Giro d'Italia Giro Stage 5: Modena – Cattolica 175 km

Page 10 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

Will it be a sprint?


  • Total voters
    42
May 11, 2013
13,995
5,289
28,180
Must be terrible to be a Landa fan. He's up there with Richie in the bad luck department. It is hard to explain logically how it's possible to be so many times in the wrong place at the wrong time. Obviously I feel sorry for him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan and Lui98
Dec 9, 2019
693
828
7,180
Feb 1, 2011
9,403
2,275
20,680
Or maybe it is.

There was nothing he could have done there.

I'd have to watch a replay, but no reason to doubt you on this specifically. I was speaking more generally.

It's curious how some riders crash a lot more often than others.
 
Apr 16, 2009
17,600
6,854
28,180
Sorry, no. Although I agree in general that bike handling is part of the job, this was a really dangerous finale after such an easy stage - many, many harsh bends, roundabouts, lots of narrowings and divisions, constantly roads got narrow, than broad again.
If you know there is no way out of a bunch sprint anyway, why then have such last 15k? You KNOW 100% that crashes will happen. In a GT that's just not necessary.
I have seen many races BlueRoads and this one did not look any different from many others. Gosh, in Europe almost every finish looks like this and we complain always of the same. It is part of the races unless they start doing the finishes outside the cities!
 
Jul 25, 2012
12,967
1,970
25,680
Yes, I was about to say that this was the Scheldeprijs of GT stages.
At least at Scheldeprijs everyone getting hurt has a role in the sprint finish. GC riders getting taken out in boring stages they're not even involved in is really, really annoying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shalgo
Apr 27, 2014
962
249
10,380
This stages are *. Just put some easy climbs before the finish to soften the legs. But in this way riders get to the finish too much hot.
 
Feb 20, 2012
53,942
44,327
28,180
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: search and Luthor
Feb 1, 2011
9,403
2,275
20,680
Btw as much as I would have enjoyed him winning - borderline dangerous sprint from Nizzolo, that swing across the entire road basically was questionable imo.
 
Jul 25, 2012
12,967
1,970
25,680
So gutted for Landa. Good for UCI they ban the supertuck but they can't do anything to ensure we get safer finishes in these stages. Vegni complains about too many teams, also doesn't give a damn that maybe the peloton is too large and they should take that into account.

View: https://twitter.com/laflammerouge16/status/1392505476919832583
It's a separate debate, but I think long, straight finishes with no bends can be just as dangerous because more teams can get involved. It's been discussed before but really they need to find a better way of getting the GC guys out of the way. It'll probably lead to more competitive sprinting too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Sep 2, 2011
17,543
13,767
28,180
Unless he was next to the front. Or was he next to the front?
Is there any evidence that being next to the front lowers the risk of crashing in sprint stages (or any other kind of stage really)?

Sivakov crashed while he was in the first 30 positions of the bunch.
 
Feb 20, 2012
53,942
44,327
28,180
It's a separate debate, but I think long, straight finishes with no bends can be just as dangerous because more teams can get involved. It's been discussed before but really they need to find a better way of getting the GC guys out of the way. It'll probably lead to more competitive sprinting too.
Just take the time at 5km except if there's an uphill finish. If there's an uphill sprint, cap the time loss that can happen due to a mechanical/crash
 
Jul 2, 2019
1,179
2,094
8,680
It's a separate debate, but I think long, straight finishes with no bends can be just as dangerous because more teams can get involved. It's been discussed before but really they need to find a better way of getting the GC guys out of the way. It'll probably lead to more competitive sprinting too.
I legitimately think the GC teams should just have a gentleman's agreement to neutralize things between them and hang out behind the sprint trains. The trend which started last decade of GC teams massing at the front to get their riders to the 3KM barrier has kind of led to this kind of arms race.

Sprinting and flat stages have already been marginalized enough, we don't need any more special treatment for climbers.
 
Jul 25, 2012
12,967
1,970
25,680
Is there any evidence that being next to the front lowers the risk of crashing in sprint stages (or any other kind of stage really)?

Sivakov crashed while he was in the first 30 positions of the bunch.
It'll lower the odds of you getting taken down when others crash, purely because there's less people infront who could crash. Whether it lowers the odds of you crashing yourself is a different matter.
 
Aug 5, 2009
15,733
8,160
28,180
Always the flat stages that weed out the GC contenders. Never fails. Silly crashes Just a lack of concentration.