Dr. Maserati
BANNED
- Jun 19, 2009
- 13,250
- 1
- 0
happytramp said:^^^^^^ Okay, we've clearly gone over the top now and are getting completely carried away with ourselves ........So why am I enjoying it so much![]()
thehog said:His lawyers are working Pro Bono. The 80k is being spent on flying witnesses, requesting documentation etc.
Also this is not civil trial with several appeals. Its a submission to the criminal court. Its not Kimmidge vs UCI.
Do you get it?
Fortyninefourteen said:If that is in fact the case, then Kimmage drawing the authorities attention to the 'fraud' hopefully proves to be fruitful.
Often times in lawsuits reason falls by the wayside and then it becomes a pi55ing contest where the lawyers run the files up based on the emotions of the parties.
I am all for PK, but the moral victory has been had. If he forces UCI to show up guns ablaze, it may not be so easy and for sure expensive.
BroDeal said:Hopefully news of this will cause more people to donate to the Kimmage fund.
Also hopefully this thread won't be deleted by CN mangement like the other Kimmage thread was.
Fortyninefourteen said:If that is in fact the case, then Kimmage drawing the authorities attention to the 'fraud' hopefully proves to be fruitful.
Often times in lawsuits reason falls by the wayside and then it becomes a pi55ing contest where the lawyers run the files up based on the emotions of the parties.
I am all for PK, but the moral victory has been had. If he forces UCI to show up guns ablaze, it may not be so easy and for sure expensive.
Dr. Maserati said:First Kimmage is going after HV & PMcQ personally. No UCI funds will be used (wasted) trying to defend themselves.
Effectively, this is now in the hands of the Swiss authorities to pursue.
Regardless, the UCI does not have major funds - but I would think the 2 old boys have enough stacked away (thanks Nike) but if PK needs more funds I expect he can get way more.
silverrocket said:Is this a known fact or an assumption? I'm just asking because in such cases, sometimes, the legal umbrella of the employer can be used to assist employees being sued for things that happened/were said when they were working.
(this would also assume that the UCI would want to step in to help defend Pat and Hein, which is not at all necessarily the case)
Velodude said:If an employee of an organization incurs legal costs to carry out his duties for his employer he is entitled to seek indemnification from the employer for those costs.
You can usually find this provision written into employee contracts.
Hein only holds an honorary position with the UCI. It is ceremonial and he is not an employee.
Also his appointment to the UCI Management Committee is ultra vires the UCI Constitution and is therefore invalid.
Hein would have to look to his Japanese slush fund (I originally wrote sushi) from the keiran boys to meet his costs.
Dear Wiggo said:Is Pat a UCI employee? I thought President was some other type of position?
silverrocket said:Is this a known fact or an assumption? I'm just asking because in such cases, sometimes, the legal umbrella of the employer can be used to assist employees being sued for things that happened/were said when they were working.
(this would also assume that the UCI would want to step in to help defend Pat and Hein, which is not at all necessarily the case)
Grandillusion said:Strikes me that Kimmage is no idiot, has shown incredible tenacity for a decade, and will have chosen this course in a very considered and intelligent way.
His Genevan "Maximus" I'm presuming will be equally savvy and obviously confident of a successful outcome.
Bring it on!
keeponrollin said:He can't go wrong ... Think about it.
Swiss Plod have to investigate, so they will be interviewing, lots & lots of people, & all without PK having to pay for them to go to meet Plod. At the end of the process, there are a number of possible outcomes:
- Plod decides there are grounds to Prosecute - Result !
- Plod can't substantiate the charges, but uncover other 'interesting' evidence - Result !
- Plod find nothing, but lots of people with interesting stories to tell get interviewed under oath, about things, LA, McQ & VerB had been hoping to keep quiet - Result !
- Regardless, PK gets vindicated !
Tinman said:The one thing you forget is that Plod gets paid by sports who are in Switzerland because of the money (taxes, lack of transaction transparency, etc) and because they trust that Plod will look after them when it counts. Which Plod almost always has in the past.
Dear Wiggo said:Is Pat a UCI employee? I thought President was some other type of position?
keeponrollin said:The UCI is a pimple on the ar$e of a flea attached to the Elephant that is Swiss Tax income
They are specifically in Switizerland so they don't have to pay much tax.
You are rather massively overestimating the stature of these guys.
cathulu said:For sure Lemond is quietly involved wrt the 55 exhibits. Will the 28 pages be released to the public at some point? I don't think there is anything preventing Paul from releasing it to the public unless it is against his strategy. We shall wait and see...
That's along the line that I was pondering. And could this not be extended to include Hein, as a former UCI employee who is defending himself against allegations made specifically about his conduct while working for the UCI? I suppose that is something that the UCI directors will decide.Velodude said:If an employee of an organization incurs legal costs to carry out his duties for his employer he is entitled to seek indemnification from the employer for those costs.
Velodude said:It is a Swiss prosecution matter and one would expect would not be released to the public.
Velodude said:The unexpected release by USADA of the complete reasoned decision and supporting evidence was a tactical stroke to create media opinions, statements from disgusted eminent past cyclists and forum discussion on the fragility of UCI's position to continue to support Armstrong and refer to CAS.
It worked. UCI read the public mood and folded. Now they are in lock down self preservation mode at the Swiss bunker.