Re:
barmaher said:
I agree with all of that, staubstauger. I think there would have been a happier medium with Lopez doing a couple of turns in the front, so long as Carapaz reciprocated.
It's a tricky one. Between Finestre and Sestriere he definitely did what he had to do, he was getting gapped on Sestriere as well.
I do think I agree that a few soft pulls were probably for the best at least between Sestriere and Jafferau, if Carapaz was willing to go for it as well. But I think that was also a DS issue. Carapaz and Lopez are both really young and have really strong directors. If they were telling them to sit, both of those guys were going to sit. So a little behind the scenes negotiating was what Sunweb would've needed to do. And I'm not sure that's a good thing.
Again, given the result, it was absolutely the right tactical play. Pinot ended up cracking anyway, and Dumoulin and Froome were too strong. In hindsight, not working was completely the right move.
And as for the peloton capital earned by helping out Dumoulin: ask Reichenbach what that's really worth. Yes, too bad for Tom that having Lopez there meant that Carapaz was not going to work and Pinot wasn't going to fully committ. But that's how it plays out some times. And that's a good thing.
I think it's a lot worse when guys start working for no reason. I can think of another Colombian saving a Giro for a popular former Champion on Finestre. As much as I enjoyed seeing Il Falco race, that I could've really done without.