- Mar 15, 2013
- 494
- 0
- 0
Netserk said:How many TVs has Cav won? 0. How well did he do in the stage Degenkolb won? 127th.
IMO, a points competition shouldn't be decided by winning TV's. And that stage was the only stage within his reach he didn't win
Netserk said:How many TVs has Cav won? 0. How well did he do in the stage Degenkolb won? 127th.
Roderick said:But wouldn't you say that cav was more regular since he practically won everything that suited him and cuddles was pretty much meh in the stages that suited him. He got a lot of top-6 in sprints nobody really cared about
EDIT: Cause this Giro was definately not balanced out between sprint/climb-stages
Roderick said:Indeed, it isn't right that someone who wins 5 stages (if Cav wins in brescia, which he probably will) loses to someone with a 2nd place and 9 other top-6 (if cuddles gets another three top-6 which wouldn't be surprising)
5 wins should always be >>>>>>>> 10 top-6
Libertine Seguros said:There were plenty of stages which were much more selective than they first appeared, as the racing at this Giro has been much more aggressive than anticipated, partially thanks to the weather. If Cavendish could make it to the end of stage 13 to win it, would it really have been too surprising had he made it in the bunch to pick up minor points at least on the stage Paolini won, or today's stage, if they were raced less aggressively?
The Hitch said:So what should be done. Give less points for mountains. TDF do that. And Cav only won the jersey once.
Roderick said:The stage Paolini won definitely not. Today's stage maybe, but if you see that he came in 49th after such a steep hill, that's pretty amazing for a pure sprinter like cav
Roderick said:The stage Paolini won definitely not. Today's stage maybe, but if you see that he came in 49th after such a steep hill, that's pretty amazing for a pure sprinter like cav
Roderick said:But wouldn't you say that cav was more regular
autologous said:Cav is quite regular : in a full 75% of the stages so far he is totally invisible.
Consistent!
Libertine Seguros said:They experimented with biasing the time last year, giving no time bonuses in mountain stages but bonuses in flat stages. It didn't work.
The thing is, the GC isn't biased: all stages pay the same bonuses and time is standard - and unlike the Tour the points competition isn't biased either: all stages pay the same points.
The Tour has biased the points system to try to generate a better competition among the sprinters, the Giro and Vuelta maintain the old system of rewarding consistency. Neither is wrong per se, they're just different. It means that a sprinter has to be multi-faceted to win all three points jerseys, and it makes it more of an achievement to do it. Cav gets (or got) a lot of criticism for being a one-trick pony; he isn't. Winning the points jersey on a balanced Giro parcours would just be the final nail in the coffin of that accusation.
King Boonen said:Evans can now be given rope on the remaining stages, might get a win still.
Red Rick said:How far is Nibali back for this jersey?
Red Rick said:How far is Nibali back for this jersey?
Waterloo Sunrise said:Yeah, a guy in 2nd will be given rope, Sky will have no interest in taking the 10 seconds they need on him.
