mountainrman said:I shall ignore the flame - but if you actually took the trouble to read what I write you would know that my biggest criticism of the sanctions.was over leniency to such as Hincapie - not over harsh.
I fail to understand why you all seem to support such a serial lifetime conspiring cheat, who came clean when already caught just to save his own skin, and why you and Tygart allow them the Nazi defence which has never been allowed in criminal law ie "diminished responsibility because the boss told me too and the boss is nasty". As many clean riders have pointed out, they made their own choices. They could have walked away, but chose to live a life of luxury as part of the conspiracy scam. Read Nicole Cookes retirement statement to see how that looks to a clean rider.
For all that a ratio of sentence of 20-1 for LA to GH is hopelessly out of proportion too. GH was clearly supplying drugs on occasion too. If LA manages to out the corrupt moneymen and corruption in UCI he deserves reduction to a couple if years too. I am for equity not vengeance.
As regards GH Why do you all like dopers so much? Just because they rat on their mates when cornered?
As for the one who said Hincapie was allowed to ride TdF to disguise the fact he had ratted. Totally wrong. He had already been told to withdraw from olympics. So it was not a secret. They could have and should have stopped him parading his cheating at he TdF by ordering him to withdraw from it, and failing his withdrawing quietly, they should have publicly done a Rasmussen on him, Tygart In person is responsible for allowing him, to ride,mocking clean riders in the process
Tygart makes mistakes. There is one.
As regards the interview a lot are now saying "split into two"
But In the UK we have seemingly one programme at 2am GMT lasting 1.25 repeated on thursday and friday night?
So with everything happening with all the American cyclists and the entire sport your big beef is..... George Hincapie. With regards to your 20-1 sanction ratio, that doesn't seem unfair to me. armstrong's impact on the sport was well beyond that ratio. armstrong's earnings were beyond that ratio. The magnitude of his offenses are beyond that ratio. Had armstrong cooperated instead of throwing a hissy fit, the ratio would have been unfairly shifted to his favor. That wouldn't seem right, but hey, I'm into equity not vengeance.
I don't have any idea why you're so surprised to find the lack of GH discussion in a "lance on Oprah" thread. Maybe you can go find a Sky or JV thread to talk about him in, makes as much sense.
Oh, and for the record, I agree GH and others shouldn't have been riding in the tour. Usada took charge of the case in February. Sanctions being dished out in six month is rather speedy by cycling standards.