I read the article and if the suspension is based on a proof of using a prohibited substance. Then it's justified.
If it will turn out the suspension is based on usage of a "controversial substance" that is not banned and is not considered to be doping. Then this is not justified.
We'll see.
If it will turn out the suspension is based on usage of a "controversial substance" that is not banned and is not considered to be doping. Then this is not justified.
We'll see.