- Feb 20, 2010
- 33,064
- 15,272
- 28,180
To catch bilharzia?sniper said:It's a dangerous place. athletes go there for one reason only.
To catch bilharzia?sniper said:It's a dangerous place. athletes go there for one reason only.
Caruut said:I would really like to see her compete against the men, going OT a bit. Perhaps a post-Tour crit or something?
Willy_Voet said:I'm not sure the big fish/small bond argument works. If I doped I would crush everyone on the Saturday morning ride. Plus, there are plenty of women riders who do test positive.
Willy_Voet said:Not sure the TT argument works, either. Johan Museeuw and Frank Schleck were/are pretty terrible TT riders. (Of course, Frank only was thinking about doping and never actually got around to doing it or something like that)
qwerty16 said:
Athletes that I know have gone there for several reasons:sniper said:athletes go there for one reason only.
There are lots and lots of places in this World to train in warm weather. If she is going to fly 7000 miles to do that, she should just fly to San Diego. Or even Austin. Both those places are a lot closer and are a much safer place to ride a bike than in South Africa. Plus, she could get used to the food, culture and time zone here in the US, where the race she is training for, Cyclo-X Worlds, is being held. The whole South African thing just stinks.
oldcrank said:Athletes that I know have gone there for several reasons:
1. Watch the World Cup of Soccer
2. Participate in World Masters Athletics Championships
3. Compete in UCI World Cup of Track Cycling
4. Watch Rugby
5. Participate in a friendly Cricket series
6. Holiday
7. Spread the ashes of a dear friend that passed abroad
8. Participate in the Comrades Marathon
Which was the one reason you are referring to?
GPdesAmeriques said:The World Championships are in early February. So Vos is going to train in the USA for two months eating lots of Kentucky Fried Chicken?
I think I read the training camp is for the KNWU or Rabobank Women's road team. It's nothing to do with cyclocross.
oldcrank said:Athletes that I know have gone there for several reasons:
1. Watch the World Cup of Soccer
2. Participate in World Masters Athletics Championships
3. Compete in UCI World Cup of Track Cycling
4. Watch Rugby
5. Participate in a friendly Cricket series
6. Holiday
7. Spread the ashes of a dear friend that passed abroad
8. Participate in the Comrades Marathon
Which was the one reason you are referring to?
sniper said:exactly, training is not a reason. thanks for confirming.
exactly, training is not a reason. thanks for confirming.oldcrank said:Athletes that I know have gone there for several reasons:
1. Watch the World Cup of Soccer
2. Participate in World Masters Athletics Championships
3. Compete in UCI World Cup of Track Cycling
4. Watch Rugby
5. Participate in a friendly Cricket series
6. Holiday
7. Spread the ashes of a dear friend that passed abroad
8. Participate in the Comrades Marathon
Which was the one reason you are referring to?
Dear Wiggo said:What are the legal implications of doping in SA? Training camp locations are favoured for
1. training: road quality - diversity and lack of traffic with hills
2. training: hotel quality + price + possibly altitude
3. training: other riders / motor pacer / racing opportunities
4. doping: remoteness / limited airport / routes in - simple vampire detection
5. doping: access to medical help / products
6. doping: legality of doping product possession or use
7. training: weather - warm and dry
If Kenyan runners can dope in Kenya, a more affluent South Africa can surely afford similar medical staff and products.
sniper said:however, i'm not sure if i understand the climate-related argument (7): do you really want to train in a warm and dry climate if only a small percentage of the races per year take place in such a climate?
this question is of course not just wrt southafrica, also wrt tenerife and spain, where the general argument is always "we go there for the good weather".
sniper said:another plus could be:
however, i'm not sure if i understand the climate-related argument (7)...
Dear Wiggo said:(snipped)
peterst6906 said:(snipped)
Benotti69 said:For those doubting the reasons for a woman cyclist to dope, i ask you to remember Jeannie Longo.
peterst6906 said:Weather also relates to the daylight hours.
Moving into winter in The Netherlands the days become short and the weather is wet; neither of which is conducive to good base training.
In SA, instead of the days shortening to around 7 hours of daylight, the days are becoming longer and moving towards 15 hours of daylight.
veganrob said:If Vos does not want to train in Netherlands that is certainly her perogative. She can go wherever shw wants. However. She does not need base training at this point she needs more CX specific training.
And 7 hours of daylight is not enough to accomplish this?
Benotti69 said:Steve Tilford criticises Vos for heading to south Africa to train for World XC champs.
It maybe Vos is way ahead of the competition becuase like others she has taken a dark path to glory.
stevetilford.com.
I agree that perception is as big a dot to connect as testing positive.
GreggGermer said:Having been to South Africa for two periods of training I did so not for doping but because I had 1) A free place to crash with a friend 2) Consistent weather for training in winter 3) Great training with lots of climbing and altitude 4) Others who I could train with almost every day (where I lived in Houston had no one in my area who were able to train with in the week, it made the 5 hour days on the bike soooo boring.) So I welcome the change of scenery SA provided. Also the early season races are only 100k long, so they are hard, but not to long and you can get in some early races while continuing your base. I never found it any more dangerous than most big cities in the US, you just used some extra caution.
So, no, you don't specifically go to SA for doping (but I'm sure it happens).
So your guys argument that SA training = doping is just speculation (a favorite past time of the Clinic). Vos is women's cycling's Merckx. Through the grapevine of the cycling world I've heard how hard she prepares and trains, those around her have always proclaimed her to be good because of her work ethic, not doping.
Just my 2 cents ...
