A Blythe:sublimit said:Yes well done to him..another rider i've never heard of and a great ride. more reading required on him by myself on that one.
i also agree its time for people to get off Vino's back and let him get on with his racing, and that includes me to be fair. **** knows what happened to Sky- a total disaster but they live to fight another day.
Looking for David Millar to grab pink in a couple of days time but Garmin may have lost Vandevelde for the TTT which is not good.
Cobblestones said:Ok, let me contribute something useful:
GC watch:
1 Alexandre Vinokourov (Kaz) Astana 10:07:18
2 Richie Porte (Aus) Team Saxo Bank 0:00
3 David Millar (GBr) Garmin - Transitions 0:01
4 Vincenzo Nibali (Ita) Liquigas-Doimo 0:05
5 Marcel Sieberg (Ger) Team HTC - Columbia 0:07
8 Linus Gerdemann (Ger) Team Milram 0:12
9 Stefano Garzelli (Ita) Acqua & Sapone 0:15
11 Michele Scarponi (Ita) Androni Giocattoli 0:16
12 Vladimir Karpets (Rus) Team Katusha 0:17
14 Ivan Basso (Ita) Liquigas-Doimo 0:18
22 Graeme Brown (Aus) Rabobank 0:29
24 Cadel Evans (Aus) BMC Racing Team 0:43
37 Alexander Efimkin (Rus) AG2R La Mondiale 1:26
43 Carlos Sastre Candil (Spa) Cervelo Test Team 1:40
50 Damiano Cunego (Ita) Lampre-Farnese Vini 2:07
55 Bradley Wiggins (GBr) Sky Professional Cycling Team 4:28
135 Gilberto Simoni (Ita) Lampre-Farnese Vini 9:24
145 Domenico Pozzovivo (Ita) COG 9:30
178 Filippo Pozzato (Ita) Team Katusha 12:42
Oh shucks, even with a typewriter font, I can't make it to line up. Text editor pwns me.
Anyway, should be a starting point for discussion of the TTT.
Cobblestones said:Ok, let me contribute something useful:
GC watch:
1 Alexandre Vinokourov (Kaz) Astana 10:07:18
2 Richie Porte (Aus) Team Saxo Bank 0:00
3 David Millar (GBr) Garmin - Transitions 0:01
4 Vincenzo Nibali (Ita) Liquigas-Doimo 0:05
5 Marcel Sieberg (Ger) Team HTC - Columbia 0:07
8 Linus Gerdemann (Ger) Team Milram 0:12
9 Stefano Garzelli (Ita) Acqua & Sapone 0:15
11 Michele Scarponi (Ita) Androni Giocattoli 0:16
12 Vladimir Karpets (Rus) Team Katusha 0:17
14 Ivan Basso (Ita) Liquigas-Doimo 0:18
22 Graeme Brown (Aus) Rabobank 0:29
24 Cadel Evans (Aus) BMC Racing Team 0:43
37 Alexander Efimkin (Rus) AG2R La Mondiale 1:26
43 Carlos Sastre Candil (Spa) Cervelo Test Team 1:40
50 Damiano Cunego (Ita) Lampre-Farnese Vini 2:07
55 Bradley Wiggins (GBr) Sky Professional Cycling Team 4:28
135 Gilberto Simoni (Ita) Lampre-Farnese Vini 9:24
145 Domenico Pozzovivo (Ita) COG 9:30
178 Filippo Pozzato (Ita) Team Katusha 12:42
Oh shucks, even with a typewriter font, I can't make it to line up. Text editor pwns me.
Anyway, should be a starting point for discussion of the TTT.
Luke Rowe is not struggling. Building a very solid palmares. Probably will graduate in 2012 to Sky, but if they take Kennaugh as a second year, dont see why not on Rowe.D Avoid said:I saw him as a junior a number of times, his sprint is superior, always took them, he could get away fairly easily, with only the best staying with him until the finish or dropping them before it. Second in the Hillingdon Grand prix against the best home based pros, that as a junior as well. Fierce fierce altogether, never noisy, loud or full of himself. His fellow graduates from that year are struggling in minor races in Europe,except for Kennaugh. I'm not sure how it works but some go stellar, while others go into catastrophic meltdown.
Do you have any idea what happened to them? Maybe they waited for Vande Velde? A bit quick to judge, I think.Dekker_Tifosi said:Bobdrige and Meyer in the 'mongolenwaaier' (the mongol echelon) at 14 minutes. These guys still have a lot to learn
trompe le monde said:Thanks. I was trying to find this information but the gazetta website seems to be slightly testa dura at the moment when it comes to obtaining overall GC standings.
Bit of a shame that Simoni is so far behind.
Moose McKnuckles said:As others have noted, perhaps the most important thing to come out of today's stage is the increased likelihood of massive attacks in the mountains.
Francois the Postman said:Normally I am sorta lukewarm about the opening stages, but this was great viewing, and we certainly are hitting Italy with an almost perfect set-up for fireworks.
It's a shame some folk got really hurt on the road, but I totally disagree with the Eurosport commentators. To me the last two days highlighted what I really dislike in most stage races, that they are taking all risks out of racing by sticking to wide roads and perfect run-ins. Always felt they were neutering something that I think is part and parcel of a GT: endurance, trial, challenge.
Knowing that the end run ins are following the usual pattern, and cruising on great roads to it, it just breeds that calculated let's have an escape group dangling out there and then reel them comfortably in when it's "that time". A flat stage style that I hate, but have been forced to endure far far too often. Here, that really doesn't work as a race approach.
The only thing that would have worked, as pointed out, is to make the race on Dutch roads hard from the get-go, to make that big group smaller, and thus the road less risky. I know we have a long 3 weeks ahead of us. So what? Isn't it the point that no stage should be "comfortable, controllable and predictable? We got waaay to used to "the normal way" a 3 week GT rolls out. The last 2 days showed that that doesn't need to be the way. You don't even need tome bonuses to create interesting gaps artificially.
Everyone knew yard by yard where they would be racing. If they were so keen their main man really safe, teams were simply not deploying the right attack attitude: make the race a lot harder. They chose not to. And reaped the rewards for that attitude: Dutch lottery.
But why should only mountain stages run folk into the red in the last week and a bit?
It proved to me that the current crop of GT specialists, riders and directors, can learn a trick or two from the classic folk too: how to race here. We have started to specialize over the last decade and a bit. Well, please let that era come to end quickly if the stages can be this entertaining from the start.
As a group, they were bloody nervous, out of their comfort zone, and, ironically, too careful. And that was responsible for more crashes than anything the road threw at them.
And the main riders who actually have more all-round skills knew it. Even after yesterday's crash fest, the only thing I got from most interviews by the big names was that the nervousness was fingered more than the actual route taken.
So, to my delight, 2 great telly days. And we are having some great gaps, after the first 2 proper stages. And all we crossed was a pancake. Wow.
Glad they brought the Tour here too. Could keep me more awake than usual during the first days.
I remember some nice echelon riding in last year's Tour, as well. It wasn't a very nice stage from a Dutch perspective (although this had nothing to do with the echelons) but spectacular nonetheless.Francois the Postman said:...
Glad they brought the Tour here too. Could keep me more awake than usual during the first days.
Francois the Postman said:Lots of words
Is this because you're Portuguese, and thus don't know how to appreciate the beauty of echelon riding?issoisso said:Just saw the stage.
Words cannot describe how *** these stages have been.
This is why I hate dangerous flat stages. They add absolutely nothing at all whatsoever except arbitratily crashing people.
Next time let's all stay home and throw darts at a board full of riders' names and say "you. broken collarbone. you. 50 second time loos. you. mangled face."
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
***
And that's not even going into what dopehead currently has the jersey.
Francois the Postman said:Normally I am sorta lukewarm about the opening stages, but this was great viewing, and we certainly are hitting Italy with an almost perfect set-up for fireworks.
It's a shame some folk got really hurt on the road, but I totally disagree with the Eurosport commentators. To me the last two days highlighted what I really dislike in most stage races, that they are taking all risks out of racing by sticking to wide roads and perfect run-ins. Always felt they were neutering something that I think is part and parcel of a GT: endurance, trial, challenge.
Knowing that the end run ins are following the usual pattern, and cruising on great roads to it, it just breeds that calculated let's have an escape group dangling out there and then reel them comfortably in when it's "that time". A flat stage style that I hate, but have been forced to endure far far too often. Here, that really doesn't work as a race approach.
The only thing that would have worked, as pointed out, is to make the race on Dutch roads hard from the get-go, to make that big group smaller, and thus the road less risky. I know we have a long 3 weeks ahead of us. So what? Isn't it the point that no stage should be "comfortable, controllable and predictable? We got waaay to used to "the normal way" a 3 week GT rolls out. The last 2 days showed that that doesn't need to be the way. You don't even need tome bonuses to create interesting gaps artificially.
Everyone knew yard by yard where they would be racing. If they were so keen their main man really safe, teams were simply not deploying the right attack attitude: make the race a lot harder. They chose not to. And reaped the rewards for that attitude: Dutch lottery.
But why should only mountain stages run folk into the red in the last week and a bit?
It proved to me that the current crop of GT specialists, riders and directors, can learn a trick or two from the classic folk too: how to race here. We have started to specialize over the last decade and a bit. Well, please let that era come to end quickly if the stages can be this entertaining from the start.
As a group, they were bloody nervous, out of their comfort zone, and, ironically, too careful. And that was responsible for more crashes than anything the road threw at them.
And the main riders who actually have more all-round skills knew it. Even after yesterday's crash fest, the only thing I got from most interviews by the big names was that the nervousness was fingered more than the actual route taken.
So, to my delight, 2 great telly days. And we are having some great gaps, after the first 2 proper stages. And all we crossed was a pancake. Wow.
Glad they brought the Tour here too. Could keep me more awake than usual during the first days.
theyoungest said:Is this because you're Portuguese, and thus don't know how to appreciate the beauty of echelon riding?
Dekker_Tifosi said:It's the wind that caused most contenders to lost 8 minutes though, not the falls....
It's not ***, it's cycling. Accept it or go cry
I'm just trying to understand why you didn't enjoy watching today's stage. Phrased it a bit bluntly though, sorry for that, but then again, *** *** *** ad infinitum is not that subtle either.issoisso said:What does one thing have to do with the other?
theyoungest said:I'm just trying to understand why you didn't enjoy watching today's stage. Phrased it a bit bluntly though, sorry for that, but then again, *** *** *** ad infinitum is not that subtle either.
I agree. And someone pointed out the wind did cause some major splits today.issoisso said:When there's a crash in the pack, it's a lot about dumb luck. Sastre and Wiggins were extremely well positioned yesterday....and the guy in front of them crashed and who got through? The guys who were at the back in bad positions.
When it's about skill in navigating the wind, I love it as much as anything else in this sport
When it's about arbitrary crashing because someone else made a mistake, that's not what sport is about. Sport is about being the best and the smartest, not about who can roll the dice and get a high number.
