa was a better climber needs to stop. In a easy climb like Abetone, Contador destroyed the field, even Aru was saved by Porte. Landa was dropped.
Then Contador dislocated his shoulder and only in Finestre he was dropped (fair and square) by Landa.
- Campitello Mattese. Landa won time because of his free role. Contador was hurt and controlled Aru's attacks. Then when the pace dropped, Landa attacked and got away.
- Madonna di Campiglio was an obvious 2x1 and Contador was more worried about Aru because Landa lost 4 and half minutes against Contador.
- Mortirolo was Contador's magical comeback (1 minute behind). Landa was sucking his wheel until Aprica and then only won 38 seconds.
- Ologno: Contador's revenge. Completely destroyed Astana and Landa never was able to close the gap after his flat.
- Cervignia. The first time Contador was worried about Landa and guess what, Landa couldn't do anything. The opposite happened, Aru won time duento 2x1 strategy.
- Finestre: the only time Landa broke Contador fair and square.
But I want to add one thing. People who saw that Giro know Contador was racing alone against a super Astana. But he was really alone, many times Contador was alone against 4 or even 5 Astana guys. It was ridiculous. Landa would be that good (in the mountains) with zero support (water, tempo, etc) and after dislocating his shoulder? Of course not, Contador ALONE won that Giro. In 4 or 5 stages, Landa won the stage and/or time because Saxobank (or Tinkoff) was awful in supporting Contador in the mountains. Contador would be a double digit winner of GTs if he didn't choose his buddies to be his teammates.
That race would not have been much different with a 35km ITT.
Contador did had Igor Anton helping![]()
Yeah I could see this coming back to bite Pogacar in the future. You need your friends in cycling.Only Alberto Contador could inspire an outraged several paragraph defence of his Giro win in an unrelated thread 10 years later, they don't make them like him anymore.
Was quite a few along with Anton iirc. That stage like Fuente De was a brilliant example of how Contador understood the game of cycling, years of him being a generous and gracious cyclist, letting breaks go, giving away stages coming back around with multiple willing to help following Katusha/Astana's attempted mugging. If Pogacar or Vingegaard ended up in the same situation they would get laughed at.
Italian media are reporting the same.This year it's almost sure that there will be five wild cards so I think the two Italian pro teams and the two from Switzerland will participate. I think we will see Tom Pidcock and Marc Hirschi
www.cyclingnews.com
Saudi Arabian fund PIF will be the new main sponsor of the Pink Jersey. On the jersey you will find two writings: One Cycling and SURJ Sports Investment. Next week RCS will announce the wildcards and it seems they will be four.
