- May 2, 2009
- 2,626
- 724
- 13,680
Re: Re:
Ask Frankie Andreu. He spent years chasing Pharmstrong after one doped up stage win after another to get a post stage quote, even though the guy was trying to ruin his life.
My take is there's a time and place for everything. I don't understand the notion that Lemond (or anyone else, for that matter) would be standing around post-race accusing everyone of being doped. I mean, what would be the point, unless the goal was to drive the entire sport into the ground.
Benotti69 said:red_flanders said:Benotti69 said:The way LeMond seems to have no problem with any dopers bar Armstrong really makes me doubt he rode clean.
That is quite honestly the dumbest, in a long, long history of dumb, unsupported accusations against LeMond. Chapeau.
Thanks.
I find it hard to watch LeMond talk about Pantani, Contador, Nibali and these guys and ignore the bleeding obvious.
I find it hypocritical that he went after Armstrong but rides around Paris in a car containing Merckx, Indurain and Hinault who all doped and prior to the 'reasoned decision' defended Armstrong.
That doesn't make LeMond a proven doper, but it sure makes him a hypocrite and if he has no problem with their wins, why is that? In this sport it sure doesn't point me in a direction that makes one think oh he was clean......and I used to think yep LeMond was THE clean winner of the modern era! Now I doubt it.
Ask Frankie Andreu. He spent years chasing Pharmstrong after one doped up stage win after another to get a post stage quote, even though the guy was trying to ruin his life.
My take is there's a time and place for everything. I don't understand the notion that Lemond (or anyone else, for that matter) would be standing around post-race accusing everyone of being doped. I mean, what would be the point, unless the goal was to drive the entire sport into the ground.
