- Dec 30, 2010
- 391
- 0
- 0
How high up does it go
Well reading all the new posts from what has just happened in cycling in general , leads me to think , there is a grave inconsistancy to all the punishments that have been dished out .
There is a thought that keeps comming back to mind, the silence through all of this might have to do with other people being implicated that are more powerful than Ulle, and the monetary losses from revenues that could fall apart when that house of cards comes tumbling down . So possible, the extra suspension to keep Ulle from riding is extra punishment for him as all the test authorities and media and sports organizations and what not ( wada and uci etc) , that need to tie it all together cant do so . Ulle wont give them what they want to hear.
The idea might be a far fetched one , but maybe not. There is more to this story than we are led to believe. I think if the USDA goes after pharmastrong and finds nothing just like he was cleared of any fraud so far then Ulle can speak , but it will be pointless .
AS long as the foundation funds keep rolling in funds and people keep donating all is good.
Its probably best if everyone just lets sleeping dogs lay.
AngusW said:Interesting week in the pursuit of justice...
Contador is caught in July 2010 and loses the Tour and all subsequent results but his 2 year ban starts in August 2010 - shouldn't the ban start from the day of the positive test? Maybe I'm just being picky but I'd like to know the reason for the apparent discrepancy.
Ullrich loses all results from May 2005 - June 2006 (not to mention not being unable to start the Tour in July 2006). He is effectively banned for that period. However, he then gets an official ban of two years, starting in August 2011. The evidence presented to CAS must have showed clearly that Ullrich started his doping (for this case) in May 2005, hence annulling his results from that time onwards. Okay, but given he's been retired since 2007, why the additional ban? Why not just ban him for life and give the UCI what they want? Is CAS making an example of him because his lawyers managed to use the rules to delay the case for 4+ years?
And Armstrong - well, the less said about that the better...at least his fans will feel vindicated. Good for them!
BTW: I'd really love it if Ullrich made a full confession. Hearing the truth from a pro cyclist would be a refreshing change.
Well reading all the new posts from what has just happened in cycling in general , leads me to think , there is a grave inconsistancy to all the punishments that have been dished out .
There is a thought that keeps comming back to mind, the silence through all of this might have to do with other people being implicated that are more powerful than Ulle, and the monetary losses from revenues that could fall apart when that house of cards comes tumbling down . So possible, the extra suspension to keep Ulle from riding is extra punishment for him as all the test authorities and media and sports organizations and what not ( wada and uci etc) , that need to tie it all together cant do so . Ulle wont give them what they want to hear.
The idea might be a far fetched one , but maybe not. There is more to this story than we are led to believe. I think if the USDA goes after pharmastrong and finds nothing just like he was cleared of any fraud so far then Ulle can speak , but it will be pointless .
AS long as the foundation funds keep rolling in funds and people keep donating all is good.
Its probably best if everyone just lets sleeping dogs lay.