^^That sounds good, especially since the MTF would be before the downhill finish instead of after it.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Thats actually true. Ugh.McLovin said:So a lot of 2012 Tour, again: PdBF, Grand Colombier in the middle of nowhere, Mur de Peguere, Peyragaudes. Climbs were first used on that Tour and again now.
I am sure they will celebrate Giro somehow.
But not necessarily bad. PdBF was so bad because it was a one climb stage which doesn't have to be the case this year. Grand Colombier was so bad because it was the only hard climb of the day, while this time it would be all about the great Mont du Chat anyway. Mur de Peguere was only bad because they did the stupid extra lap around Foix and Peyragudes isn't bad anyway.Valv.Piti said:Thats actually true. Ugh.McLovin said:So a lot of 2012 Tour, again: PdBF, Grand Colombier in the middle of nowhere, Mur de Peguere, Peyragaudes. Climbs were first used on that Tour and again now.
I am sure they will celebrate Giro somehow.
What do you meanRed Rick said:How about when you have a **** idea, you come up with something that's not ****, instead of trying to hide that it's ****
Gigs_98 said:But not necessarily bad. PdBF was so bad because it was a one climb stage which doesn't have to be the case this year. Grand Colombier was so bad because it was the only hard climb of the day, while this time it would be all about the great Mont du Chat anyway. Mur de Peguere was only bad because they did the stupid extra lap around Foix and Peyragudes isn't bad anyway.Valv.Piti said:Thats actually true. Ugh.McLovin said:So a lot of 2012 Tour, again: PdBF, Grand Colombier in the middle of nowhere, Mur de Peguere, Peyragaudes. Climbs were first used on that Tour and again now.
I am sure they will celebrate Giro somehow.
There is nothing certain in this life. This year and last year was fit for Quintana and you saw what happened. So bring on any route. Force the other teams to do different things.sir fly said:If the route stays according to the rumours, I believe ASO's idea is to serve Tour - Vuelta double to Froome.
It's not like he doesn't stand a chance on the harder routes, just the fact they'll throw a route clearly in his favour after the opposition hasn't showed they can capitalize on the routes inclined towards them.
The unknown parts of the route need to be something in order to avoid disappointment.
Well, what organizers can do is to set the route that would bring suspense. Everything else is on riders.Escarabajo said:There is nothing certain in this life. This year and last year was fit for Quintana and you saw what happened. So bring on any route. Force the other teams to do different things.sir fly said:If the route stays according to the rumours, I believe ASO's idea is to serve Tour - Vuelta double to Froome.
It's not like he doesn't stand a chance on the harder routes, just the fact they'll throw a route clearly in his favour after the opposition hasn't showed they can capitalize on the routes inclined towards them.
The unknown parts of the route need to be something in order to avoid disappointment.
guncha said:Do I read it correctly that after stage 12 to Peyragudes the next meaningful mountain stage for GC will be stage 17 to Serre Chevalier?
Mur de Peugere will make sence as MTF only. Even without loop it will be too far from finish to create gaps. Second week looks weak.mikii4567 said:guncha said:Do I read it correctly that after stage 12 to Peyragudes the next meaningful mountain stage for GC will be stage 17 to Serre Chevalier?
Stage 13 may be mountainous, including Mur de Peugere, and end in Foix, after the descent. Thing is, if they do the loop around town, like in 2012, nothing will happen. After that, the next mountain stage will probably be 17 (stage 16 could be medium-mountain)
Netserk said:The sad thing is that we see proper mountain stages even more rarely than proper ITTs in the Tour. As it is now, one of the hardest mountain stages recently was 138km and with only 1 HC climb
I'm not (necessarily) asking for the epic of old, but really when are we to see proper hard stages where the attacks will/should come further from the finish than the last 5km?
It's not like France doesn't have the geography for it.
*From the upcoming Netserk Fantasy Tour
Don't tell me 30km up and down is too much after Mont-Noir to see the contenders attack there. (If they need time)
That would be great stage. It looks more like a Giro stage.Netserk said:The sad thing is that we see proper mountain stages even more rarely than proper ITTs in the Tour. As it is now, one of the hardest mountain stages recently was 138km and with only 1 HC climb
I'm not (necessarily) asking for the epic of old, but really when are we to see proper hard stages where the attacks will/should come further from the finish than the last 5km?
It's not like France doesn't have the geography for it.
*From the upcoming Netserk Fantasy Tour
Don't tell me 30km up and down is too much after Mont-Noir to see the contenders attack there. (If they need time)