You can't deny that Drive to Survive has worked wonders for F1's popularity. They tried something similar with the Netflix series on the Tour de France, but they failed spectacularly. Of course these series create their own narratives, but apparently there's something about F1 that appeals to the masses which cycling doesn't have. I don't know what it is, although purely on the basis on these two series, I have to say that Drive to Survive is just better tv
Being both a motorsportsfan and a cycling fan for +40 years I would say today's pro road cycling is way more competitive speaking core excitement just watching the action itself than ever before.
So watchable that a Netflix series couldn't have done better.
While F1 is a completely different story.
Now very little legal room for pioneering designs, all cars looking identical, loads of nanny electronic aids, not leaving much behind the wheel between man and machine, perfect race circuit surfaces and boundaries, acres of run-off areas, forgiving curbs, scrutineered-for-years optimized aerodynamics meaning race cars glued to road surface and one and same 'perfect' spoiling wake raigh making it impossible for proper overtakes and at some point decisions about the need of DRS zones in order to spice things artificially up and now the past decade with an awakened sense of justice combined with confused stewards and officials so the tension is greatest in post race legal decisions.
I'm so sick of it, that I'd prefer about 33-37 other motorsport series before I'll go watching a full F1 GP weekend 1:1 again and just glad that I witnessed F1 from late 1970ies to start 90ies packed with Grand Prix events where the handful were left to the pilots behind the wheels on non-optimal tracks with plenty of consequence, in addition to the far more unexpected nature of fragile race car engines, oil leaks, mechanics etc. and naturally mostly no-nonsense decisions, best part before pit radio introduction, leaving even more up to the driver on own hand speaking immediate decisions under changing race conditions and nursing the fragile beauties.
*edit* this goes fully as well when filtering out all the unfortunate dark outcomes, of which ofcourse were a way larger part of racing by the time (thought I had to state this clearly knowing a huge hord being eager for disqualifying the good times with reason of lack of safety).
So, speaking present state of F1 a Netflix sensitive melodrama makes fully sense for attracting newcomers.
Whereas today's pro road cycling is selling itself.
For instance my niece. Never understood the idea of watching cycling, until she one day last year watched a oneday race (don't remember which one, a semi-classic I think) and she was hooked. IMO so much more exciting than when I started watcing with a very fixed hierarchy of Un Patron and rest of riders were not much more than water carriers (*edit2* OK I really liked and severely miss the time before DS radio contact, often delivering races where the cunning cheated the less cunning, but apart from that).
Besides today we are gifted with Patrons like Pogi and Remco delivering the full monty show unfiltered.
The only aber-dabai being where today's cycling commentators make the races boring and uninteresting by yelling too much and puncturing the balloon in soulless analysis, where the story is right before their eyes to be told in the right way, so only reason for a Netflix narrator having to repair on that part IMO.