They had to be first at the last turn, but they let a gap at the insideJagartrott said:Sunweb played it poorly. They should've just let Sky dangle 2 seconds in front and then blow past them at the finish.
RedheadDane said:My personal verdict of this:
Nice idea, definitely needs some improvement.
Dekker_Tifosi said:LOL
Zes ploegen hebben een tijdstraf van vijf minuten ontvangen vanwege stayeren. Het gaat om LottoNL-Jumbo, Lotto Soudal, Nippo-Vini Fantini, Cannondale-Drapac, Movistar en Orica-Scott. De tijdstraf geldt alleen voor de daguitslag van vandaag.
Naast de eindzege gaat ook de dagzege naar Sky. Zij werkten het 44,7 kilometer lange parcours af in 51 minuten en 59 seconden. Sunweb eindigt als tweede in de daguitslag, één seconde achter Sky. Quick-Step reed in de B-groep naar een tijd van 52 minuten en 38 seconden.
--
Basically means that aside from Sunweb and Sky, everybody got a 5 minute time penalty in the finale
Dekker_Tifosi said:LOL
Zes ploegen hebben een tijdstraf van vijf minuten ontvangen vanwege stayeren. Het gaat om LottoNL-Jumbo, Lotto Soudal, Nippo-Vini Fantini, Cannondale-Drapac, Movistar en Orica-Scott. De tijdstraf geldt alleen voor de daguitslag van vandaag.
Naast de eindzege gaat ook de dagzege naar Sky. Zij werkten het 44,7 kilometer lange parcours af in 51 minuten en 59 seconden. Sunweb eindigt als tweede in de daguitslag, één seconde achter Sky. Quick-Step reed in de B-groep naar een tijd van 52 minuten en 38 seconden.
--
Basically means that aside from Sunweb and Sky, everybody got a 5 minute time penalty in the finale
Beech Mtn said:If this were a race that mattered, I'd think Orica would be pissed about that. They mostly seemed to get drafted on rather than drafting other people. Only saw them behind Lotto-Soudal briefly, but then we didn't see enough of the peloton.
Organizers are partly at fault for the drafting too.
William H said:Honestly, they should just ditch the "no drafting" rule. Or maybe hold the event on a motorway. I don't see how its fairly enforceable on a vaguely technical course.
Generally, or by Dutch media?Eviter said:OF course Dutch media and pundits called this a great spectacle, but they didn't thought that TTT through. Which is strange because the Dutch teams that had a lead in this are known for the professionalism.
Dekker_Tifosi said:Naast de eindzege gaat ook de dagzege naar Sky. Zij werkten het 44,7 kilometer lange parcours af in 51 minuten en 59 seconden. Sunweb eindigt als tweede in de daguitslag, één seconde achter Sky. Quick-Step reed in de B-groep naar een tijd van 52 minuten en 38 seconden.
In addition to the final victory, the day goes to Sky. They completed the 44.7 kilometer long course in 51 minutes and 59 seconds. Sunweb finishes second in the dayout, one second behind Sky. Quick-Step drove in the B group to a time of 52 minutes and 38 seconds.
That's ridiculous. Reminds me of the XC skiing I see on Eurosport sometimes, where athletes start a second event with time gaps established in an earlier event, and the one to cross the line first wins the 2nd event. It makes no sense to me, surely the winner is the one who got through the course the fastest.Armchair cyclist said:Dekker_Tifosi said:Naast de eindzege gaat ook de dagzege naar Sky. Zij werkten het 44,7 kilometer lange parcours af in 51 minuten en 59 seconden. Sunweb eindigt als tweede in de daguitslag, één seconde achter Sky. Quick-Step reed in de B-groep naar een tijd van 52 minuten en 38 seconden.
Google translate:
In addition to the final victory, the day goes to Sky. They completed the 44.7 kilometer long course in 51 minutes and 59 seconds. Sunweb finishes second in the dayout, one second behind Sky. Quick-Step drove in the B group to a time of 52 minutes and 38 seconds.
How can they publish a classification for the day that is based on time gaps established on the previous two days?
Either credit Sunweb for having done today's stage fastest (31" faster than Sky), or have the honesty to say that there is no stage classification for day 3.
yaco said:Need to introduce a rule that once a team is passed in the TTT, the team passed, must sit up for 3 seconds - This means the stronger team will usually ride away.
LaFlorecita said:That's ridiculous. Reminds me of the XC skiing I see on Eurosport sometimes, where athletes start a second event with time gaps established in an earlier event, and the one to cross the line first wins the 2nd event. It makes no sense to me, surely the winner is the one who got through the course the fastest.Armchair cyclist said:Dekker_Tifosi said:Naast de eindzege gaat ook de dagzege naar Sky. Zij werkten het 44,7 kilometer lange parcours af in 51 minuten en 59 seconden. Sunweb eindigt als tweede in de daguitslag, één seconde achter Sky. Quick-Step reed in de B-groep naar een tijd van 52 minuten en 38 seconden.
Google translate:
In addition to the final victory, the day goes to Sky. They completed the 44.7 kilometer long course in 51 minutes and 59 seconds. Sunweb finishes second in the dayout, one second behind Sky. Quick-Step drove in the B group to a time of 52 minutes and 38 seconds.
How can they publish a classification for the day that is based on time gaps established on the previous two days?
Either credit Sunweb for having done today's stage fastest (31" faster than Sky), or have the honesty to say that there is no stage classification for day 3.