Why, though? Sure, the start list isn't stellar, but there are four World Tour teams, which is in line with other .Pro races as well. ZLM had three last year, for example, Tour of Britain five. 2021 Plumelec (3) and Dwars door het Hageland (5), among others, were in a similar range as well.
I don't think there are strict guidelines about it, but if it was an issue, UCI would downgrade them, I think?! And that most likely would lead to even worse competition, so not sure how anyone would benefit from doing that, if not absolutely necessary.
So it isn't in line with most other 1.Pro races? You are indeed naming the other bad .Pro races, 2 of them being stage races, that's why I named 1.Pro, not 2.Pro. Yes Hageland is also bad, but it still has more (and I don't think that race deserves .Pro at all). This one has like 3 and a half, with Astana being the half. That team shouldn't even be PCT anymore.
The issue is obviously UCI points. Before the war for points this wouldn't matter, now it does. If you make your UCI ranking so important you can't have races with super weak start lists giving out a massive amount of points. It's an easy point grab. EF might just get over 600 points this week in Italy, super smart (they finally realized how to get points this year), but also a bit stupid.
Honestly while I agree some races would have even worse competition with a downgrade, I don't believe this one would, That's how bad the competition is. All those teams would still be here, as it's the typical teams that do those Italian races.
I don't want the downgrade btw, Italy deserves some good .Pro races, but they should give it another spot on the calendar, so teams actually go there with decent riders.
Not going to discuss this further, I've made my point. Still don't get why you were pretending like I've been repeating this 10 times when I've never mentioned Industria before.