RHRH19861986 said:I think this case Kimmage ./. UCI will lead to nothing, he can´t be successful, UCI are not stupid, they likely have done everything in the past to make sure there is no evidence for anything. In court, evidence is what is needed, and Kimmage doesn´t have more than speculation, hearsays and so on.
OK, it rises pressure on "McVerbruggen", but if they stand together, and UCI commitees do so, Kimmage won´t influence UCI internal things.
It is not hearsay if witnesses are stepping forward to detail information they have passed on to the UCI about doping that was ignored.
UCI are not a wealthy organization as pleaded in the past by Pat (in welcoming Armstrong's "donations").
UCI have been established as a not for profit operation with the substantial shortfall in receipts being funded by national federations. The UCI Congress will not be happy campers to find they may be requested to lift their contributions to attempt to legally protect Hein & Pat's exposed misconduct.
Interesting move by Kimmage. Don't know about Swiss law but in other jurisdictions of the world criminal prosecutions are commenced by "law enforcers". The State wears the cost of the investigations and prosecution.
This action may be a preamble and igniter for the Swiss authorities to take over proceedings.
I expect UCI will be rushing to get Kimmage et al into mediation to settle.