Joe Papp Doping Timeline

Page 4 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sep 25, 2009
7,527
1
0
you are a very confused individual, E

the mods here said all you need to know...multiple sock puppets, multiple bans, multiple warnings regarding insults of other members, offtopic, baiting flaming.

'you are on a short leash'

face

pipe:D
 
python said:
I’m totally sincere and respectful of what you, susan, bala, barus and the other mods do here. I mean it.
Thanks. If you changed your preferences to allow PMs, we would have responded to some of your other comments elsewhere.

As to staying on topic, I think some of you may have missed this, so I'll quote myself:

Alpe d'Huez said:
...After reading much of this thread, I'm not really in the mood to be pushed, so if someone really is in the mindset to get banned, go ahead and post a bunch of insults or trollilng nonsense today. Just in case no one is sure what that means, rules and guidelines can be found here.
 
Sep 25, 2009
7,527
1
0
Alpe d'Huez said:
Thanks. If you changed your preferences to allow PMs, we would have responded to some of your other comments elsewhere.
i will alpe.and thanks for reminding. i thought my forum options allowed messages from mods and friends but i will check it. I took this line of restricted pms because I was sick of bpc bombarding me with nonsense.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Well, I can still post. Good to see Joe come in and be open about all of this. I will let cease posting as he is far better at dealing with this than am I.
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
Je ne sais quoi said:
What was the result of the sentencing hearing scheduled for June 25?
Cheers

Well hopefully the OP "FrankDrack" will enlighten us after he sends an email to Papp.
 
Jun 20, 2010
181
0
0
why is the OP trying to "smear" Papp.... Of course he's stepping up to do the right thing and own up for being wrong.
 
With all due respect, I must say the defensiveness displayed by some people in this thread doesn't do Papp any favours. It'd have been better to just link to that old thread and let everybody draw their own conclusions.
 
Jul 2, 2009
2,392
0
0
What does this thread have to do with Lance Armstrong? This is the Clinic - The search for truth about doping. If there is no connection to Armstrong then there is no doping. Just look at the posts on here - all doping is connected to Armstrong. Either link Papp to Armstrong or go away troll.
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
Kodiak said:
why is the OP trying to "smear" Papp.... Of course he's stepping up to do the right thing and own up for being wrong.

Because the guy who works for PS opening Lemond threads is off today.
 
Apr 28, 2009
493
0
0
hrotha said:
With all due respect, I must say the defensiveness displayed by some people in this thread doesn't do Papp any favours. It'd have been better to just link to that old thread and let everybody draw their own conclusions.

I have to agree with this one. It was an obvious bait which worked.
 
Nov 17, 2009
2,388
0
0
I found the response to this thread interesting.

Perhaps there was some desire to bring up the past of someone else... but it's happened before in the clinic. I'm not sure why that's seen as some sort of taboo subject.

We have thread on Indurain doping in the early 90's, Levi Doping 10+ years ago, Lance's actions against Simeoni in year's past, Frankie Andreu's statements about Lance and many other doping incidents from years gone by.

I know Papp posts here... but he was a professional cyclist, and his actions ARE part of the history of doping in cycling. I don't see why discussing his actions is somehow taboo. It would seem to be the same as rehashing old doping rumors or news about any other professional cyclist.
 
Aug 5, 2010
28
0
0
Dr. Maserati said:
Well hopefully the OP "FrankDrack" will enlighten us after he sends an email to Papp.

I heard back from Joe. His sentencing has been delayed and it doesn’t sound like he has a firm date at this point.

I wish him the best.
 
Jul 23, 2009
2,891
1
0
Before I invest any more time reading this, is FrankDrack BPC? The way he writes and the linguistic style is very similar.
 
Apr 28, 2009
493
0
0
pedaling squares said:
Before I invest any more time reading this, is FrankDrack BPC? The way he writes and the linguistic style is very similar.

If It Looks Like a Duck, Walks Like a Duck, and Quacks Like a Duck…
 
Aug 5, 2010
28
0
0
pedaling squares said:
Before I invest any more time reading this, is FrankDrack BPC? The way he writes and the linguistic style is very similar.

Nope, just a guy that had an interest in understanding something that didn't make sense.
 
Jan 19, 2010
214
0
0
Mambo95 said:
What does this thread have to do with Lance Armstrong? This is the Clinic - The search for truth about doping. If there is no connection to Armstrong then there is no doping. Just look at the posts on here - all doping is connected to Armstrong. Either link Papp to Armstrong or go away troll.

In cycling, Lance is Kevin Bacon...


So, Joe Papp testified against Floyd Landis, who claims he watched Lance dope.

See, didn't even need 6 degrees :p

Just having fun here, but I suspect I am now going to be attacked :mad:
 
Jan 19, 2010
214
0
0
FrankDrack said:
Nope, just a guy that had an interest in understanding something that didn't make sense.

Welcome to the club of the accused. I once posted something that ran counter to the group who is questioning your motives.

Guess how long it took to be called BPC? About one comment.

Funny thing is, I have no idea who BPC is, do you?
 
Jul 6, 2009
795
0
0
JRTinMA said:
I'm reasonable and that's not welcome on this forum but I like it here. I understand well what LA did so he's no hero of mine but I don't see him as that much more evil than any other doped rider. They all suck equal to me. I like to point out when jealousy, no righteousness drives the discussion. It can get tiring...

more like exhausting you cannot have any opinion differing from the super la haters or you are a troll or fanboy its like dealing with children. im no fanboy of anyone but myself i dont put other men up on pedastals never have never will. i do not like la's attitude at all hes a ****er but some of the blind hatred for la and the love for that douche landis is ridiculous though its like la ****ed there wives or something. i see it as bitterness and also a way of compensating for there weaknesses its easy to say ones success was purely do to drugs than accept someone is better than you. i think there are a lot of ex racer burnouts on here who think they could have done well if only they had doped makes it easier to deal with there shortcomings. some prefer delusion over reality sadly.
 
forty four said:
more like exhausting you cannot have any opinion differing from the super la haters or you are a troll or fanboy its like dealing with children. im no fanboy of anyone but myself i dont put other men up on pedastals never have never will. i do not like la's attitude at all hes a ****er but some of the blind hatred for la and the love for that douche landis is ridiculous though its like la ****ed there wives or something. i see it as bitterness and also a way of compensating for there weaknesses its easy to say ones success was purely do to drugs than accept someone is better than you. i think there are a lot of ex racer burnouts on here who think they could have done well if only they had doped makes it easier to deal with there shortcomings. some prefer delusion over reality sadly.

Amen to that..
 
forty four said:
more like exhausting you cannot have any opinion differing from the super la haters or you are a troll or fanboy its like dealing with children. im no fanboy of anyone but myself i dont put other men up on pedastals never have never will. i do not like la's attitude at all hes a ****er but some of the blind hatred for la and the love for that douche landis is ridiculous though its like la ****ed there wives or something. i see it as bitterness and also a way of compensating for there weaknesses its easy to say ones success was purely do to drugs than accept someone is better than you. i think there are a lot of ex racer burnouts on here who think they could have done well if only they had doped makes it easier to deal with there shortcomings. some prefer delusion over reality sadly.

Anyone can have an opinion. But if your opinion is based on BS and exudes a complete lack of basic understanding of the facts, don't expect to receive any respect. Most of the Lance fans here haven't heard of Ashended on read anything of substance on the doping issue. So, when you come on here and continue to spout the "most tested rider", "never tested positive", you just sound really stupid. Why are you surprised when people point that out?

Maybe you should make the effort to educate yourself.
 
Jul 6, 2009
795
0
0
Moose McKnuckles said:
Anyone can have an opinion. But if your opinion is based on BS and exudes a complete lack of basic understanding of the facts, don't expect to receive any respect. Most of the Lance fans here haven't heard of Ashended on read anything of substance on the doping issue. So, when you come on here and continue to spout the "most tested rider", "never tested positive", you just sound really stupid. Why are you surprised when people point that out?

Maybe you should make the effort to educate yourself.

i have never stated anything that would remotely suggest i think la is clean and yes blind fanboys are *** but so are people on the polar opposite of the spectrum who think la is the anti christ he is after all just an athlete. i am educated and know the same things all of us know on the subject of la and his past. i just dont get why he is any worse than anyone else.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.