Arnaud Demare told FFC.fr:
“We saw the echelons, we were in the wind, and when it was two minutes, it was all over. It is a total disappointment, we knew what to expect and we were trapped. We were many to miss out. Once it was decided in the wind, it was impossible to come back. The physical qualities made a difference for a rider like Sagan who rode thirty to forty meters in the wind to return to the first group. Physically, I had the means to do well, but maybe I was a little too patient to make the jump. We were trapped.
saganist said:![]()
Help me, is this Sagan starting to sprint to bridge into the first echelon? Watch the video here
https://youtu.be/ZeXEPOKKFps?t=2520
I do not have access to a HD version of the video and you can see it only for few seconds, but it does look his style.
doperhopper said:saganist said:![]()
Help me, is this Sagan starting to sprint to bridge into the first echelon? Watch the video here
https://youtu.be/ZeXEPOKKFps?t=2520
I do not have access to a HD version of the video and you can see it only for few seconds, but it does look his style.
Nope, I think nobody managed to bridge once that dutch guy gave up and caused the split (and nobody replaced him). Looks like Sagan realized what's coming when Belgians and British went upfront already before that critical turn into the crosswind... and marshalled his two teammates to the front.
Definitely Sagan. He wears the Slovakian jersey and was the only Slovakian with a black helmet.saganist said:![]()
Help me, is this Sagan starting to sprint to bridge into the first echelon? Watch the video here
https://youtu.be/ZeXEPOKKFps?t=2520
I do not have access to a HD version of the video and you can see it only for few seconds, but it does look his style.
Gigs_98 said:Definitely Sagan. He wears the Slovakian jersey and was the only Slovakian with a black helmet.saganist said:![]()
Help me, is this Sagan starting to sprint to bridge into the first echelon? Watch the video here
https://youtu.be/ZeXEPOKKFps?t=2520
I do not have access to a HD version of the video and you can see it only for few seconds, but it does look his style.
PunchingRouleur said:Arnaud Demare told FFC.fr:
“We saw the echelons, we were in the wind, and when it was two minutes, it was all over. It is a total disappointment, we knew what to expect and we were trapped. We were many to miss out. Once it was decided in the wind, it was impossible to come back. The physical qualities made a difference for a rider like Sagan who rode thirty to forty meters in the wind to return to the first group. Physically, I had the means to do well, but maybe I was a little too patient to make the jump. We were trapped.
I was just thinking about where the UCI would go, and that means the big cities on the Pampas and the coast are most likely. Although the Argentinian l'Étape type ride was around Bariloche, and I've drawn a few courses around there on the Race Design Thread (also a bumpy ride around Ushuaia...), so that could work as well.delgado said:why only consider the BA area? have it by the Andes, Mendoza, Salta, Tucuman and you have all the makings for a legendary and beautiful parcours. But i hear Races are being dropped, not pushed in Argentina, these daysLibertine Seguros said:Argentina (although opportunities for an exciting parcours are limited, though there is a short but steep hill around Mar del Plata somewhere)
Red Rick said:He'd be very highly dependent on both Cav and Sagan messing up their sprints. Both are riders with a pedigree of positioning themselves well. In fact, Cav did mess it up, and he still beat Boonen. If he didn't mess up, he'd do it with his eyes closed. I'm actually surprised Boonen got 3rd, and I think it's the maximum he could've hoped for.Flamin said:Red Rick said:Dekker_Tifosi said:What a sprint by Sagan. Twice world champion, last time in a row was Bettini right?
And never in my wildest dreams did I think Leezer would lead a world championship until 500m to go :lol: it was surreal. I wonder if Belgian didn't take up the mantle who would. Seemed they would've come too late.
I'm not sure why Belgium had so much faith in Boonen's sprint. They were the strongest team and I think they should've done things differently on the final circuit to make it harder for Sagan, Cavendish etc.. now I feel they just led them out. Boonen is still fast after a long race, but against these guys he'll only win 3/10 nowadays. A big gamble
Against Sagan and Cav, who spent the enitre day in the wheels? 30%? I'd take he over/under from that group on about 2%
Let's reverse roles. Sagan is in the wind from 200m to go and Boonen can come round Nizzolo in the final 100m. Boonen is favourite to win then. 2%, that's just silly, you know a lot more about cycling than that.
The last time Boonen won a sprint in a big race was more than 4 years ago. GW 2012 IIRC. Cav and Sagan had barely done any work. That's not a hard race that favours Boonen at all.
Still, only the biggest optimist in the world could honestly think he was the favourite against these other sprinters. The Belgians messed up by destroying all of their riders till the last km. When the second group gave up, they could have played a bit with Greg, Naesen or others.Flamin said:Red Rick said:He'd be very highly dependent on both Cav and Sagan messing up their sprints. Both are riders with a pedigree of positioning themselves well. In fact, Cav did mess it up, and he still beat Boonen. If he didn't mess up, he'd do it with his eyes closed. I'm actually surprised Boonen got 3rd, and I think it's the maximum he could've hoped for.Flamin said:Red Rick said:Dekker_Tifosi said:What a sprint by Sagan. Twice world champion, last time in a row was Bettini right?
And never in my wildest dreams did I think Leezer would lead a world championship until 500m to go :lol: it was surreal. I wonder if Belgian didn't take up the mantle who would. Seemed they would've come too late.
I'm not sure why Belgium had so much faith in Boonen's sprint. They were the strongest team and I think they should've done things differently on the final circuit to make it harder for Sagan, Cavendish etc.. now I feel they just led them out. Boonen is still fast after a long race, but against these guys he'll only win 3/10 nowadays. A big gamble
Against Sagan and Cav, who spent the enitre day in the wheels? 30%? I'd take he over/under from that group on about 2%
Let's reverse roles. Sagan is in the wind from 200m to go and Boonen can come round Nizzolo in the final 100m. Boonen is favourite to win then. 2%, that's just silly, you know a lot more about cycling than that.
The last time Boonen won a sprint in a big race was more than 4 years ago. GW 2012 IIRC. Cav and Sagan had barely done any work. That's not a hard race that favours Boonen at all.
He 'still' beat Boonen? Boonen also rode a far from perfect sprint so that's hardly a strong argument. Of course you need luck as well. Sagan did have loads of it, remember? Without luck, he would have been 5th or so. Boonen imo had the legs to win if he had the luck Sagan had.
He won a sprint after 200k against Bouhanni and Demare recently. Not Cav-Sagan level, but not too shabby either. And it was a hard race. An hour of racing full in the wind, the heat,...
Agreed. About two hundred metres further on at the next right hander you can clearly see him rounding the corner having just made it on to the back of the first echelon.Gigs_98 said:Definitely Sagan. He wears the Slovakian jersey and was the only Slovakian with a black helmet.saganist said:![]()
Help me, is this Sagan starting to sprint to bridge into the first echelon? Watch the video here
https://youtu.be/ZeXEPOKKFps?t=2520
I do not have access to a HD version of the video and you can see it only for few seconds, but it does look his style.
Echoes said:tann79 said:Yes , I do agree with you that Peter is still manchild, but.. with great and good hearth. What is it to hate?
So you hate optimistic person with good hearth cos he is exhibitionist one. Good for you :/
I cannot speak for LS but yes good for me, then. Certainly if I don't believe a word of what is said above.
Do you think if Kolar had said "yes, please" Sagan would not have done it?Libertine Seguros said:Yea, and Contador could say that he would have gifted Matteo Tosatto the win on Mont Ventoux if they'd only done a Saunier Duval and Contador hadn't been injured. The problem with things like that is that they're purely anecdotal and have little relevance because the chances of Sagan having to honour those commitments is practically zero. The only one of those that I put any stock in is Juraj's national championship. Of course Froome was going to sprint, there were time bonuses at the line, and Sagan would rightly be chewed out if Tinkoff failed to win that stage from a two on one and with by far the best sprinter in the trio; anybody who honestly believes a guy whose best sprint placement this year is 4th in stages of the Tour de Langkawi was going to stand a chance in the World Championships bunch gallop to the extent Sagan would lead him out doesn't think gullible appears in the dictionary.
Because he's a winner, one of the best riders of his generation and not someone who just races for podium spots.hfer07 said:What's up with Boonen being so disappointed? He should be happy to be able to podium at this point on his career, well knowing his sprinting skills aren't what they used to be so-even Cav and his renaissance was not enough to stop Sagan...
Truthfully? I absolutely believe he wouldn't have. If he had, I would also absolutely believe he shouldn't have, either.kingjr said:Do you think if Kolar had said "yes, please" Sagan would not have done it?
Libertine Seguros said:1.)Truthfully? I absolutely believe he wouldn't have.kingjr said:Do you think if Kolar had said "yes, please" Sagan would not have done it?
2.)If he had, I would also absolutely believe he shouldn't have, either.
Probably regretting waiting for the sprint, and he must've felt that these worlds were really well suited to him, what with him winning all those desert races and all. He had a real chance of winning, his last one.hfer07 said:What's up with Boonen being so disappointed? He should be happy to be able to podium at this point on his career, well knowing his sprinting skills aren't what they used to be so-even Cav and his renaissance was not enough to stop Sagan...
1) People lap up these stories because they want to believe Sagan is a great guy, and he's happy to feed it because it keeps people paying attention to him. Leading out Michal Kolar to make an anonymous top 10 won't get him on MTV Cribs. It's easy to make a promise, but come the final kilometre of a World Championships race, if he doesn't realise he's the better option he's a complete idiot. I think Sagan is many things, but I'm not convinced that's one of them. People want to believe Sagan is nigh on flawless, and have grown very defensive about him to the point where any contrary opinion is hounded like a rogue Froome fan being set on in the Clinic.kingjr said:Libertine Seguros said:1.)Truthfully? I absolutely believe he wouldn't have.kingjr said:Do you think if Kolar had said "yes, please" Sagan would not have done it?
2.)If he had, I would also absolutely believe he shouldn't have, either.
To 1.) Why not?
To 2.) What would it say about Sagan's personality in your view if he had done it?