AlexNYC said:GuyIncognito said:I've said it many times, I'll say it again
If you're not contending for the podium after a few short seasons of turning pro, you're unlikely to ever be because you won't improve much more.
I've said it in the context of "But Tejay and Talansky are the next generation of winners", I've said it before that with Kreuziger and others, and I've been saying it since last year in the context of Jungels. As shocking as it may seem, he's not likely to get much better than this which was already his level last year
I've heard this so many times, and it's an interesting idea, but I've always wondered if confirmation bias isn't at play here. I.e., we tend to focus on the cases where this is proven to be correct and ignore all the others where it isn't. There are too many examples that directly contradict this.
Libertine Seguros said:movingtarget - more unnecessary dogpiling on Cobo. El Bisonte was a pretty good espoir in Spain, had some prospects, built up through 26 and 27, handicapped by the Saunier Duval withdrawal of course, and even with next to no support on Fuji-Servetto managed a Vuelta top 10 in 2009. There are more factors at play with him due to both his team association history and his psychological history too, as we all know.
Dekker_Tifosi: That 2007 Giro was kind of won by Nibali's teammate though - team roles play a lot of the part, after all on paper Nairo Quintana's 36th in the 2012 is far less impressive than him being the top climber for Movistar and dragging Valverde around through week 3.
Sky_Bot: Unzué is surprisingly bothered by the team classification. Lord knows why other than place of car in cavalcade.
yaco: in fairness though, the Tour has started giving out some pretty ordinary HCs. At 6km in length I'm not sure about this one as a 'legit' HC. It's certainly no Madeleine.
I don't. But Movistar showed interest in it during other editions as well. It was a bit of joke as they were completely passive despite their much hyped "Amigos"... You know #Landismo #Landani and allBot. Sky_Bot said:Who cares about the team classification?Sestriere said:Great performance by Movistar today! They are leading the team classification now.![]()
I could be wrong, but I think it was Dumoulin. I know I falsely identified him as a Sky rider several times today.Bot. Sky_Bot said:There was 4 Sky's at the top of Colombiere. But, yes I'm not sure who was the 4th behind Froome, Bernal and Thomas.Zinoviev Letter said:Interesting that Bernal was the only Sky dom to survive to the end of the climb. Even so though, we now know that nobody else has domestiques capable of shedding them or even sticking around with them: everyone left in the group was a leader except for Bernal and Latour.
Also I’m a bit surprised that the GC men dropped by Martin’s dig lost 50 seconds.
He was one of the top U23s in Spain in 2003, and in 2004 he got injured in his very first pro race, at the Tour of Qatar, and hardly raced. In 2006 his head wasn't in it and he tried to quit the sport only for Matxín to talk him out of it. In fairness, looking back at the 2009 Fuji-Servetto lineup at the Vuelta it's a fair bit stronger than I remember it being, there's a fair few strong riders, albeit often very early in careers so they were far from polished. Still, by the end of it the only reliable hand he had was David de la Fuente, and the two of them have long since been a double act.roundabout said:Libertine Seguros said:movingtarget - more unnecessary dogpiling on Cobo. El Bisonte was a pretty good espoir in Spain, had some prospects, built up through 26 and 27, handicapped by the Saunier Duval withdrawal of course, and even with next to no support on Fuji-Servetto managed a Vuelta top 10 in 2009. There are more factors at play with him due to both his team association history and his psychological history too, as we all know.
Dekker_Tifosi: That 2007 Giro was kind of won by Nibali's teammate though - team roles play a lot of the part, after all on paper Nairo Quintana's 36th in the 2012 is far less impressive than him being the top climber for Movistar and dragging Valverde around through week 3.
Sky_Bot: Unzué is surprisingly bothered by the team classification. Lord knows why other than place of car in cavalcade.
yaco: in fairness though, the Tour has started giving out some pretty ordinary HCs. At 6km in length I'm not sure about this one as a 'legit' HC. It's certainly no Madeleine.
Cobo had next to no results in his first 3 years as a pro. Is this now called "having some prospects"?
And next to no support in the Vuelta is not supported by facts. In every difficult stage except the one he won, there was at least 1 Fuji rider within 90 seconds of Cobo at the finish.
We all know that you like Cobo for whatever reason, but maybe a more factual discussion would be in order next time?
Frihed89 said:It's been this way for most all of the post-doping era.
rlntlssly said:I could be wrong, but I think it was Dumoulin. I know I falsely identified him as a Sky rider several times today.Bot. Sky_Bot said:There was 4 Sky's at the top of Colombiere. But, yes I'm not sure who was the 4th behind Froome, Bernal and Thomas.Zinoviev Letter said:Interesting that Bernal was the only Sky dom to survive to the end of the climb. Even so though, we now know that nobody else has domestiques capable of shedding them or even sticking around with them: everyone left in the group was a leader except for Bernal and Latour.
Also I’m a bit surprised that the GC men dropped by Martin’s dig lost 50 seconds.
The post-doping era began on July 11th 2008 and ended on September 9th 2008.AnatoleNovak said:Frihed89 said:It's been this way for most all of the post-doping era.
What year would you say that this era began?
Dekker_Tifosi said:If you exclude the early breakaway men and look at the 14 names left in the favorites group I can only conclude the level is very high this year
From earth.macbindle said:LaFlorecita said:What a boring stage. Congrats Alaphilippe on a nice win
Boring? What planet are you on??
A mountain stage dominated by classics riders! It was great. Plus the scenery was spectacular
Vomistar takes all the soul from riders, that's why...Sestriere said:I don't. But Movistar showed interest in it during other editions as well. It was a bit of joke as they were completely passive despite their much hyped "Amigos"... You know #Landismo #Landani and allBot. Sky_Bot said:Who cares about the team classification?Sestriere said:Great performance by Movistar today! They are leading the team classification now.![]()
That's what you get with SkyForever The Best said:From earth.macbindle said:LaFlorecita said:What a boring stage. Congrats Alaphilippe on a nice win
Boring? What planet are you on??
A mountain stage dominated by classics riders! It was great. Plus the scenery was spectacular
A stage with 3 1C and 1 HC climbs with the great Romme-Colombiere combo with a downhill to Le Grand Bornand had 0 minutes of GC action. (I don't count Martin's attack as GC action)
OK, probably my mistake.GuyIncognito said:I'm looking at the video now. It's Dumoulin on the wheels of the 3 Skys
From front to back, the group is:
Bernal
Froome
Thomas
Dumoulin
Yates
Nibali
Quintana
Landa
Kruijswijk
Roglic
Fuglsang
Bardet
Latour
and re-watching it I just realized Valverde wasn't dropped, he was between Nibali and Quintana, then stopped pedalling and started fiddling with his chain. Mechanical?
Libertine Seguros said:The post-doping era began on July 11th 2008 and ended on September 9th 2008.AnatoleNovak said:Frihed89 said:It's been this way for most all of the post-doping era.
What year would you say that this era began?
Manuel Beltrán tested positive for EPO at the Tour. No idea why this should be the marker, though.AnatoleNovak said:Libertine Seguros said:The post-doping era began on July 11th 2008 and ended on September 9th 2008.AnatoleNovak said:Frihed89 said:It's been this way for most all of the post-doping era.
What year would you say that this era began?
September 9th: Armstrong return announced?
July 11th: no idea