- Sep 29, 2012
- 12,197
- 0
- 0
LaFlorecita said:it's not slow for me?![]()
Ah really. I have had ISP issues recently, so maybe it's that.
LaFlorecita said:it's not slow for me?![]()
TomasC said:Here are the dates of the tests
So it seems these are all his ABP tests from 2007 to 2013.
It would be handy to extract the dates from the PDF, map them with the values and with the specific races...who volunteers?![]()
PeterB said:In fact, almost all samples are referred to specific dates in the experts' papers (see Iniesta). In particular:
Sample 44 11-04-2012 No competition 15,5 1,56%
Sample 45 24-04-2012 Tour de Romandie 16,4 1,58%
Sample 46 03-05-2012 Pre-Giro 15 1,46%
Sample 47 14-05-2012 Giro 14,5 1,44%
Sample 48 20-05-2012 Giro 14,8 1,52%
Sample 49 24-05-2012 Giro 16,1 1,4%
Two last samples are from 2013 season. Data start with 2008 samples:
Sample 1 30/04/2008 Tour de Romandie 15,4 1,15%
Sample 2 03/07/2008 Pre-Tour 14,9 0,88%
Sample 3 15/07/2008 Tour de France 14,8 0,99%
Race Radio @TheRaceRadio
Kreuzinger's HCt went from 43.2 to 48.1 in 10 days DURING the Giro. Not normal
Race Radio @TheRaceRadio
Kreuzinger graphs also show a drop in HGB coupled with spike in Rect. Very good indication of a blood withdraw
Race Radio @TheRaceRadio
Kreuzinger graphs show a spike in HGB coupled with drop in Rect. Very good indication of a transfusion, especially at end of a 3 week GT
TheGame said:Giro, Hb and Retic (hb/10 to fit graph)
1 Roman Kreuziger (Cze) Astana Pro Team 6:18:03
2 Ryder Hesjedal (Can) Garmin - Barracuda 0:00:19
3 Joaquim Rodriguez Oliver (Spa) Katusha Team 0:00:32
plooton said:Finally Roman released the BP data that suggests his case is nothing else than a wilful and calculated action aiming to bring a damage. That's not only generally illogical and anti-intuitive case (as he just underperformed in the two concerned periods of racing), the date itself shows no significant values that would deviate from the norm.
http://kreuzigercase.cz/documents/
the sceptic said:So this is where Kreuziger was riding at almost 50%
TomasC said:You should probably read the previous posts.
plooton said:Yes, coz he wasn't a threat any more for all the contenders, they let him go clear, that all.
the sceptic said:and where do you think the 4% gain in hematocrit came from?
Actually it was an 11% Gain going from 43.2 to 48.1the sceptic said:and where do you think the 4% gain in hematocrit came from?
plooton said:That's not a marker that would any significantly exceed the probability and diverge outside limits of normal variation.
Snake oil salesman said:hct at giro start was high across the board
ralphbert said:Actually it was an 11% Gain going from 43.2 to 48.1
Coupled with retic Dropping in the toilet and hb surging.
Seems legit
This is where his explanation breaks down. The fact that there wasn't a positive for EPO is irrelevant, and therefore #1 can easily be explained by microdosing.PeterB said:1. % Ret was almost identical (i.e. decrease within measurement error?), while more significant drop should be observed if blood was transfused
2. No EPO positive from urine tests during Giro
