Something I've been wondering:
If Jumbo had actually made the decision before the race that Vingegaard would be the primary leader, with the whole "Two leaders" thing being a bluff - as speculated in the Roglic thread - does that mean that Roglic's comment during the team presentation in Tivoli about how it would be Vingegaard who'd take the final decision was actually true? At the time it just seemed like he was saying it to make the crowd happy.
A Dutch journalist that followed Vingegaard this year and did an in-depth interview with him said that Roglic even
last year was saying to everyone that wanted to hear it that Vingegaard was gonna win the Tour, which actually kind of embarrassed Vingegaard at the time according to her. It wasn't specified wether Roglic meant this year or in the future though. She also mentioned Vingegaard considers Roglic his best friend in the team and that he always has been like a mentor to him.
If all that is true, I think the team putting him as primary leader from the get-go with Primoz in on it could very well be true. It's a big if though, admittedly.
Anyway, it would never be Vingegaard himself who would make that decision. It'd always be team management of course. I think Roglic was using it metaphorically meaning "Vingegaards legs will decide".
Now I know all of the above sounds sugarsweet so I'm also gonna say this: I'm still not sure what I've witnessed the past two days. Was it attractive? Hell yeah. Do I trust the main players and their doms to have played it fair? I've been watching this sport for faaar too long to simply answer that question with a 'yes'.
Time will tell I guess. But what else is new? It's cycling after all.