BroDeal said:
JV has become the UCI's Uncle Tom. He is the guy who gets trotted out to present the official party line that the the sport has changed, that the culture is completely different than a few years ago.. In the past it was mumble...mumble...cough...mumble...cough, but now it is so much better. If the sport really has changed then JV would not be tiptoeing around, afraid of his own shadow ,like Einstein during a zombie outbreak.
Or he is saying, not that the culture is completely different (what you make of his words), but the that the direction has changed (his actual words).
Which turns
"If the sport really has changed then JV would not be tiptoeing around,"
quite likely into
"The reason why JV is still tiptoeing around could well be because he judges that the sport hasn't changed enough yet, to put things at risk, that simply aren't worth the price for him, or that he feels he cannot force others to pay that he is responsible for too."
That type of secrecy and deception is no different than the corruption that we get from McQuaid.
I think we know who would not qualify for the position of judge, if that's your honest opinion. There is a sliding scale from letting a colleague get away with a sick note, to writing one, to helming an organisation that industrializes and institutionalizes fraudulent sick notes, whilst taking underhand bribes to game the system that you helped set up yourself.
Yes, it is all bad. No, it is not all the same type.
He says he wants a cleaner sports and seems to claim that he is working to the best of his ability to make it happen.
You don't have to like him, you don't have to embrace him, you don't have to believe him.
But he also doesn't have to believe that what you say is true, that if he did what you proclaim, it would be so much better. In the end, you speculate. So does he.
He has also no obligation to fight your fight your way at his cost (and that of those around him), and not yours.
He picks his path, he will have to swallow his own consequences. I have learned one thing in life: if you are gonna make mistakes, you better make sure they are your own.
What JV offers us is a slippery slope of selective prosecution that will inevitably lead to corruption.
Possibly.
Self policing done in secret will never work for long.
There are plenty of exceptional characters around who give that a good run for their money though. Not for one moment claiming that JV is one of those.
I know he has opened his mouth in public about his doping stance, so he can be addressed on it in public. I however see no reason why a person who might well sincerely think this is not only the best way forward for him, but also for the sport as a whole,
at this point in time, is "no different" from someone who you see as utterly corrupt, Pat McQaid.
It is a great argument you made, but it did start by overstating the claims that JV is actually making about the state of the sport right now. Building on the wrong foundation can lead to wonky houses.