- May 13, 2009
- 653
- 0
- 0
Moose McKnuckles said:The fact that many of us believed he was a liar when he denied doping, but we believe him now that he admits what many of us have known for years is ironic to you?
Yes thats what I just said.
Moose McKnuckles said:The fact that many of us believed he was a liar when he denied doping, but we believe him now that he admits what many of us have known for years is ironic to you?
eleven said:Evidence of...what, exactly, that would lead to a criminal investigation in the US?
frizzlefry said:Yes thats what I just said.
Boeing said:I am starting to get sick to my stomach. not from the photos but it is all coming down.
Tomorrows trip to the top for the stage is sudden apathy now and my 4 days in July watching bikes go up hill seems to be less romantic then it ever was
Go Lakers
frizzlefry said:Yes thats what I just said.
goggalor said:It's official: Lance Armstrong cries blood.
eleven said:Evidence of...what, exactly, that would lead to a criminal investigation in the US?
Franklin said:There isn't enough for criminal charges unless further evidence shows up. I could be wrong, but that's how it looks to me. Even the Verbruggen cover up isn't a case yet, though I'm sure it will be ground for investigations.
This will be enough ammo for every country to turn every cycling bus inside out, so I expect quite a few raids.
altark123 said:poll says only 14% respect Flandis more after admitting use and naming others, 86% have less. That's going to be the public opinion around the US I believe.
scribe said:Well, they got the claims of someone who just reversed his rigorous claims of the last several years. That's enough, no?
Alpe d'Huez said:I'm too starting to think this is it for his season, and maybe career. I can't see him getting to the Tour, and even if Shack is there, they'll be forced to ride completely clean as the atmosphere will be so hot. If what Floyd claims about JB and his teams is true, this spells disaster along the lines of Willy Voet's description of Festina's demise in 1998.
Sort of. And I agree with you. But you seem aware of how this works, and the feds usually don't go after someone until they have solid evidence, and that could take a while here. But when they do, they have an extremely high conviction rate. Once the ball gets rolling though, it tends to roll, as people want to save their skin, thus cooperate and plea out. LA isn't in a position to do that.Colm.Murphy said:Their sponsor was the federal govt. They will want to know what happened.
gjdavis60 said:Possession and distribution of controlled substances. Conspiracy. Racketeering. There is a laundry list of possible criminal offenses in Landis' allegations.
Cobblestones said:So calling him a liar when he lies, and not calling him one when he's telling the truth is ... ironic? I don't think you grasp the concept of irony.
frizzlefry said:How do you respect someone who exhausted all his appeals, and then told the truth?
Cobblestones said:So, LA retiring from the ToC should bring the focus squarely on DZ, LL, GH. Someone should ask them serious questions. Why not ask Levi directly about 1996 to start with?
frizzlefry said:No, calling him a liar, and then believing every word he says when it suits the agenda.