- Jul 25, 2009
- 1,072
- 0
- 0
purcell said:Have I missed a link somewhere, are the filings available somewhere for download???
This press release is all Ive seen
Page 1 pic.twitter.com/SA5Kq3l9
Page 2 pic.twitter.com/sWD6mKtb
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
purcell said:Have I missed a link somewhere, are the filings available somewhere for download???
Velodude said:Did GL ever bring doping examples of other riders to the attention of UCI for their action?
I would believe the listing of former riders who have either joined or are assisting PK in this endeavor fall into this category.
ToreBear said:Perhaps the thread title should be changed?
Kimmage is not suing. He is as far as I understand presenting the police with a tonne of evidence and filing a criminal complaint.
The police will then need to evaluate the evidence, then investigate, then prosecute.
So in effect Kimmage's lawyer is calling the cops on the Pat and Hein.
So the question is how long it takes before the police raids their respective houses and offices to gather evidence.
...snip....
BroDeal said:Hopefully news of this will cause more people to donate to the Kimmage fund.
Also hopefully this thread won't be deleted by CN management like the other Kimmage thread was.
Velodude said:CyclingNews got it wrong in claiming Kimmage was "countersuing" in defense of UCI/Verbruggen/McQuaid defamation action.
Velonation got it right by informing Kimmage "counter attacks" by laying information with authorities alleging criminal conduct.
Maxiton said:This is even better than counter-suing, IMO - a lot cheaper, for sure, and a lot more likely to turn up something (assuming the Swiss police do their jobs and aren't corrupt).
it was over 70 pages, i think. too many to recoup.Maxiton said:Was that the thread announcing that Pat and Hein were suing Kimmage? When did the deletion happen? What was the reason given?
EDIT: What was in that thread? Why don't we list in this thread all those things that were in the other thread that might have gotten it deleted. Merely as a point of fact.![]()
Maxiton said:This is even better than counter-suing, IMO - a lot cheaper, for sure, and a lot more likely to turn up something (assuming the Swiss police do their jobs and aren't corrupt).
Dr. Maserati said:Kimmage has what the UCI doesn't - which is the truth.
proffate said:are you sure about that?
trailrunner said:You sure about that?
Fortyninefourteen said:Andreu and others had the truth. Armstrong had money. We all know how that went for 15 years.
Fortyninefourteen said:I hate to be the party pooper here, but this could prove to be a mistake. UCI could instantly re-activate their suit against Kimmage here and outspend him 100 to 1. And then outspend him to defend his counter.
Paul, if you are reading this please stay centered here and do not let the euphoria of the moment guide you into a false sense of advantage. The 80 K will disappear faster than a Jamaican pickpocket, and the goodwill of the believers can only carry this so far. Let the battle be fought by the ones who can afford to. Please.
Fortyninefourteen said:I hate to be the party pooper here, but this could prove to be a mistake. UCI could instantly re-activate their suit against Kimmage here and outspend him 100 to 1. And then outspend him to defend his counter.
Paul, if you are reading this please stay centered here and do not let the euphoria of the moment guide you into a false sense of advantage. The 80 K will disappear faster than a Jamaican pickpocket, and the goodwill of the believers can only carry this so far. Let the battle be fought by the ones who can afford to. Please.
Fortyninefourteen said:I hate to be the party pooper here, but this could prove to be a mistake. UCI could instantly re-activate their suit against Kimmage here and outspend him 100 to 1. And then outspend him to defend his counter.
Paul, if you are reading this please stay centered here and do not let the euphoria of the moment guide you into a false sense of advantage. The 80 K will disappear faster than a Jamaican pickpocket, and the goodwill of the believers can only carry this so far. Let the battle be fought by the ones who can afford to. Please.
Fortyninefourteen said:I hate to be the party pooper here, but this could prove to be a mistake. UCI could instantly re-activate their suit against Kimmage here and outspend him 100 to 1.