LeMond I

Page 62 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Gentle(wo)men,
although its intriguing to read about Virenque, this is the LeMond thread.

I am not going to delete the last half dozen posts which suddenly veered, but please get back on topic

cheers

bison
 
Let's segway then. I heard that Bassons could beat Virenque in off-season training rides. Being (far) off the winning pace in the off-season is something to look at in suspected dopers perhaps.

Any reports of Lemond being shown any rear wheels when battling it out with team mates or any human being for that matter, on hard off-season rides?
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
Cloxxki said:
Let's segway then. I heard that Bassons could beat Virenque in off-season training rides. Being (far) off the winning pace in the off-season is something to look at in suspected dopers perhaps.

Any reports of Lemond being shown any rear wheels when battling it out with team mates or any human being for that matter, on hard off-season rides?
no, but chavanel used to kill all training rides he was ever on in the off season, then be little more than pack fodder.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
1
0
Armstrong pushed an organized campaign to smear Greg. One of his inventions was that some Iron that Greg took was EPO....Nonsense

Great interview here, Kimmage and Lemond


https://www.facebook.com/2Rmag


That was the second stage - stifling hot. I remember it well.
The reality was that I had lost conditioning. I was psychologically stressed and Otto Jacome (his soigneur) kept saying that I was grey. And I was grey the whole year before. I had never taken an iron shot; I didn’t believe you needed them. I believed that you could get everything you want out of your food but my blood volume had gone down 60% (after the accident) and I had no ferritin stores. Otto was saying ‘Greg, you look like a woman menstruating – you’re grey.’ But I was not willing to take an iron shot.

Why wouldn’t you take an iron shot?
Greg: I was needle-averse. From the day I was born, I’ve had these chronic kidney infections…

You were needle-averse?
Greg: I had to go to the doctor to get antibiotic shots (for the kidney infection) as a kid. I remember I ran out of the office and my mom was chasing me through the forest and I’ve always (hated needles)…Especially a needle in the ****.

And that was right through your career?
Greg: Yeah.

No injections?
Greg: I’ve never had an IV, never believed you needed it – that’s where Köchli was really good but also I did my own research and unless you are on the verge of death and heat exhaustion, there is no reason to have an IV, zero reason.

There is a huge culture of the needle in cycling.
Greg: Well, they all took Vitamin B12 shots…I mean, who knows what else they took.

You never succumbed?
Greg: Never. I took a multi-vitamin if I remembered to take a multi-vitamin...It might be every six weeks.

And when you shared rooms with the French guys?
Greg: I didn’t see it.

You didn’t see any of them doing it?
Greg: No, never saw anybody…I remember my first year pro at the team presentation, my wife was sitting with Jonathan Boyer’s wife, and Jonathan Boyer’s wife said ‘Well now that Greg’s pro, he’s going to have to take drugs.’ And my wife’s like ‘What! He’s not going to take drugs. He’d rather quit.’ And she got up and said ‘You are so ****ing naïve…you are a stupid naïve *****.’
Kathy: Yes, I do recall that. It shocked me. I don’t remember if she called me a ***** but she did go off on me that I was ‘f’ing naïve.’ I also responded that, ‘We agreed that Greg isn’t going to use drugs. He’ll ride pro until he is 23 and if he can’t make it we’ll go home.’

So you didn’t see it with Renault?
Greg: No.

But you were aware of the culture?
Greg: Yeah, but it didn’t matter to me.

Okay, go back to the Giro and the Lavaredo?
Greg: Okay, so Yvan Van Mol, whom I had never met, was coming down to see the riders and Otto had been pushing me to go and see a doctor to get my blood levels checked. And honestly, I know that if you eat right you should be able to take iron in, and I ate a lot of red meat so I was like ‘Otto, I don’t feel like doing it.’ Part of it was that I didn’t believe that was my problem; and I don’t believe that was the only thing that changed for me there. But I believe it helped, no doubt, because my iron stores were zero. So Yvan took a blood test and said ‘Well, three shots are not going to hurt you. But it’s a treatment of three. And you need it today, three days and three days.’

Now years later, when Armstrong called you and accused you of doing EPO, he mentioned Van Mol. But I always understood that it was Otto Jacome who gave you the injection?
Greg: It was Van Mol.

Because Otto didn’t do any of that?
Greg: No, but he (Van Mol) left me with two more iron (injections) and I had to figure out how to get Otto to help me, because I could not do it myself. And even when Yvan was trying to give it to me, I walked around the room four times. But I watched everything he did and it was iron.

And you got the first injection on the night after the Lavaredo stage?
Greg: Yeah, I think it was at Lavaredo. Because I had called Kathy after Lavaredo…was the next day when it was cancelled?

No, there was the really snowy mountain stage and then the split stage and then the next day was cancelled.
Kathy: I was there for that.
Greg: But Tre Cime di Lavaredo was the day I lost 17 minutes and I called you…
Kathy: I was at home for that and then I flew over.
Greg: I was just trying to figure out when I had the iron shot.
Kathy: You got it…I was there, in the room.
Greg: So that was two days later?
Kathy: Yeah. But it is…we feel the same about the iron shot and the climate and all the questions about that. Even now, in hindsight, I can see why people ask ‘Are you sure?’ Even John Wilcockson writes about it! But people were there, (Wilcockson) was there. If you are doing something illicit, you are not going to have a journalist standing in the room.
Greg: If you’re doing something you don’t tell everybody. I just talked about it because…Why did I start feeling good? I don’t know. Maybe it was the pressure…maybe it was because I’d had some iron that I needed, because if you don’t have iron, you cannot bind oxygen. With no iron, there is nothing to bind. And then I had two days of rest which were critical.

So that would have been the cancelled stage (the 16th stage was cancelled due to a landslide on the Gavia) and the short mountain time trial?
Greg: Yeah. I mean, once you get into a three week stage race, and you’re bad, it’s really hard to get better unless you have a couple of days rest. Psychologically I imploded. I let a big pressure valve off with Kathy and already I felt better.
Kathy: The stress relief was huge. The baby was going to be okay. We decided ‘You know what? If you’re done, you’re done. It’s okay. We’ll be fine.’ Even if it meant we were going to go back and I’d work at the grocery store. I said ‘I’m okay if you stop. It’s okay, you don’t have to do this, but just make sure you gave it everything you could so you don’t have regrets.’ And I think that was good. But knowing him now, if I had put additional pressure on him, that was the end.
Greg: After Tre Cime di Lavaredo I started feeling better, and then I had two rest days. I did the (mountain) time trial with no warm-up, just did it – it was like a 30 minute time trial. And then the next stage was the first stage when I thought ‘Oh, my legs are good.’ I was riding better; instead of getting dropped I was able to stay in the front group and you can just tell when you are getting your power back but I had no clue where I stood. Typically, if you’re in a stage race like that and you’re out of it, it’s hard to push yourself in a time trial unless you are in the game. So I tried to (test myself) and José de Cauwer wanted me to do it too. He said ‘Just test where you’re at.’

This was the Giro’s final time trial in Florence?
Greg: Yeah. I know how I do time trials when I’m in good shape; I don’t want a split, I don’t want anything, I just go 100%. And I took off and I caught rider after rider and it felt good. I thought ‘I don’t know how anybody is going to beat me’ because I had a really good day and I ended up getting second (to Lech Piesecki) and I beat Fignon by about a minute and twenty-one seconds. That gave me a little hope but I had no confidence for the Tour. Zero. I mean, climbing…
 
Race Radio said:
Armstrong pushed an organized campaign to smear Greg. One of his inventions was that some Iron that Greg took was EPO....Nonsense

Great interview here, Kimmage and Lemond


https://www.facebook.com/2Rmag

Receiving an injection of any type from Yvan Van Mol is enough to raise eyebrows.

If any rider today received "vitamin" treatment from a known doping doctor, It would have the clinic massive, hollering like a group of apes..... Never mind a doping doctor who the rider had allegedly never met before.

FWIW, I'm not attempting to accuse LeMond, just pointing out that what is good for the goose, should be good for the gander.
 
Funny also that Greg told Paul that he was "needle adverse".
I thought I remembered Lemond saying he drew a syringe of his
own blood. Check out the Sports Illustrated archives (search
Greg Lemond - 07.05.93 - SI Vault) Greg says he withdrew a
syringe of his own blood and then drove two hours to the
university clinic in Hasselt, Belgium to try and figure out what
the illness was that had forced him to pull out of three stage
races early in 1993.
I can imagine the uproar if it was revealed that BMW was
drawing his own blood and driving to a university clinic with it.
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
andy1234 said:
Receiving an injection of any type from Yvan Van Mol is enough to raise eyebrows.

If any rider today received "vitamin" treatment from a known doping doctor, It would have the clinic massive, hollering like a group of apes..... Never mind a doping doctor who the rider had allegedly never met before.

FWIW, I'm not attempting to accuse LeMond, just pointing out that what is good for the goose, should be good for the gander.

So your only contribution is to try and do a "leave Sky alone" post.

Receiving an injection from YVM does raise eyebrows, and does raise questions, which were asked and again LeMond has answered consistently.
 
Apr 20, 2012
6,320
0
0
Dr. Maserati said:
So your only contribution is to try and do a "leave Sky alone" post.

Receiving an injection from YVM does raise eyebrows, and does raise questions, which were asked and again LeMond has answered consistently.
Van Mol was just ADR's team doc, nothing more, nothing less. You know what, LeMond went to Leuven in 1993 to see van Mol to know if anything was wrong with him, van Mol told him to go to Italy, where the real 'specialists' were.

Van Mol is/was a doping doc, for dopers.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
1
0
oldcrank said:
Funny also that Greg told Paul that he was "needle adverse".

Not funny. It is consistent with what he said 25 years ago

Directly after the injection he went downstairs of the hotel to have an interview with a journalist. He spent the 1st 10 minutes of the interview talking about the Iron shot and how he hated needles, not just because of the pain but because of what they represented in the sport.
 
He was "needle adverse" yet in 1993 he had the syringe,
the ability and knowledge to draw his own blood? Nurses
and doctors have difficulty drawing patients blood on
many occasions even though they are trained, yet a
"needle adverse" athlete draws his own blood no problem
the first time? Are we to assume it was the first time, or
had he been doing it often since, let's say, 1984 when his
coach and life long friend Eddy B. started other American
cyclists on that path? Note: I am not accusing Lemond of
blood doping, perhaps he just forgot to tell Kimmage that
even though he was "needle adverse" he was able to take
his own blood samples. Greg Lemond I know you must
read this forum, please clear this up before someone
jumps to the wrong conclusion.
 
oldcrank said:
He was "needle adverse" yet in 1993 he had the syringe,
the ability and knowledge to draw his own blood?

!!!![Insert shocking music here]!!!!!!

I could draw my own blood. *** the vein and the blood flows. It's not hard.

oldcrank said:
Nurses
and doctors have difficulty drawing patients blood on
many occasions even though they are trained

Now you are making stuff up to fan the flames of controversy.

I don't like swallowing big vitamin pills and yet I do it every day. I will gladly complain about it to you, on the Twitterer or FacingBook or whatever. I know you live your life with perfect consistency, but us mere mortals don't.

Seriously, how long has it been and not a single person that would be required to coordinate the doping has come forward with specific facts.

You can keep trying, but it's going nowhere.
 
Jun 11, 2012
88
0
0
Fearless Greg Lemond said:
Van Mol was just ADR's team doc, nothing more, nothing less. You know what, LeMond went to Leuven in 1993 to see van Mol to know if anything was wrong with him, van Mol told him to go to Italy, where the real 'specialists' were.

Van Mol is/was a doping doc, for dopers.

Van Mol was my team doctor at ADR too... ergo, are you calling me a doper mate? Not advised...
 
Jul 5, 2009
2,440
4
0
oldcrank said:
He was "needle adverse" yet in 1993 he had the syringe,
the ability and knowledge to draw his own blood? Nurses
and doctors have difficulty drawing patients blood on
many occasions even though they are trained, yet a
"needle adverse" athlete draws his own blood no problem
the first time? Are we to assume it was the first time, or
had he been doing it often since, let's say, 1984 when his
coach and life long friend Eddy B. started other American
cyclists on that path? Note: I am not accusing Lemond of
blood doping, perhaps he just forgot to tell Kimmage that
even though he was "needle adverse" he was able to take
his own blood samples. Greg Lemond I know you must
read this forum, please clear this up before someone
jumps to the wrong conclusion.

Jesus. What an a$$hole. Lemond is flawed, and in ways that are the opposite of the traits of a psychopath. He questions himself and his motives at every step. He has fears and anxieties. He feels, that despite being a true (absolute, 100% based on his own merits) champion, that he somehow doesn't measure up.

You know what? He's clean. Squeaky clean. And if I ever get the chance to give him a hug and tell him what a wonderful person he is, I will. I'm sure his friends and family do it all the time. My sincerest hope is that he believes it.

John Swanson
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
oldcrank said:
He was "needle adverse" yet in 1993 he had the syringe,
the ability and knowledge to draw his own blood? Nurses
and doctors have difficulty drawing patients blood on
many occasions even though they are trained, yet a
"needle adverse" athlete draws his own blood no problem
the first time? Are we to assume it was the first time, or
had he been doing it often since, let's say, 1984 when his
coach and life long friend Eddy B. started other American
cyclists on that path? Note: I am not accusing Lemond of
blood doping, perhaps he just forgot to tell Kimmage that
even though he was "needle adverse" he was able to take
his own blood samples. Greg Lemond I know you must
read this forum, please clear this up before someone
jumps to the wrong conclusion.

Since your imagination is running wild don't forget that Greg said he got 'injections' for 'kidney infection' *wink, wink* when he was a kid.
Now I am not suggesting that this was where he learned to do blood transfusions and EpO (no siree) but its strange that he transformed only a few short decades later in to a Grand Tour champ.

Ps you think Greg is here? Is it Andy1234? Just give a wink if I am warm.
 
Jul 25, 2010
372
0
0
oldcrank said:
Funny also that Greg told Paul that he was "needle adverse".
I thought I remembered Lemond saying he drew a syringe of his
own blood. Check out the Sports Illustrated archives (search
Greg Lemond - 07.05.93 - SI Vault) Greg says he withdrew a
syringe of his own blood and then drove two hours to the
university clinic in Hasselt, Belgium to try and figure out what
the illness was that had forced him to pull out of three stage
races early in 1993.
I can imagine the uproar if it was revealed that BMW was
drawing his own blood and driving to a university clinic with it.

Sounds like he was mentally suffering. When you're cracking up, you do things out of character. We've all done it.
 
Dr. Maserati said:
Since your imagination is running wild
No, Doctor, my imagination has nothing to do with this.
I just want an explanation from Greg Lemond why he
told Paul Kimmage that he was "needle adverse" yet
years earlier he was taking his own blood samples as
reported in Sports Illustrated 07.05.93. Perhaps there
is a very good explanation for this inconsistency, but I
think we should hear it from the man himself.
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
oldcrank said:
No, Doctor, my imagination has nothing to do with this.
I just want an explanation from Greg Lemond why he
told Paul Kimmage that he was "needle adverse" yet
years earlier he was taking his own blood samples as
reported in Sports Illustrated 07.05.93. Perhaps there
is a very good explanation for this inconsistency, but I
think we should hear it from the man himself.

Ah, your imagination is definitely in over drive if you think LeMond is going to appear and give you an explanation.
 
Dr. Maserati said:
Ah, your imagination is definitely in over drive if you think LeMond is going to appear and give you an explanation.
I think Paul Kimmage deserves the explanation, not me. It was
Paul Kimmage whom Greg told he was "needle adverse" even
though was taking his own blood samples. If it was Greg's
father-in-law who taught him how to take blood samples,
fine, but Greg owes it to Paul to let him know to clear up
this glaring inconsistency with what he told Mr. Kimmage.
Mr. Kimmage wrote what Greg told him in good faith, so it
is he who deserves the clarification.
 
Jan 20, 2013
897
0
0
oldcrank said:
Funny also that Greg told Paul that he was "needle adverse".
I thought I remembered Lemond saying he drew a syringe of his
own blood. Check out the Sports Illustrated archives (search
Greg Lemond - 07.05.93 - SI Vault) Greg says he withdrew a
syringe of his own blood and then drove two hours to the
university clinic in Hasselt, Belgium to try and figure out what
the illness was that had forced him to pull out of three stage
races early in 1993.
I can imagine the uproar if it was revealed that BMW was
drawing his own blood and driving to a university clinic with it.

It may be more the case of was he doping as a a nice guy or a bad guy?. I would say on balance he was a nice guy. But there are an awful lot of superlatives when watching him race back in the day.
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
oldcrank said:
I think Paul Kimmage deserves the explanation, not me. It was
Paul Kimmage whom Greg told he was "needle adverse" even
though was taking his own blood samples. If it was Greg's
father-in-law who taught him how to take blood samples,
fine, but Greg owes it to Paul to let him know to clear up
this glaring inconsistency with what he told Mr. Kimmage.
Mr. Kimmage wrote what Greg told him in good faith, so it
is he who deserves the clarification.

Would that not be up to Paul Kimmage to decide?

Reading the full article it LeMond mention he is "needle adverse" when he is being questioned about the 3 injections he received.

I am adverse to dentists. Don't like them, hate going to them - I go about every 6 months.
 
Dr. Maserati said:
So your only contribution is to try and do a "leave Sky alone" post.

Receiving an injection from YVM does raise eyebrows, and does raise questions, which were asked and again LeMond has answered consistently.

Every tour winner deserves to have their every action analysed, time and time and time again.
Its the clinic job. It ensures nothing slips through the net, no matter how honest the subject claims to be.
Good investigative principles, right there...

LeMond, Wiggins, Armstrong.....no one gets a pass..

I knew you would understand Doc.
 
Apr 20, 2012
6,320
0
0
esafosfina said:
Van Mol was my team doctor at ADR too... ergo, are you calling me a doper mate? Not advised...
He was a doctor to non and a doping doc for dopers. Sorry if you misunderstood me.

What he did/does with Lefevre is something different, maybe he is also just trying to survive in the metier.
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
andy1234 said:
Every tour winner deserves to have their every action analysed, time and time and time again.
Its the clinic job. It ensures nothing slips through the net, no matter how honest the subject claims to be.
Good investigative principles, right there...

LeMond, Wiggins, Armstrong.....no one gets a pass..

I knew you would understand Doc.

Not only do I understand it is a principal I stand by.

LeMond like anyone else should be queried and examined vigorously - and at any point that you have something to offer please let us know.
 
Dr. Maserati said:
Not only do I understand it is a principal I stand by.

LeMond like anyone else should be queried and examined vigorously - and at any point that you have something to offer please let us know.

Who needs anything to offer?

All that is required is that every action, regardless of how tenuous, is analysed until a line of dots suddenly appears.....or doesn't.

Being injected by a doping doctor, and subsequently having a dramatic increase in performance, is equally worthy of discussion and suspicion.

As per usual clinic practice, until LeMond can prove that this suspicious chain of events was legitimate, he must remain under suspicion.
It's the way of the clinic......

Don't you love it?
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
andy1234 said:
Who needs anything to offer?

All that is required is that every action, regardless of how tenuous, is analysed until a line of dots suddenly appears.....or doesn't.
If that is what you use you are certainly entitled to do so.

I can say it is not mine, and I don't believe you are talking for (or indeed asking)
The Clinic.
andy1234 said:
Being injected by a doping doctor, and subsequently having a dramatic increase in performance, is equally worthy of discussion and suspicion.

As per usual clinic practice, until LeMond can prove that this suspicious chain of events was legitimate, he must remain under suspicion.
It's the way of the clinic......

Don't you love it?
Again, you appear to be talking about yourself here.

If you have something to discuss or add about LeMond, here is the place. But you appear to be in philosophical mood, so I suggest you open a separate thread for your couch session. .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.