- Aug 12, 2009
- 3,639
- 0
- 0
blackcat said:no.
my response was to the "natural talent" appellation.
thought we were all in agreement, this is virtually impossible to discern.
Ok fair enough. Got confused with your rhetoric again.
'Natural talent' is just a label. A buzz term. Something to identify and categorize. Is it right to do so? Depends doesn't it. Perhaps I should have said I have more faith in him being clean simply by his performances on the road given his genetic pedigree. Given his genetics I don't think it is strange he is a pro rider. He fits the scope of someone who could make it IF he had the correct guidance. That doesn't mean he is a world beater, but IMO someone who I think naturally would be a pro and someone to make some waves based on that genetic probability of having the right combo to do well. Note he isn't a worlds best. But he is good. I think better than his cousin. But that is just my opinion.
Should we label people? Probably not, but it's part of human conditioning and behaviour. It's gonna happen. As long as the target audience can fathom it's intent and the scope, then it's a necessary barrier to discussion. It's about perception filters and the direct language used to associate people with a separate idea or ideal. Aka, are you clean or dirty? Is your talent augmented or were you born with it and are only using it untainted?
Parrot23 or whoever raised the issue about Martin...he's not high on the dirty looking riders agenda. A lot of luck was behind his win and the leaders jersey. I also must add, look at Uran this week. Had to do all the chasing on the last climb, cracked with 4km or whatever to go, finished 6 minutes back. Wiggins ain't where he was last year. Garmin had two guys on his wheel according to the stage report and he is well below Valverde, Quintana, Purito, Gesink and Van den Broecke. This Giro might be interesting.