Jonathan Tiernan-Locke written to by UCI, asked to explain blood values

Page 90 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
gillan1969 said:
merckx index doesn't need me to defend him but the points he raises are irrespective of the details of the report...his point is broader

and re the the target...you guys (avoriaz and fmk_rol) obviously don't race, or if you do you must get off on beating up on sportive riders ;-)

Generally a scientific report would validate its 10-14 days claim with some reasoning. But there is none. It's just stated as fact with no reason as to why. In these types of hearings you don't get cross examination, you only can prove your side.

Because it was a blood draw measuring data points on specific parameters in the blood and not the presence of a foreign substances, I don't know how they can determine this timeframe. It's like they wanted the usage date to be the ToB and not the Worlds.

Most odd.
 
Aug 12, 2009
2,814
110
11,680
thehog said:
Generally a scientific report would validate its 10-14 days claim with some reasoning. But there is none. It's just stated as fact with no reason as to why. In these types of hearings you don't get cross examination, you only can prove your side.

Because it was a blood draw measuring data points on specific parameters in the blood and not the presence of a foreign substances in the blood I don't know how they can determine this timeframe. It's like they wanted the usage date to be the ToB and not the Worlds.

Most odd.

well its cleaner...in effect distance a sports governing body from any culpability...move on, nothing to see here.....hang 'em high
 
Mar 7, 2009
790
147
10,180
gillan1969 said:
and re the the target...you guys (avoriaz and fmk_rol) obviously don't race, or if you do you must get off on beating up on sportive riders ;-)

Home tour, local knowledge, weaker field, performed well before vs one day shoot out, no knowledge of course, best riders in world, never raced the distance.

I'd take my pragmatic approach to achieving success
 
Aug 24, 2011
4,349
0
13,480
timmers said:
Well it is has been claimed that it is easy and cheap. So how much will a course of EPO cost me and who do I ask on how to take it?


3000 IU for 25 quid seems about par.
I'd have to check back with Millar's book about his doses and timing, or trawl round body building forums for their ideas, unless someone wants to chime in, to get an idea of how much a full cycle costs.

Information is 'out there' for sure. May not be the best or most current programs, but its out there.

Given the cost of good quality bikes, wheels etc. However, I'd say that falls under cheap.

Cannot guarantee the quality, which is where an inside contact/help would be useful ie. THIS stuff is good, THAT stuff is a cheap knock off and a waste of money.
 
Aug 12, 2009
2,814
110
11,680
Avoriaz said:
Home tour, local knowledge, weaker field, performed well before vs one day shoot out, no knowledge of course, best riders in world, never raced the distance.

I'd take my pragmatic approach to achieving success

yup...beating up sportive riders, do you go hunting as well? ;-)
 
Sep 16, 2010
7,617
1,053
20,680
gillan1969 said:
you guys (avoriaz and fmk_rol) obviously don't race, or if you do you must get off on beating up on sportive riders ;-)

And mugging old ladies, you forgot to accuse me of that too.

Commenting on a report - asking questions that are answered in a report - without having taken the time to read that report really does suggest that the person speaking isn't to be taken seriously.
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
fmk_RoI said:
Well with JTL it appears to have been the ToB as it was after that win that Sky actually committed to signing him. If they'd wanted his World's performance to be the deal-maker they would have held the contract over another week.

So JTL stopped doping immediately after the contract was signed, thats the spin here?
 
Mar 7, 2009
790
147
10,180
gillan1969 said:
yup...beating up sportive riders, do you go hunting as well? ;-)

Did I kick your kitten or something?

I gave you reasons why JTL would target the ToB over the WC. You just want a fight
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
the sceptic said:
So JTL stopped doping immediately after the contract was signed, thats the spin here?

Yeah, it's an odd one.

I do like the "didn't intend to dope" for the Worlds :eek:

That's just scary. Bots gone mad! :)
 
Aug 12, 2009
2,814
110
11,680
Avoriaz said:
Did I kick your kitten or something?

I gave you reasons why JTL would target the ToB over the WC. You just want a fight

no...I am suggesting that the mentality of a racer is to race against the best riders you can, to test yourself...by definition a race you know you can win is less of challenge than a race you know you probably won't. If JTL never races again i would imagine that the finale of the worlds will live longer in the memory than a stage finish in Slough (or somesuchlike)
 
Aug 12, 2009
2,814
110
11,680
fmk_RoI said:
And mugging old ladies, you forgot to accuse me of that too.

Commenting on a report - asking questions that are answered in a report - without having taken the time to read that report really does suggest that the person speaking isn't to be taken seriously.

...and you've not really understood the post...the point's raised are not answered in the report...the report infers a possible, more plausible, course of action which might have led to the blood values...as merckx rightly points out...it is but one of many potential scenarios

I see a man with a ferrari...he tells me he didn't steal it...that still leaves a large number of possibilities as to how he obtained it...I don't need to read a report to come to that conclusion...it's called common sense
 
Sep 16, 2010
7,617
1,053
20,680
the sceptic said:
So JTL stopped doping immediately after the contract was signed, thats the spin here?

Immediately after the contract he went on a bender.

Did he stop doping à la everyone else in 2006? That's not suggested. Did he dope specifically for the Worlds? UKAD don't say, they say the test taken before the Worlds indicates doping for the ToB, not based on the sample given the day before the race.
 
Sep 16, 2010
7,617
1,053
20,680
gillan1969 said:
...and you've not really understood the post...the point's raised are not answered in the report...the report infers a possible, more plausible, course of action which might have led to the blood values...as merckx rightly points out...it is but one of many potential scenarios

Actually, the fundamental question is. Read the question, read the report and you'll see.
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
fmk_RoI said:
Immediately after the contract he went on a bender.

Did he stop doping à la everyone else in 2006? That's not suggested. Did he dope specifically for the Worlds? UKAD don't say, they say the test taken before the Worlds indicates doping for the ToB, not based on the sample given the day before the race.

Like saying "Armstrong stopped doping after the 2nd rest day therefore was clean for the final time trial a few days later".

:rolleyes:
 
Sep 16, 2010
7,617
1,053
20,680
How did JTL's 2012 Worlds fit within Project Rainbow? Here's what Rod Elligworth had to say in his book:

"Great Britain went back to the 2012 world road championship in Valkenburg, Holland, with a defending champion, Mark Cavendish, and a Tour de France winner, Bradley Wiggins. It wasn't a course suited for Cav, with a steep hill to the finish, and Brad wasn't in the form he had enjoyed from March to August that year. So we went with the same mindset as a Mendrisio in 2009, at the start of the Worlds project: have a goal, and build the team behind that. Jonathan Tiernan-Locke was a good little climber and would have an outside chance, although he had never raced the distance before, and the lads got him in the perfect position in the final lap. Jon didn't quite have the legs, but you couldn't help but be encouraged to see young riders like him, Luke Rowe and Ian Stannard racing with no obvious nerves in the final laps."
 
Sep 16, 2010
7,617
1,053
20,680
thehog said:
Like saying "Armstrong stopped doping after the 2nd rest day therefore was clean for the final time trial a few days later".

I'll refer you back to an earlier comment, which you chose not to reply to (but have at least amended your argument):

Originally Posted by thehog
Correct, just as they annulled the result for the Worlds because he was administered drugs to enhance his performance.

On a point of pedantry, he was stripped of the Worlds placing as it came after the fatal test. He was stripped of the ToB victory because, in the opinion of UKAD, the post ToB ABP test suggested he'd doped prior to the ToB.

So UKAD said he doped for the ToB, but they didn't say he doped for the Worlds.

Yes, you can argue he was still gaining an advantage at the Worlds from the pre-ToB doping, but it is inaccurate to suggest he was stripped of the Worlds place because he had doped specifically for it. And that is the inference you have repeatedly made, whether intentionally or not.
 
Aug 12, 2009
2,814
110
11,680
fmk_RoI said:
I'll refer you back to an earlier comment, which you chose not to reply to (but have at least amended your argument):

i do 500 miles in the last week of february...it is not for a race the first week in march...it is to prepare for the races in April

.......for example.

The report makes a conjecture as to WHEN he doped...it is your inference as to WHAT he doped for
 
Aug 12, 2009
2,814
110
11,680
fmk_RoI said:
How did JTL's 2012 Worlds fit within Project Rainbow? Here's what Rod Elligworth had to say in his book:

well...he'll need to start ripping pages out of his own book now :)
 
Aug 12, 2009
2,814
110
11,680
fmk_RoI said:
That is wrong.

paragraph 48....I'm not sure which bit of it you don't understand...and even it states that they are not even taking it (the timeframe for potentially taking and stopping the epo) into account in reaching their verdict

are you reading the same report as me?
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
gillan1969 said:
paragraph 48....I'm not sure which bit of it you don't understand...and even it states that they are not even taking it (the timeframe for potentially taking and stopping the epo) into account in reaching their verdict

are you reading the same report as me?

This effort to distance sky from JTL seems rather silly considering sky had full access and knew everything about him long before the contract was signed.
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
fmk_RoI said:
I'll refer you back to an earlier comment, which you chose not to reply to (but have at least amended your argument):

Correction. They didn't say he doped "for" the ToB they made an estimation of when the possible drug was first administered.

They couldn't possibly make a conclusion on what the intent was unless they were able to read JTL's mind and Brailsford's.

10-14 days is an estimate with no explanation. Everyone including JTL is unsure how this estimate is derived*.




* unless of course there was supplementary documentation shared between the parties which is not included as part of the RD.
 
Aug 12, 2009
2,814
110
11,680
works night out last night...about 20 units...

so far...1.5 litres of tropicana...500ml coffee and 6 large glasses of water....

......but then......I am planning on doing a 70mile easy pedal on Sunday ;)