Race Radio said:Time has proven Conseco to be correct.
yes, but A-Rod is still one of the most respected and highest paid players in the game.
Race Radio said:Time has proven Conseco to be correct.
scribe said:For example, he mentioned the team made blood transfusions in front of one another, and made a point regarding only 3 of his teammates being American. I suppose one could say the letter was directed at the head of American cycling. But if he wants people to believe it is widespread, he better get out there and hang them all.
TeamSkyFans said:wada statement
“WADA is aware of the serious allegations made by Mr Landis. We are very interested in learning more about this matter and we will liaise with the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) and any other authorities with appropriate jurisdiction to get to the heart of the issues raised. WADA looks forward to these further investigations and enquiries by those responsible.
“Generally speaking, WADA encourages everyone with knowledge of banned practices in sport, including athletes who were caught cheating and who denied the evidence for years, to be forthcoming in disclosing the information they may have to the proper authorities. This will further contribute to clean sport and strengthen existing anti-doping programs for the good of clean athletes worldwide.”
scribe said:Well, if he wants to take part in cleaning cycling up, he has to put forth a case against the more relevant audience.
Digger said:I've never seen a more explosive thread. Everytime I post, there's another ten posts unread.
Michael Barry, the poster boy for clean cycling
Pat McQuaid, could he possible be more complicit? Short of injecting the riders himself...
thingswelike said:That WADA statement just shows what an utter disgrace that UCI statement was.
Look, I understand your point and it is pretty confusing but I don´t think it is completely at odds with the facts. Furthermore it explains Landis´s subsequent behaviour.eleven said:I know! That's just completely freaking absurd. "I was a doper. I doped early, often and in large doses. I used testosterone. But, well.....despite all my doping and testosterone use I was NOT using testosterone the one time I actually failed a drug test for using testosterone".
Seriously, I wish I knew exactly which statement under oath he was trying to avoid perjuring.
Could be, but I am reading the direct email as posted to this forum. Perhaps Landis lacks the sophistication necessary to actually help clean up cycling, but bits and pieces implicating his American buddies is something that colors this process.Zerak-Tul said:Well he did say they stopped the bus to dope the entire USP team (not just americans), but I think the US media sites breaking this story only named the US riders, because that's what their readers would care about.
buckwheat said:Race Radio will be holding fanboy counseling sessions. Pm him for details.
xmoonx said:Unless FL has INCONTROVERTIBLE proof NOT much is going to come of this.
LA, Bruyneel, USPostal 2004, UCI, Lelangue, Ochowicz etc. are simply going to deny it. And the reply will be a unanimous one "Landis allegations must be viewed with scepticism after he previously denied doping Landis’ sudden doping admission comes after the rider spent hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to prove his innocence, including the establishment of the Floyd Fairness Fund which encouraged people to donate to help with the estimated $500,000 legal bill."
If they all deny;his word against all these powerhouses will amount to very little.
At the very best he'll get a book deal. At the very worst he'll come across as a lost soul and or off his rocker, which is kinda sad.
red_flanders said:All this explains in a lot more resolution why Armstrong was so ****ed at Landis for leaving the team.
Basically, they trained him how to win. How to dope at the highest level. He then took this info and planned to use it against them. In the world of legal methods and training, they'd have had a no-compete clause. In the world of cheating and potentially criminal activity, it's a skinny-man-in-tights turf war.
red_flanders said:All this explains in a lot more resolution why Armstrong was so ****ed at Landis for leaving the team.
Basically, they trained him how to win. How to dope at the highest level. He then took this info and planned to use it against them. In the world of legal methods and training, they'd have had a no-compete clause. In the world of cheating and potentially criminal activity, it's a skinny-man-in-tights turf war.
