• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Logisitcs

Page 3 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
A

Anonymous

Guest
BanProCycling said:
Interesting. You have only made 12 posts, most of them in recent days, yet you've been registered since March, and like some others you reference this former poster, 'House', as if you've been posting in threads a lot.

That makes you a muliple accounts suspect. Probably the FoodforThought troll. He also says "shtick".

You just keep getting better and better. I am honestly in awe of your trollkraft. You keep up the good work!
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
BanProCycling said:
I've noted they really don't like typos if you disagree with them on this forum. Internet spelling is a key part of whether you are a real cycling fan of course.

...no, just spelling. I am not aware of what "internet spelling" is, but I am glad you have returned to your "stupid Lance fan" persona and quit talking about "science" stuff. I was starting to get worried that you were blowing your cover. Keep up the good work!
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
BanProCycling said:
Now, can we think of anybody on this forum who might be being paid to be a stupid anti Armstrong troll? Hmmmm. It's a difficult one....

You caught me Sherlock Holmes, I am paid by a consortium of people who hate bullies and people who act like 12 year old girls. The want me to battle you, but I keep telling them that you are really a Lance hater who is just having a bit of fun because it would be impossible to have those moronic opinions and have an IQ high enough to think anything but "Step, breathe, step, breathe, blink, breathe, step, step, step, blink, GASP, GASP, blink"
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
BanProCycling said:
They won't like the fact you go around sniping at people and act like a 12 year old girl then.

13, its why they hired me. I only need a year's head start to do the job. Easy job really, great benefits too!
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,855
1
0
Visit site
BanProCycling said:
Thanks for backing me up. I get a lot of inaccurate remarks directed at me.




You don't know this to be true. It may well have been extremely risky. As a few brave other posters have said, it's not realistic to believe this was the normal operation for most teams. Nobody has attempted to contradict this. You haven't thought through the scale of what is involved.



That line is getting pretty trite now.



Yes anybody who has even just read Armstrong's book will know about the type of hotels that riders use in this little races around Europe. But this is not so much the case for the grand tours - the subject under discussion - and certainly not the case for Astana this year and the other big teams. LA had penthouse suites most of the time. Again you're not up to speed about how game is played these days.



Don't be a troll.

You are slipping, but the "LA had penthouse suites most of the time" is one of your most trolltastic lines yet.

My experience is first hand, not from Armstrong's propaganda books
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,855
1
0
Visit site
BanProCycling said:
Um, why? It's in the anti Armstrong articles about how Contador was treated during the tour. Are they wrong?



I don't know what this means. You're saying Armstrong is lying about staying in crappy hotels in the early part of his career in the smaller races?

tired-sleeping-smiley-17370.gif


Your schitck is getting weaker by the day. Maybe it is time to try yet another username? Maybe you can combine your last two, BanProArbiter sounds good
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,855
1
0
Visit site
BanProCycling said:
I did warn you about trolling. If you can't engage then best stay out. It spoils the threads for others.

Does this mean you are going to leave? You are the biggest troll here.

Going to miss you.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
BanProCycling said:
I did warn you about trolling. If you can't engage then best stay out. It spoils the threads for others.

It NEVER gets old! NEVER!
 
BanProCycling said:
So you're saying one clinic was providing blood bags for all the tour riders and motorcycles were busily coming in and out transporting in front of everybody to all the riders, all over Europe...la..la..la?
I hope you really get banned. I am getting tired of you derailing every Thread in this Forum. Why don't you go to the other side of the Forum please. I usually enjoy reading the Clinic every week and learn a lot of stuff, but you are disrupting the flow of the discussion. Please stay out of this Forum.
Thanks.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
BanProCycling said:
I have consistently been anti troll.

In words or actions?

BanProCycling said:
You guys (you, Foodforthought), however, admit to getting banned from RBR for trolling,

Yes, it was great fun toying with the moron fanboys there, good times, good times.

BanProCycling said:
constantly pretend I am someone I am not,

Yes, yes, we know.

BanProCycling said:
take absurd stances on issues - like this thread

Again with the introspection. You are getting good at this thing.

BanProCycling said:
- in order just to say the opposite of what I am saying and are generally into name calling and behave in a very petty manner.

Man, LET THE HEALING BEGIN!!!!

BanProCycling said:
Every time you are stuck for an answer, such as why Armstrong was lie about staying in crap hotels in his early career, or why anti Armstrong reports would like about him getting the best rooms in good hotels in the last tour, you resort to this troll nonsense.

Now if we can just work on the grammar thing, your mom will be soooo proud!
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,855
1
0
Visit site
BanProCycling said:
Why don't you hope the people that are trolling get banned? Read the thread. Others have raised precisely the same concerns about this issue as I have, yet all they are doing is trying to troll me. I have repeatedly warned them that it spoils the thread for others but they don't seem to care. You obviously don't care either if you are targeting me rather than them.

We can all agree that you already know the answer to your post. Your questions are answered, you are proven wrong, and you ask more *** questions..... high jacking the thread into your nonsense world.

If you continually act like a troll don't be surprised when someone calls you a troll. When you continue to write *** posts don't be surprised when someone calls you a ***.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
BanProCycling said:
Of course I'm not stupid. They do this precisely to try to get me to go down to their level, and then be able to claim I am trolling. They can't stand people who disagree with them being allowed to post in the forum. They think because few have the courage to speak up against them that this means everyone agrees with them. Not so.

No, you are something far dumber.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
BanProCycling said:
Game, set and match. I couldn't give a better example for why this individual is a troll. Nobody can deny this.

Kid, run along now before the mods lose their patience.

I am not an individual, I am a consortium of people, we have been over that.
 
Mar 18, 2009
324
0
0
Visit site
BanProCycling said:
Now, can we think of anybody on this forum who might be being paid to be a stupid anti Armstrong troll? Hmmmm. It's a difficult one....
How did you make it out of grammar school... assuming you did... nevermind. I answered my own question.
 
BanProCycling said:
Why don't you hope the people that are trolling get banned? Read the thread. Others have raised precisely the same concerns about this issue as I have, yet all they are doing is trying to troll me. I have repeatedly warned them that it spoils the thread for others but they don't seem to care. You obviously don't care either if you are targeting me rather than them.
The reason why I said that is because you are always picking which topic and who you answer to. That is because when somebody throws a good fact at you don't reply to that person. There has been in the past some solid evidence of blood doping logistics:

1- Kohl’s confession
2- Patrick Sinkewitz confession.

And as other poster already stated very clearly, the ~50 bags that belonged to cyclists in the Operacion Puerto were most likely going to be used in the Grand Tours. Especially the Tour de France. When you are start making fun of the motorcycle stories it tells me that you are not credible and just want to derail the main topic in this forum. Your answers don't make any sense and sometimes don't have any connection with what other posters are saying. That's the main reason why I hope you get banned. Because it looks like you are doing it on purpose.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
BanProCycling said:
The questions haven't been answered at all and instead you have gone off topic with insults and silliness. Nobody has convinced the guy who started the thread either, so you are in no position to declare the debate over and everyone who disagrees with you to be trolling.

If you aren't able to deal with peoples questions then keep your trap shut. It just disrupts the thread for others.

Seriously, you are the best troll on this site. I am again humbled by your trollkraft. You are special indeed.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,855
1
0
Visit site
BanProCycling said:
The questions haven't been answered at all and instead you have gone off topic with insults and silliness. Nobody has convinced the guy who started the thread either, so you are in no position to declare the debate over and everyone who disagrees with you to be trolling.

If you aren't able to deal with peoples questions then keep your trap shut. It just disrupts the thread for others.

It appears you struggle with reading as well as spelling. The question has been answered multiple times.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
BanProCycling said:
No doubt about it - this troll should be banned.

No, I like having you around. Why do you want yourself banned?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
BanProCycling said:
If you think the questions have been answered then stay out of the discussion. There is no need to resort to trolling.

By the way, guys, I don't how experienced you are at doing the message board/forum thing, but focusing on grammer and spelling automatically means you've lost the argument. Just thought I'd let you know about that - it has been amusing to watch people on that one.

I don't know how experienced you are in the usage of grammar (actually I do), but consistently showing your lack of knowledge in this area means you continue to look moronic. (not saying that you are a moron, just that from your language, you appear to be moronic. I actually don't believe a thing that you write, and am convinced the spelling and grammar errors are part of the ruse. You are not at all what you claim, that I am sure of.)

Hey, this is Belokki isn't it? She/he/it showed just your level of intelligence.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
BanProCycling said:
You've focused in on one reply where I was a little frustrated with the individual's set of questions and threw back at him what I believe was his own style. Nobody has denied that blood doping has gone on, but some of us believe the logistics of it makes it a lot less likely to happen than is perceived in the rumour mill. The idea that most teams would have blood bags running all over the country involved in the grand tour, and for not more mistakes to be made, more people to reveal what is going on, more chances of bags being found, is not credible to us. Especially for the big teams that come under such heavy focus.

No, I am sure that those 50 bags of blood found in the gynecologist's office were for testing purposes and never meant to be injected back into the rider from wince they came. I also bet that Tyler and Perez didn't get their bags mixed up either. I am also sure that riders who transfuse always tell everyone around them what they are doing, and involve as many people as possible in their chain of doping. It just makes sense.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
BanProCycling said:
It says quite a lot about you that you would judge someone's intelligence on their spelling rather than what they are saying.

No, I judge you on both.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
BanProCycling said:
"oh I can't actually debate what you're saying so am resorting to playing the English teacher".

No, I can't debate what you are saying because you have no coherent, intelligent points. It has nothing to do with the grammar. The grammar thing is to help you learn the language you use to present your random and poorly thought out points.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
BanProCycling said:
No they will try to keep it as quiet as possible. This was touched on early on in the thread. That's why the hotel rooms and the motorbike guys become more important, and thus making it an even more incredible and risky operation. It's difficult to believe most teams would bother with it.

Well yea, except for the fact that they are trying to win a race in which other riders are blood doping, and to not do so would limit the ability of their riders in a SIGNIFICANT way. But other than that, no reason to bother.