sniper said:
Be my guest. If you can, show me how guys like Leinders, Ferrari, Lefevre or Riis are putting themselves on anti-doping high horses as much as Vaughters/Braislford.
Well unlike others, the reason I give JV credence is that from the start of Slipstream in 2008 he was clear about dopers on his team. He never set out with this mantra of "we will have no contact with dopers" which many have tried to associate him with since.
When the team was launched in Boulder, Vaughters said there would be riders on the team who had doped in the past but there would be no doping whilst at his team. Period. As far as he was concerned, the past was the past and everyone started with a clean sheet with him. He never hid this and was quite open about it, was reported in articles so hardly secretive.
Now people might not agree with that and some of the riders who lost places on the team were not happy about it but he never tried to BS about it.
Digger trades on second hand rumours and info and presents them as facts. Anybody can do that, for example I have talked with a few people who have been friends with Garmin/ex-Garmin riders. According to them JV is the real deal when it comes to the no doping stuff and has been firm on that stance.
Through the same sources I have heard that JV can also be a real ****, petty and not the greatest people person ever. This has been played out in several public incidents e.g Lowe, Hushovd, Pate that are mostly known about. JV has admitted this of course but just because most people don't hear about it, they don't even know.
JV did an interview with Mike Creed way back where they talked about how Creed hated him after he was fired by Slipstream. Creed felt he was mistreated by JV. They talked about how JV had treated a few riders badly, Lucas Eusar being another and JV put his hands up and admitted that he wasn't perfect but that was part of management, being a **** at times. Of course a rider who is fired is never going to be happy.
However, none of this means he is not genuine in his anti-doping stance.
Too often here people twist what JV says to suit their own agenda, the most common being JV saying things have improved being turned into JV saying there is no longer doping, and then everytime someone test's positive or does a unbelievable ride, trying to jam it to JV as Oh, I thought things were clean. Well, uh he never said that and riders testing positive still don't negate the idea that things might have improved.
Garmin have 50 staff plus so the fact that they don't all share the same opinion on something is hardly surprising. I can understand why some might have been ****ed at Floyd, nobody want's to see their sordid past being dragged into public even if they have moved on.
If we are trying to judge Garmin's cleanliness on whether a few riders were not supportive of Landis, the we are moving to a whole new level of craziness. Yes, lets start banning people based on their personal opinions.