Martin does not have a choice. He will attack where he can. In the third week he is usually weak and the TT is his biggest weakness. He will not care about Sky or anybody else except to improve his positionZinoviev Letter said:LargusMeans said:movingtarget said:Disaster for Movistar and Michelton. Martin and Dumoulin tried hard, Fuglsang and Zakarin looked bad. Kudos to Nieve and Caruso. More of the same tomorrow ?
Martin was a total idiot today, what did he think would happen when he went and Froome went with him. It was almost like he has a Sky shirt on.
Yes, he would have been much better off sitting in the Quintana group watching two stronger time triallists disappear further up the road. Have you ever considered offering these brain genius tactical insights to a team on a professional basis as a DS?
saneguy said:I just hope G does what Froome did to Wiggo. Payback time! But I guess Sky wont let that happen
Geraint Too Fast said:Lol. No.
Suck_Out said:Cavendish just arrived, 1 h 5 min after Thomas
Dekker_Tifosi said:I just realized, given the bonus Dumoulin had, it means Thomas was 50s faster over the climb, and Froome 30s. The other contenders were about the same time (Quintana, Roglic, Bardet)...
Damn.
If anyone ever does say that Thomas has always been obviously talented, you turn up and say how obviously hopeless he is at everything.Zinoviev Letter said:You can make a reasonable argument that Thomas was at least always obviously talented as a cyclist. You cannot make a reasonable argument that Thomas showed any signs of being a GT winner.
I can't disagree with that :Neutral:Alexandre B. said:Nairo Quintana is a disgrace of a GC rider.
Zinoviev Letter said:Geraint Too Fast said:Lol. No.
Chris Froome won his first GT as a mere child of 28 and at that point had already achieved two GT podiums. Geraint Thomas is 32, has no GT podiums, no GT top 5s, no GT top 10s. His best ever GT result, in no less than twelve starts, has been fifteenth. If Thomas wins this Tour (I don’t think he will), he will be the biggest GT nobody to win a Tour de France since WW2 and in a class of two modern GT winners with Mauri.
You can make a reasonable argument that Thomas was at least always obviously talented as a cyclist. You cannot make a reasonable argument that Thomas showed any signs of being a GT winner. Doing so is simply partisan dishonesty. Cheer for a rider you admire if you like. Lie to yourself if you like. But don’t lie to the rest of us.
Haha, that song was what came to my mind after seeing Mayo's post.GuyIncognito said:Track #4Mayomaniac said:That was a vulgar display of (Welsh) power.
rlntlssly said:If anyone ever does say that Thomas has always been obviously talented, you turn up and say how obviously hopeless he is at everything.Zinoviev Letter said:You can make a reasonable argument that Thomas was at least always obviously talented as a cyclist. You cannot make a reasonable argument that Thomas showed any signs of being a GT winner.
Zinoviev Letter said:You can make a reasonable argument that Thomas was at least always obviously talented as a cyclist. You cannot make a reasonable argument that Thomas showed any signs of being a GT winner. Doing so is simply partisan dishonesty. Cheer for a rider you admire if you like. Lie to yourself if you like. But don’t lie to the rest of us.
MuskyOurSaviour said:Zinoviev Letter said:Geraint Too Fast said:Lol. No.
Chris Froome won his first GT as a mere child of 28 and at that point had already achieved two GT podiums. Geraint Thomas is 32, has no GT podiums, no GT top 5s, no GT top 10s. His best ever GT result, in no less than twelve starts, has been fifteenth. If Thomas wins this Tour (I don’t think he will), he will be the biggest GT nobody to win a Tour de France since WW2 and in a class of two modern GT winners with Mauri.
You can make a reasonable argument that Thomas was at least always obviously talented as a cyclist. You cannot make a reasonable argument that Thomas showed any signs of being a GT winner. Doing so is simply partisan dishonesty. Cheer for a rider you admire if you like. Lie to yourself if you like. But don’t lie to the rest of us.
Ehmmmm like in 2015 he was 4th till 18th stage while being a domestique and gave up his GC to give Froome his bike.
Is that not potential to be a GT winner nowdays ??? :lol:
Zinoviev Letter said:MuskyOurSaviour said:Zinoviev Letter said:Geraint Too Fast said:Lol. No.
Chris Froome won his first GT as a mere child of 28 and at that point had already achieved two GT podiums. Geraint Thomas is 32, has no GT podiums, no GT top 5s, no GT top 10s. His best ever GT result, in no less than twelve starts, has been fifteenth. If Thomas wins this Tour (I don’t think he will), he will be the biggest GT nobody to win a Tour de France since WW2 and in a class of two modern GT winners with Mauri.
You can make a reasonable argument that Thomas was at least always obviously talented as a cyclist. You cannot make a reasonable argument that Thomas showed any signs of being a GT winner. Doing so is simply partisan dishonesty. Cheer for a rider you admire if you like. Lie to yourself if you like. But don’t lie to the rest of us.
Ehmmmm like in 2015 he was 4th till 18th stage while being a domestique and gave up his GC to give Froome his bike.
Is that not potential to be a GT winner nowdays ??? :lol:
No, finishing 15th (that’s fifteenth) in your strongest GT in finish in 12 (yes twelve) GTs by the time you are 32 (thirty bloody two) is not “potential to be a GT winner nowadays” or ever. Nobody in the modern history of the sport has ever won the Tour with such a record and only one guy has ever won a GT with such a record, a Vuelta with an infinitely weaker field). Nobody. Ever.
Oh boy, this again. The guy who closed his eyes for the whole 2015 tour the France just to open them to look at the final gc. Yeah, Thomas never showed any potential at all. This must have been the first time he has ever climbed well, right?Zinoviev Letter said:MuskyOurSaviour said:Zinoviev Letter said:Geraint Too Fast said:Lol. No.
Chris Froome won his first GT as a mere child of 28 and at that point had already achieved two GT podiums. Geraint Thomas is 32, has no GT podiums, no GT top 5s, no GT top 10s. His best ever GT result, in no less than twelve starts, has been fifteenth. If Thomas wins this Tour (I don’t think he will), he will be the biggest GT nobody to win a Tour de France since WW2 and in a class of two modern GT winners with Mauri.
You can make a reasonable argument that Thomas was at least always obviously talented as a cyclist. You cannot make a reasonable argument that Thomas showed any signs of being a GT winner. Doing so is simply partisan dishonesty. Cheer for a rider you admire if you like. Lie to yourself if you like. But don’t lie to the rest of us.
Ehmmmm like in 2015 he was 4th till 18th stage while being a domestique and gave up his GC to give Froome his bike.
Is that not potential to be a GT winner nowdays ??? :lol:
No, finishing 15th (that’s fifteenth) in your strongest GT in finish in 12 (yes twelve) GTs by the time you are 32 (thirty bloody two) is not “potential to be a GT winner nowadays” or ever. Nobody in the modern history of the sport has ever won the Tour with such a record and only one guy has ever won a GT with such a record, a Vuelta with an infinitely weaker field). Nobody. Ever.
Zinoviev Letter said:Geraint Too Fast said:Lol. No.
Chris Froome won his first GT as a mere child of 28 and at that point had already achieved two GT podiums. Geraint Thomas is 32, has no GT podiums, no GT top 5s, no GT top 10s. His best ever GT result, in no less than twelve starts, has been fifteenth. If Thomas wins this Tour (I don’t think he will), he will be the biggest GT nobody to win a Tour de France since WW2 and in a class of two modern GT winners with Mauri.
You can make a reasonable argument that Thomas was at least always obviously talented as a cyclist. You cannot make a reasonable argument that Thomas showed any signs of being a GT winner. Doing so is simply partisan dishonesty. Cheer for a rider you admire if you like. Lie to yourself if you like. But don’t lie to the rest of us.
MuskyOurSaviour said:Zinoviev Letter said:MuskyOurSaviour said:Zinoviev Letter said:Geraint Too Fast said:Lol. No.
Chris Froome won his first GT as a mere child of 28 and at that point had already achieved two GT podiums. Geraint Thomas is 32, has no GT podiums, no GT top 5s, no GT top 10s. His best ever GT result, in no less than twelve starts, has been fifteenth. If Thomas wins this Tour (I don’t think he will), he will be the biggest GT nobody to win a Tour de France since WW2 and in a class of two modern GT winners with Mauri.
You can make a reasonable argument that Thomas was at least always obviously talented as a cyclist. You cannot make a reasonable argument that Thomas showed any signs of being a GT winner. Doing so is simply partisan dishonesty. Cheer for a rider you admire if you like. Lie to yourself if you like. But don’t lie to the rest of us.
Ehmmmm like in 2015 he was 4th till 18th stage while being a domestique and gave up his GC to give Froome his bike.
Is that not potential to be a GT winner nowdays ??? :lol:
No, finishing 15th (that’s fifteenth) in your strongest GT in finish in 12 (yes twelve) GTs by the time you are 32 (thirty bloody two) is not “potential to be a GT winner nowadays” or ever. Nobody in the modern history of the sport has ever won the Tour with such a record and only one guy has ever won a GT with such a record, a Vuelta with an infinitely weaker field). Nobody. Ever.
Yes so if you completely disregard what happened in races and what potential he has shown then yes he is nothing.
What useless comparison than you're making.
Gigs_98 said:Oh boy, this again. The guy who closed his eyes for the whole 2015 tour the France just to open them to look at the final gc. Yeah, Thomas never showed any potential at all. This must have been the first time he has ever climbed well, right?Zinoviev Letter said:MuskyOurSaviour said:Zinoviev Letter said:Geraint Too Fast said:Lol. No.
Chris Froome won his first GT as a mere child of 28 and at that point had already achieved two GT podiums. Geraint Thomas is 32, has no GT podiums, no GT top 5s, no GT top 10s. His best ever GT result, in no less than twelve starts, has been fifteenth. If Thomas wins this Tour (I don’t think he will), he will be the biggest GT nobody to win a Tour de France since WW2 and in a class of two modern GT winners with Mauri.
You can make a reasonable argument that Thomas was at least always obviously talented as a cyclist. You cannot make a reasonable argument that Thomas showed any signs of being a GT winner. Doing so is simply partisan dishonesty. Cheer for a rider you admire if you like. Lie to yourself if you like. But don’t lie to the rest of us.
Ehmmmm like in 2015 he was 4th till 18th stage while being a domestique and gave up his GC to give Froome his bike.
Is that not potential to be a GT winner nowdays ??? :lol:
No, finishing 15th (that’s fifteenth) in your strongest GT in finish in 12 (yes twelve) GTs by the time you are 32 (thirty bloody two) is not “potential to be a GT winner nowadays” or ever. Nobody in the modern history of the sport has ever won the Tour with such a record and only one guy has ever won a GT with such a record, a Vuelta with an infinitely weaker field). Nobody. Ever.![]()
I’m not disregarding what happened in races. I’m paying attention to the most important thing about races, their results. And I’m paying attention to those results in the way which tells us most about the capacities of the riders in question, their slow accumulation over time. Nobody in the history of the sport has such bad GT GC results for so long before winning the Tour or any GT. Not one rider, on any team, with any excuse, in any era since the war.MuskyOurSaviour said:Zinoviev Letter said:MuskyOurSaviour said:Zinoviev Letter said:Geraint Too Fast said:Lol. No.
Chris Froome won his first GT as a mere child of 28 and at that point had already achieved two GT podiums. Geraint Thomas is 32, has no GT podiums, no GT top 5s, no GT top 10s. His best ever GT result, in no less than twelve starts, has been fifteenth. If Thomas wins this Tour (I don’t think he will), he will be the biggest GT nobody to win a Tour de France since WW2 and in a class of two modern GT winners with Mauri.
You can make a reasonable argument that Thomas was at least always obviously talented as a cyclist. You cannot make a reasonable argument that Thomas showed any signs of being a GT winner. Doing so is simply partisan dishonesty. Cheer for a rider you admire if you like. Lie to yourself if you like. But don’t lie to the rest of us.
Ehmmmm like in 2015 he was 4th till 18th stage while being a domestique and gave up his GC to give Froome his bike.
Is that not potential to be a GT winner nowdays ??? :lol:
No, finishing 15th (that’s fifteenth) in your strongest GT in finish in 12 (yes twelve) GTs by the time you are 32 (thirty bloody two) is not “potential to be a GT winner nowadays” or ever. Nobody in the modern history of the sport has ever won the Tour with such a record and only one guy has ever won a GT with such a record, a Vuelta with an infinitely weaker field). Nobody. Ever.
Yes so if you completely disregard what happened in races and what potential he has shown then yes he is nothing.
What useless comparison than you're making.
What Bardet and him did was the same thing. Really. Two mountain goats being exposed by the Sky riders and playing with each other like idiots. You blame one, you need to blame the other.Alexandre B. said:Nairo Quintana is a disgrace of a GC rider.