• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

  • We hope all of you have a great holiday season and an incredible New Year. Thanks so much for being part of the Cycling News community!

Le Tour 2018 stage 10: Annecy > Le Grand-Bornand 158,5 km

Page 21 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Re: Le Tour 2018 stage 10: Annecy > Le Grand-Bornand 158,5 k

If Quintana or Landa don't do anything the next couple of days they're gonners for the Tour. I can see Froome going for the win on D'huez like he won the big one in the Giro then it's game over for the rest. Think Dumo is just gonna try and stick with Froome and G to have a showdown in the ITT. Nibali, I have no idea what to think of him at the moment, but I have a feeling that he will at least try something more than Borastar!
 
Re: Le Tour 2018 stage 10: Annecy > Le Grand-Bornand 158,5 k

Simurgh said:
alspacka said:
It's incredible that enthusiasts on a cycling forum were expecting >100km GC attacks on the first mountain stage. "If only Contador were here" :lol:

Expecting? On the contrary, I expected (as I wrote in the first pages of the thread) that probably nothing will happen between the favorites. What I need is, yes, 100+ km GC attacks, or at least some testing of the SKY train, because this is boring as hell. But to expect such a scenario...do you take me and like-minded people for being fools?

The way to test the Sky Train is for a team/s to contol the peleton from kilometre zero by riding at a faster tempo - Teams allow Sky to ride the flat as if it's a sunday afternoon coffee ride and then wonder why Sky has five or six strong riders for the mountains.
 
Re:

whittashau said:
So as expected Sky’s domestiques are superior to all the other teams and superior to some of the team leaders. Bahrain-Merida had no one supporting nibbles, Movistar simply had their three leaders, lotto had their two leaders, but no one had actual support who was able to match sky’s. Could be a long tour ahead.

This is why I’m skeptical of the multi leader team’s strategy. If every rider in a team who can do anything versus the Sky domestiques is a “leader” it creates a strong risk that they all just hang on, conserving their own chances for as long as possible. Instead of a unified strategy to win, you can end up riding like two or three little teams. If there is a clear hierarchy, the second and third guys can be ordered to ride in a manner that’s suboptimal to their own chances in order to break up Sky’s control.

In order for it to work in any other way, the “leaders” need to be committed to aggressive riding. I am not optimistic that either Movistar or LottoNL are.
 
Re: Le Tour 2018 stage 10: Annecy > Le Grand-Bornand 158,5 k

yaco said:
Simurgh said:
alspacka said:
It's incredible that enthusiasts on a cycling forum were expecting >100km GC attacks on the first mountain stage. "If only Contador were here" :lol:

Expecting? On the contrary, I expected (as I wrote in the first pages of the thread) that probably nothing will happen between the favorites. What I need is, yes, 100+ km GC attacks, or at least some testing of the SKY train, because this is boring as hell. But to expect such a scenario...do you take me and like-minded people for being fools?

The way to test the Sky Train is for a team/s to contol the peleton from kilometre zero by riding at a faster tempo - Teams allow Sky to ride the flat as if it's a sunday afternoon coffee ride and then wonder why Sky has five or six strong riders for the mountains.

But if SKY are riding like its a sunday afternoon coffee ride, surely the other teams doms should still be with them (i.e. Soler)? When you look Ala who won the stage from the break and those doms that fell out the back suffering from SKYs lame pace, surely something must be wrong with those doms?

Edit: Understand why there were no attacks now due to the strong headwind, but still expected most of the doms to still be with their leaders.
 
Re: Le Tour 2018 stage 10: Annecy > Le Grand-Bornand 158,5 k

yaco said:
Simurgh said:
alspacka said:
It's incredible that enthusiasts on a cycling forum were expecting >100km GC attacks on the first mountain stage. "If only Contador were here" :lol:

Expecting? On the contrary, I expected (as I wrote in the first pages of the thread) that probably nothing will happen between the favorites. What I need is, yes, 100+ km GC attacks, or at least some testing of the SKY train, because this is boring as hell. But to expect such a scenario...do you take me and like-minded people for being fools?

The way to test the Sky Train is for a team/s to contol the peleton from kilometre zero by riding at a faster tempo - Teams allow Sky to ride the flat as if it's a sunday afternoon coffee ride and then wonder why Sky has five or six strong riders for the mountains.

No team is capable of tiring a Kwiatkowski, Moscon, Castroviejo etc by pulling them along on the flat in their slipstream, no matter how fast they go.
 
Re:

whittashau said:
So as expected Sky’s domestiques are superior to all the other teams and superior to some of the team leaders. Bahrain-Merida had no one supporting nibbles, Movistar simply had their three leaders, lotto had their two leaders, but no one had actual support who was able to match sky’s. Could be a long tour ahead.

Jumbo had Tolhoek for a long time (and Gesink up the road) they're obviously not at Sky level, but not bad for a team aiming at both GC en sprint. But with Roglic they can gamble on the TT to get them a result.
 
Re:

Dekker_Tifosi said:
Dumoulin reports a fierce headwind on the climb making attacks non sensical. He felt good but attacking didn't make sense

OR

Sky was killin' it with a massive pace ;) nonetheless it is extremely odd that NONE of the GC riders ever dared to at least "test" SKY & the magic Kenyan just once .....
 
Re: Re:

hfer07 said:
Dekker_Tifosi said:
Dumoulin reports a fierce headwind on the climb making attacks non sensical. He felt good but attacking didn't make sense

OR

Sky was killin' it with a massive pace ;) nonetheless it is extremely odd that NONE of the GC riders ever dared to at least "test" SKY & the magic Kenyan just once .....

Yates talked about a block headwind too. Makes it impossible to launch an attack that will stick.Plus it wasn't an MTF.

Let's face it, Sky have the best team, and play to their enormous strengths. Its a tactic that works. Its up to other teams to draw in the sponsorship that would permit them to buy a team with the depth of Sky. Either that or work together against Sky a little more effectively.
 
Interesting that Bernal was the only Sky dom to survive to the end of the climb. Even so though, we now know that nobody else has domestiques capable of shedding them or even sticking around with them: everyone left in the group was a leader except for Bernal and Latour.

Also I’m a bit surprised that the GC men dropped by Martin’s dig lost 50 seconds.
 
Disappointed with the stage. It offered an excellent opportunity for tactical moves but very few riders from big teams went to the breakaway so it was obvious it wouldn't work. Perhaps this stage would be better somewhere later in the race because today nobody wanted to risk while being uncertain where his climbing form stands compared to others. Headwind was a valid excuse for not attacking on the final climb but the stage offered an excellent opportunity for an ambush after Plateau des Glieres. It would require for a team to act risky and ballsy at the beginning of the stage but apparently everyone had an excuse not to.
 
I've said it many times, I'll say it again

If you're not contending for the podium after a few short seasons of turning pro, you're unlikely to ever be because you won't improve much more.
I've said it in the context of "But Tejay and Talansky are the next generation of winners", I've said it before that with Kreuziger and others, and I've been saying it since last year in the context of Jungels. As shocking as it may seem, he's not likely to get much better than this which was already his level last year
 
Re:

GuyIncognito said:
I've said it many times, I'll say it again

If you're not contending for the podium after a few short seasons of turning pro, you're unlikely to ever be because you won't improve much more.
I've said it in the context of "But Tejay and Talansky are the next generation of winners", I've said it before that with Kreuziger and others, and I've been saying it since last year in the context of Jungels. As shocking as it may seem, he's not likely to get much better than this which was already his level last year

Chris Horner would disagree with you.