- Aug 13, 2009
- 12,855
- 1
- 0
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
laziali said:Sorry, have been away from the clinic for a while - served by?
Scott SoCal said:Okay...
Just back from a huge bar tab at the Back Abbey... And I am LMFAO!!!
What does this clause mean - "unless the arbitration panel subpoenas them to testify"MacRoadie said:Ok, I'm a bit curious:
If the federal case against Armstrong was dropped, what is the liklihood that a federal case would survive against Johann?
If not the feds, then who would have served him? USADA doesn't have powers of subpoena...
MacRoadie said:Ok, I'm a bit curious:
If the federal case against Armstrong was dropped, what is the liklihood that a federal case would survive against Johann?
If not the feds, then who would have served him? USADA doesn't have powers of subpoena...
MarkvW said:If it was a criminal case, Johan wouldn't have been served. In such a situation, the feds would have put the grabbus on him.
MacRoadie said:Yeah, I understand that. That's the odd part.
Criminal case against Johann = stainless steel bracelets.
Criminal case against someone else = subpoena, but none exists (yet)
Ongoing grand jury investigation = subpoena (but the GJ was dismissed)
Civil case = subpoena, but what case and who did he talk to?
USADA case = no subpoena (no subpoena power at USADA)
MacRoadie said:Yeah, I understand that. That's the odd part.
Criminal case against Johann = stainless steel bracelets.
Criminal case against someone else = subpoena, but none exists (yet)
Ongoing grand jury investigation = subpoena (but the GJ was dismissed)
Civil case = subpoena, but what case and who did he talk to?
USADA case = no subpoena (no subpoena power at USADA)
Race Radio said:As soon as he stepped of the plane The Hog was served
Can't say I didn't tell you....
MarkvW said:Could be anything. No idea whether or not it's a subpoena or whether it is civil process. Child support? Contract breach? The qui tam?
ChrisE said:It has to be the ongoing FL investigation, right?