blaxland said:Strange start to the Giro...just my interpretations so far but does anybody else think that Bmc could be playing the Bluff card?I mean all riders except cadel were left behind in stage 3,maybe once the time gap was there, not bothering to chase thus saving energy required for the TTT?Could this be the masterstroke?Or is it just because Cadel has a week team?All in all a very exciting Giro so far bring on the Mountains..........
blaxland said:Strange start to the Giro...just my interpretations so far but does anybody else think that Bmc could be playing the Bluff card?I mean all riders except cadel were left behind in stage 3,maybe once the time gap was there, not bothering to chase thus saving energy required for the TTT?Could this be the masterstroke?Or is it just because Cadel has a week team?All in all a very exciting Giro so far bring on the Mountains..........
They did wait for Wiggins at the first crash he was involved in. Cervelo helped Cadel... gee must have missed that. It is part of cycling but it is just a cruel way to lose time.The Sheep said:The crash was in the last 10k so they didn't wait for the people behind. It's not like they waited on Wiggins yesterday either.
Also Cervelo had riders chasing with Cadel just not Sastre himself, it's what a team is for.
taiwan said:Could be both: they're not that strong, so let them off duty today to keep them as fresh as possible for the TTT which is more important. Taking a bit of a chance, but Cadel was able to handle himself really well in isolation in that second group.
powderpuff said:They did wait for Wiggins at the first crash he was involved in. Cervelo helped Cadel... gee must have missed that. It is part of cycling but it is just a cruel way to lose time.
Francois the Postman said:Normally I am sorta lukewarm about the opening stages, but this was great viewing, and we certainly are hitting Italy with an almost perfect set-up for fireworks.
<and much more>
Glad they brought the Tour here too. Could keep me more awake than usual during the first days.
danjo007 said:i couldnt care less about vino in pink. he doesnt desrve to be allowed back imo.
thehog said:I'm with you. There is no place for dopers in todays peloton.
![]()
Andre Greipel said:“You didn't do anything at all, you rotten dumbass,” cycling news
Francois the Postman said:Normally I am sorta lukewarm about the opening stages, but this was great viewing, and we certainly are hitting Italy with an almost perfect set-up for fireworks.
It's a shame some folk got really hurt on the road, but I totally disagree with the Eurosport commentators. To me the last two days highlighted what I really dislike in most stage races, that they are taking all risks out of racing by sticking to wide roads and perfect run-ins. Always felt they were neutering something that I think is part and parcel of a GT: endurance, trial, challenge.
Knowing that the end run ins are following the usual pattern, and cruising on great roads to it, it just breeds that calculated let's have an escape group dangling out there and then reel them comfortably in when it's "that time". A flat stage style that I hate, but have been forced to endure far far too often. Here, that really doesn't work as a race approach.
The only thing that would have worked, as pointed out, is to make the race on Dutch roads hard from the get-go, to make that big group smaller, and thus the road less risky. I know we have a long 3 weeks ahead of us. So what? Isn't it the point that no stage should be "comfortable, controllable and predictable? We got waaay to used to "the normal way" a 3 week GT rolls out. The last 2 days showed that that doesn't need to be the way. You don't even need tome bonuses to create interesting gaps artificially.
Everyone knew yard by yard where they would be racing. If they were so keen their main man really safe, teams were simply not deploying the right attack attitude: make the race a lot harder. They chose not to. And reaped the rewards for that attitude: Dutch lottery.
But why should only mountain stages run folk into the red in the last week and a bit?
It proved to me that the current crop of GT specialists, riders and directors, can learn a trick or two from the classic folk too: how to race here. We have started to specialize over the last decade and a bit. Well, please let that era come to end quickly if the stages can be this entertaining from the start.
As a group, they were bloody nervous, out of their comfort zone, and, ironically, too careful. And that was responsible for more crashes than anything the road threw at them.
And the main riders who actually have more all-round skills knew it. Even after yesterday's crash fest, the only thing I got from most interviews by the big names was that the nervousness was fingered more than the actual route taken.
So, to my delight, 2 great telly days. And we are having some great gaps, after the first 2 proper stages. And all we crossed was a pancake. Wow.
Glad they brought the Tour here too. Could keep me more awake than usual during the first days.
issoisso said:When there's a crash in the pack, it's a lot about dumb luck. Sastre and Wiggins were extremely well positioned yesterday....and the guy in front of them crashed and who got through? The guys who were at the back in bad positions.
When it's about skill in navigating the wind, I love it as much as anything else in this sport
When it's about arbitrary crashing because someone else made a mistake, that's not what sport is about. Sport is about being the best and the smartest, not about who can roll the dice and get a high number.
Greipel has to be the biggest jackass in the peloton. He had a perfect leadout and was in the right spot to take the win and he screwed the pooch big-time. He blew it like a rookie. And then he yells at Weylandts, who rode a beautiful sprint.Night Rider said:Boo f n hoo ... he did more than you ya gorilla, he won the stage.
When your team does anything more than set up sprint trains on flat stages for you and that other prat Cavendish then come back and complain that other riders don't do anything.
Otherwise if other riders want to sit in and take advantage of your one dimensional racing then good luck to them.
Tom T. said:Greipel has to be the biggest jackass in the peloton. He had a perfect leadout and was in the right spot to take the win and he screwed the pooch big-time. He blew it like a rookie. And then he yells at Weylandts, who rode a beautiful sprint.
cyclopeon said:This certainly doesn't help the arguement he was trying to make to become HTC's number 1 sprinter.
cyclopeon said:This certainly doesn't help the arguement he was trying to make to become HTC's number 1 sprinter.
danjo007 said:i couldnt care less about vino in pink.
Cobblestones said:Ok, let me contribute something useful:
GC watch:
1 Alexandre Vinokourov (Kaz) Astana 10:07:18
2 Richie Porte (Aus) Team Saxo Bank 0:00
3 David Millar (GBr) Garmin - Transitions 0:01
4 Vincenzo Nibali (Ita) Liquigas-Doimo 0:05
5 Marcel Sieberg (Ger) Team HTC - Columbia 0:07
8 Linus Gerdemann (Ger) Team Milram 0:12
9 Stefano Garzelli (Ita) Acqua & Sapone 0:15
11 Michele Scarponi (Ita) Androni Giocattoli 0:16
12 Vladimir Karpets (Rus) Team Katusha 0:17
14 Ivan Basso (Ita) Liquigas-Doimo 0:18
22 Graeme Brown (Aus) Rabobank 0:29
24 Cadel Evans (Aus) BMC Racing Team 0:43
37 Alexander Efimkin (Rus) AG2R La Mondiale 1:26
43 Carlos Sastre Candil (Spa) Cervelo Test Team 1:40
50 Damiano Cunego (Ita) Lampre-Farnese Vini 2:07
55 Bradley Wiggins (GBr) Sky Professional Cycling Team 4:28
135 Gilberto Simoni (Ita) Lampre-Farnese Vini 9:24
145 Domenico Pozzovivo (Ita) COG 9:30
178 Filippo Pozzato (Ita) Team Katusha 12:42
...Anyway, should be a starting point for discussion of the TTT.
Nearly said:Post of the day!(an inexplicably underrated GC rider - I am sure he will wipe away any remaining deficit on the Zoncolan and clearly has Cadel's number already
).
Nevertheless some seriously hard riding from Brownie thus far and showing the benefit of experience in these conditions.
