IAAF covered up 4 positives by Mo Farah?!

Page 3 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Re: Re:

Farcanal said:
the sceptic said:
Farcanal said:
The Hitch said:
GuyIncognito said:
...aaaand the IAAF gala is cancelled
Not sure that's neccesarily related.

I'm still sceptical. Heart been broken too many times ;)

Why has your heart been broken? In what are you investing so much emotional energy? Serious question

I would love a top level british athlete to be busted for doping? Wouldn't you?

I'd like anybody who is cheating to be 'busted', why insert top level or British in your adjectives? That very description makes me think that those factors are more important to you than whether the person is cheating.
Considering that the current head of WADA (Reedie) and the current head of the IAAF (Coe) are both British, as well as the athlete in question I think it's perfectly acceptable to hope that Farah gets busted. Many here are sick and tired of nations protecting their own.
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
Re:

The Hitch said:
lol sceptic. That was my reaction as well.

But I remember the Nibali is going to get caught doping story 2 years ago, and how excited we were and on the brink it all seemed, so from experience, I think its better to wait and see what happens. Would be amazing if true.

but this is about power, and power is about politics, and vested interests. See: how Radcliffe's blood has sunk like an anchor.

Remember all the myacera positives in the 2007 Tour that were leaked out, why did they only bust Piepoli and Ricco when 7 out of 9 csc riders were on it, and about 30 were positive to the myacera during that Tour. Why did they only bust the expedient smallfry?

edit:typo bust from bus
 
Re:

SeriousSam said:
I really hope this is true but I hardly dare wish it.

My crackpot theory is head of Russian athletic federation is not happy about brunt blamed for the bribery. Rumor is he was at an IAAF meeting performing treasurer duties very recently.

Of course the allegations are true. Paula Radcliffe has apparently gone silent on social media just in time.

Coe knew nothing as second in command??? He's got huge problems now. How will he get his bribes!????!?!
 
Re: Re:

blackcat said:
The Hitch said:
lol sceptic. That was my reaction as well.

But I remember the Nibali is going to get caught doping story 2 years ago, and how excited we were and on the brink it all seemed, so from experience, I think its better to wait and see what happens. Would be amazing if true.

but this is about power, and power is about politics, and vested interests. See: how Radcliffe's blood has sunk like an anchor.

Remember all the myacera positives in the 2007 Tour that were leaked out, why did they only bus Piepoli and Ricco when 7 out of 9 csc riders were on it, and about 30 were positive to the myacera during that Tour. Why did they only bust the expedient smallfry?
Piepoli, Schumacher, Kohl and of course Ricco put in performances so ridiculous they were both impossible to ignore and the perfect busts, they were so obvious.

They also served as a warning to the rest of the peloton - keep it in your pants.
 
Mar 11, 2009
1,005
0
0
Isn't this actually bad news to anti-doping? Wouldn't the first defense be this guy is creating fake positives and then extorting people?
 
Anybody accused of doping would demand to see the test results. I don't think it would be possible to extort money from a clean athlete. We see how all the guilty ones howl and claim innocent and wait for the B sample etc, etc
 
Re: sweet fa

ebandit said:
thehog said:
So has the British Press picked up on this story as yet? :rolleyes:


..........nothing on google search/beeb website................ask baron coe

he will confirm........russian attempt to drag clean brits into the mire.........


Mark L

If only there was an investigative journalist who would stop at nothing!?? He'd get to the bottom of a story like this :rolleyes:
 
Re: sweet fa

thehog said:
ebandit said:
thehog said:
So has the British Press picked up on this story as yet? :rolleyes:


..........nothing on google search/beeb website................ask baron coe

he will confirm........russian attempt to drag clean brits into the mire.........


Mark L

If only there was an investigative journalist who would stop at nothing!?? He'd get to the bottom of a story like this :rolleyes:
I knew a guy who claimed to be just like that. When push came to shove though he said he didn't want to hurt Dopers by outing them as Dopers. Turns out getting caught doping is not a just punishment for people who merely doped.
 
Re: sweet fa

The Hitch said:
thehog said:
ebandit said:
thehog said:
So has the British Press picked up on this story as yet? :rolleyes:


..........nothing on google search/beeb website................ask baron coe

he will confirm........russian attempt to drag clean brits into the mire.........


Mark L

If only there was an investigative journalist who would stop at nothing!?? He'd get to the bottom of a story like this :rolleyes:
I knew a guy who claimed to be just like that. When push came to shove though he said he didn't want to hurt Dopers by outing them as Dopers. Turns out getting caught doping is not a just punishment for people who merely doped.

Don't worry I'm sure he'll remind Alex Gibney that he became a fanboy of Lance thus a poor journalist.

Nevertheless I'm this journalist is working on the Radcliffe story as we speak.
 
Mar 11, 2009
1,005
0
0
Re: Re:

del1962 said:
Nick C. said:
Isn't this actually bad news to anti-doping? Wouldn't the first defense be this guy is creating fake positives and then extorting people?

Why bother creating them if there are enough already to bribe, producing fake ones may bring in all sorts of complications
You are assuming a logical ethical world. This seems to be anything but. If someone has their hand out with real ones presumably the need or hunger for cash is great. They are already being unscrupulous so why not.
 
Re: Re:

Nick C. said:
del1962 said:
Nick C. said:
Isn't this actually bad news to anti-doping? Wouldn't the first defense be this guy is creating fake positives and then extorting people?

Why bother creating them if there are enough already to bribe, producing fake ones may bring in all sorts of complications
You are assuming a logical ethical world. This seems to be anything but. If someone has their hand out with real ones presumably the need or hunger for cash is great. They are already being unscrupulous so why not.

Logical perhaps, how though is bribing ethical?

It just doesn't make sense to fabricate failed tests for bribes when you can bribe those who actually bribe those who failed a test, lot easier to get your money this way, seems though that in the case of the female 1500m Olympic Champion Diack overcharged
 
roundabout said:
This sounds more like a typical Russian response of "wah, the others are doing the same" regardless of any proof when being shamed for something in public.

Typical Russian response?

Russians never complain. It's the British who are known to complain about everything :rolleyes:
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
Re: Re:

42x16ss said:
Piepoli, Schumacher, Kohl and of course Ricco put in performances so ridiculous they were both impossible to ignore and the perfect busts, they were so obvious.

They also served as a warning to the rest of the peloton - keep it in your pants.
yep good point

was that the year with Vandevelde and Kim Kirchen also riding high up on GC? They shoulda busted Kirchen, he almost killed himself before the end of the decade
 
Jul 29, 2015
6
0
3,530
roundabout said:
This sounds more like a typical Russian response of "wah, the others are doing the same" regardless of any proof when being shamed for something in public.
Exactly. That piece about Farah looks like disinformation. In the first paragraphs a very colorful picture of corruption in the IAAF and there are many details. But it took only one little sentence about Fara. There are no any details, no dates of the failed tests, no specific drugs, nothing at all. Russian media never had an inside information about doping with the athletes from the other countries before. Moreover Parisotto and Ashenden had the access to his data and found nothing abnormal. Logically we can assume that it's just fake.
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
thehog said:
roundabout said:
This sounds more like a typical Russian response of "wah, the others are doing the same" regardless of any proof when being shamed for something in public.

Typical Russian response?

Russians never complain. It's the British who are known to complain about everything :rolleyes:

russians get even.
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
Re: sweet fa

thehog said:
Don't worry I'm sure he'll remind Alex Gibney that he became a fanboy of Lance thus a poor journalist.

Nevertheless I'm this journalist is working on the Radcliffe story as we speak.

Hog you are with me. you wish to watch the first documentary that Gibney made on Lance.

This is the true documentary, the meta truth, about how Gibney and everyone else are complicit in the lie and the suppression of disbelief.

I would hope Assange and Wikileaks can get hold of the first documentary, the true one, before Alex Gibney re-cut it to save face.

*intentional use of truth. You have to peel back the charade(s) to see how the world works
 
Re: Re:

blackcat said:
42x16ss said:
Piepoli, Schumacher, Kohl and of course Ricco put in performances so ridiculous they were both impossible to ignore and the perfect busts, they were so obvious.

They also served as a warning to the rest of the peloton - keep it in your pants.
yep good point

was that the year with Vandevelde and Kim Kirchen also riding high up on GC? They shoulda busted Kirchen, he almost killed himself before the end of the decade
Yeah, Vandevelde was 5th IIRC and Kirchen 8th. Former superdoms taking the reigns, with some good old superdoping.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
theroadrunner said:
roundabout said:
This sounds more like a typical Russian response of "wah, the others are doing the same" regardless of any proof when being shamed for something in public.
Exactly. That piece about Farah looks like disinformation. In the first paragraphs a very colorful picture of corruption in the IAAF and there are many details. But it took only one little sentence about Fara. There are no any details, no dates of the failed tests, no specific drugs, nothing at all. Russian media never had an inside information about doping with the athletes from the other countries before. Moreover Parisotto and Ashenden had the access to his data and found nothing abnormal. Logically we can assume that it's just fake.

Mo is cleans i tell ya!! Never tested positive!

If the Russians are doping you can be sure everyone else is.

At start of 2015, Italy 62 doping bans in Olympic sports, Russia second with 55. US, GB, France and Kenya in top 10. Not just Russian problem.
 
Jul 29, 2015
6
0
3,530
Benotti69 said:
Mo is cleans i tell ya!! Never tested positive!
I'm not saying he's clean or not. I don't know. My point: this information is not credible.

And 4 failed and covered doping tests is too much. Why not 14 or 40? Probably even Lance Armstrong had less. :)
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
theroadrunner said:
Benotti69 said:
Mo is cleans i tell ya!! Never tested positive!
I'm not saying he's clean or not. I don't know. My point: this information is not credible.

And 4 failed and covered doping tests is too much. Why not 14 or 40? Probably even Lance Armstrong had less. :)

Maybe he dopes a lot? This information is just as "credible" as anything that comes out of the british media regarding Farah.